Deformational structures and stress field of the south-western Crimea in the context of the evolution of Western-Black basin

2014;
: pp. 53-68
https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2014.02.053
Received: December 19, 2014
1
S. I. Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
2
Aix-Marseille University
3
University of Nice-Sophia-Antipolis
4
Institute of Geophysiscs, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
5
Institute of Geophysiscs, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyze the deformations of the mesolevel (slickensides, fractures, faults) in the rock complexes of different age, to reconstruct the stress fields which corresponds to them. The results of interpretation will be compared with the previous studies as well as with known seismic sections and with earthquake focal mechanisms of Crimean-Caucasian seismogenic zone , analyzing them in the context of tectonic evolution of Western-Blak Sea Basin. To define the tectonic stages, specifying the age of deformation. Methodology. The deformations were studied in two sedimentary complexes of different ages. Cosedimentary fractures and faults were studied in the Lower Cretaceous deposits and deformations in the contact between Upper  Jurassic  and  Lower  Cretaceous rocks. The other studied group of deformational objects were investigated in  outcrops of Upper Cretaceous - Neogene rock complex. In the processing and interpretation of the slickensides the kinematic  method and the program Win Tensor [Devlaux,  Sperner, 2003] was used,  and the program Stereo 32 by K. Ruller and K.Trepmann was used to build the stereograms. Results of the analysis allow us to define at least two generalized stages in the tectonic evolution of South Western Crimea (SWC). About the extational stages the slickensides of normal type are evidenced by the normal faults  which contain the relict slickensides, tectonic breccias and traces of attached marine organisms. The strike azimuth of the slickensides is 250°-320°. The corresponding stress fields are characterized by N-S, NE-SW and NW-SE orientation of the extensional axis. According to new stratigraphy dating and structural analysis it is possible to conclude that the period of normal faulting started at least in valanginian-barremian, which is connected to the opening of Western Black Sea Basin during Early Cretaceous [Hippolit et al., 2014, Sheremet et al. 2014]. Reinterpretation of the seismic profile DSS 25 which crosses western part of the Black-Sea in the submeridional direction, shows the latitudinal normal fault of high amplitude along the margin of the continental shelf slope, which could be used during the rifting stage of the opening of the Western Black Sea Basin [Yegorova et al.,2010; Baranova et al., 2008]. This fault is located on the western marine prolongation of the series of normal faults of Early Cretaceous, which were defined in SWC, and it could be of the same age. The compressional stage is fixed in the Upper Cretaceous - Neogene rocks with strike-slip  and thrusted  structures, which are related with the compression during Paleocene-Early Miocene. The stress-field which corresponds to those structures  is characterized by several orientation of the axis of compression. In the western part of the study area the SW-NE compression is prevails, but for the Central and Eastern part there are N-S and SE-NW compression. In the some outcrops of the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous sedimentary complex the strike-slip and reverse faults are observed. The recovered stress field shows N-S and NW-SE orientation of the axis of compression. Respectively, some compressional deformation studied previously in the Tavrik Unit, Middle Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous could be reactivated in the period of Cenozoic compression. Cenozoic compression stages are clearly distinguished in the CDP seismic sections, fixing thrusts and folds at the thrust faults. Our data shows also the compression during Miocene, but those deformations are not commensurate with those during Paleocene-Early Eocene and Late Eocene-Oligocene. The resent compression of latitudinal and meridional trending was defined on the base of 26 earthquake focal mechanisms. At the same time, seven  mechanisns pointed out to extension (the same results we obtained from the analysis of young normal faults).  According to the results of recovering of the stress axis it is possible to conclude that the compression deformation appeared because of the pressure of Black Sea plate to the Crimea but recent normal faults are connected to the continue of the dippening of Black Sea Basin and with the denudation of Crimea Mountains. Originality. Deformation of  mesolevel in the Upper Cretaceous-Neogene rocks are described for the first time. Obtained for them  the compression field evidences of the manifestation of Cenozoic deformation in the study area. The normal type tectonic slickensides for the first time considered in the context of the opening of the Western Black Sea basin. Age frames  for stages of deformation of rock complexes of SWC are specified. Practical significance. The information about stress-strain condition of WSC is very important for the prediction of the negative exo- and endogenous geological processes: the seismic activity, landslides and other dangerous events. Clarifying of the geodynamic model is necessary for further seismic predictability, engineering geological investigations and preparation of various types of cartographic documents.

1. Alehin V. I. Deformacii gornyh porod i re-zul'taty rekonstrukcij polej paleonaprjazhenij mysa Fiolent (jugo-zapadnyj Krym) po novym tek-tonofizicheskim dannym [Rock deformation and results of fields reconstructions of Cape Phiolent palaeostresses (the South-Western Crimea) on new tectonophysical data]. Naukovі pracі DonNTU. Serіja gіrnicho-geologіchna, 2012,16 (206), pp. 184 -192.
2. Afanasenkov A. P., Nikishin A. M., Obukhov A. N. Geologicheskoe stroenie i uglevodorodnyj potencial Vostochno-Chernomorskogo regiona [Geological structure and hydrocarbon potential of the Eastern Black Sea region]. Moscow, Nauchnyj mir, 2007, 172 p.
3. Baranova, E. P., Yegorova, T. P., Omelchenko, V. D. Pereinterpretacija sejsmicheskih materialov GSZ i gravitacionnoe modelirovanie po profiljam 25, 28 i 29 v Chernom i Azovskom morjah [Reinterpretation of DSS seismic materials and gravity modeling along the profiles 25, 28 and 29 in the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov]. Geofizicheskii zhurnal - Geophysical Journal, 2008, no. 5, pp. 1-20.
4. Verhovtsev V. G. Noveyshie platformennyie geostrukturyi Ukrainyi i dinamika ih razvitiya: avtoreferat diss. na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora geologicheskih nauk [he newest platform geostructures of Ukraine and the dynamics of their development. In: the author's diss. for the degree of PhD]. Kiev, 2007, 20 p.
5. Volfman Yu. M. O vlijanii kinematicheskih obstanovok na ciklichnost' geologicheskih processov v predelah Kryma i Severnogo Prichernomor'ja v techenie al'pijskogo jetapa [The effect of kinematic environments on the cyclical geological processes within the Crimea and the Northern Black Sea region during the Alpine stage]. Geofizicheskii zhurnal - Geophysical Journal, 2008, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 101-114.
6. Volfman Yu. M. Deformacionnye rezhimy i kinematicheskie obstanovki novejshego tektonicheskogo raz-ryvoobrazovanija v predelah Gornogo Kryma [Deformational regimes and kinematic conditions of the newest tectonic faulting withing the Crimea Mountains]. Geofizicheskii zhurnal - Geophysical Journal, 2014, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 44-64.
7. Gintov O. B. Polevaja tektonofizika i ee primenenie pri izuchenii deformacij zemnoj kory Ukrainy [Field tectonophysics and its application in the study of the Earth's crust deformation in Ukraine]. Kiev, Feniks, 2005, 572 p.
8. Gintov O. B., Egorova T. P., Tsvetkova T. A., Bugaenko I. V., Murovskaya A. V. Geodinamicheskie osobennosti zony sochlenenija Evrazijskoj plity i Al'pijsko-Gimalajskogo pojasa v predelah Ukrainy i prilegajushhih territorij [Geodynamic features of the junction zone between the Eurasian plate and the Alpine-Himalayan belt within Ukraine and adjacent territories]. Geofizicheskii zhurnal - Geophysical Journal, 2014, vol. 36, no. 4, 2014, pp. 26-63.
https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v36i5.2014.111568
9. Gonchar V. V., Gintov O. B. Masshtab i mehanizmy tektonicheskih peremeshhenij intruzij Juzhnogo berega Kryma po dannym analiza paleonaprjazhenij [Scale and mechanisms of tectonic movements of the intrusions of the Southern coast of the Crimea by the palaeostresses analysis]. Izv. Vuzov. Geologija i razvedka - Proc. Universities. Geology and Exploration, 2006, no. 6, pp. 11-19.
10. Ivanov V. E., Lomakin I. E., Topolyuk A. S., Efremtseva L. L., Boldyrev S. N. Osobennosti tektoniki jugo-zapadnogo Kryma [Features of tectonics of the South-Western Crimea]. Geologija i poleznye iskopaemye mirovogo okeana - Geology and Mineral Resources of the World Ocean, 2009, no. 4, pp. 27-39.
11. Muratov M. V. Kratkij ocherk geologicheskogo stroenija Krymskogo poluostrova [A brief sketch of the geologicalstructure of the Crimean peninsula]. Moscow, State.scientific and engineering. publ. literature on geology and subsoil protection, 1960, 206 p.
12. Murovskaya A. V. Naprjazhenno-deformirovannoe sostojanoe Zapadnogo Gornogo Kryma v oligocen-chetvertichnoe vremja po tektonofizicheskim dannym [Stress-strained state of the Western Mountain Crimea in Oligocene-Quaternary according to tectonophysical data]. Geofizicheskii zhurnal - Geophysical Journal, 2012, vol.34, no. 2, pp. 109-119.
13. Murovskaya A, Sheremet Y, Kolesnikova Y, Lazarenko O. Deformacii verhnemelovyh - neogenovyh otlozhenij jugo-zapadnogo Kryma po tektono-fizicheskim dannym [Deformation in the Upper Cretaceous - Neogene sediments of the south-western Crimea on the base of tectonophysical data]. Geofizicheskii zhurnal - Geophysical Journal, 2014, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 79-92.
https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v36i6.2014.111027
14. Derzhavna geologіchna karta Ukraїni. Masshtab 1:200 000. Krims'ka serіja. Arkushі L-36-XXVIII (Єvpatorіja), L-36-XXXIV (Sevastopol') ta pojasnjuval'na zapiska do neyi [State geological map of Ukraine. Scale 1: 200 000. Crimean series. Sheets L-36-XXVIII (Evpatoria), L-36-XXXIV (Sevastopol) and its explanatory note]. Kiev, Derzhavna geologіchna sluzhba, KP «Pіvdenekogeocentr» - Kyiv, State Geological Survey, KP "Pivdenekogeotsentr», 2006, 175 p.
15. Pustovitenko A. A. Katalog mehanizmov ochagov (Krym). [The catalogue of the mechanisms of seismic centers (The Crimea)] Zemletrjasenija Severnoj Evrazii v 2005 godu [The earthquakes of the Northen Eurasia in 2005], Obninsk, GS RAS, 2011, on CD.
16. Pustovitenko, B. G. Mehanizm ochagov oshhutimyh zemletrjasenij Krymsko-Chernomorskogo regiona poslednih 20 let [Mechanism of notable earthquakes of Crimea-Black Sea region of last 20 years]. Sejsmologicheskij bjulleten' Ukrainy za 2000 god [Seismological Bulletin of Ukraine for the 2000 Year], Sevastopol, EKOSIGydrofizika, 2002, pp. 59-64.
17. Yudin V. V. Geologicheckaya karta i razrezy Gornogo, Predgornogo Kryma. Masshtab 1:200 000 [Geologic map and sections of the Mountain, Foothill Crimea. Scale 1:200 000]. Simferopol, Soyuzkarta, 2009.
18. Yudin V. V. Geodinamika Кryma [Geodynamics of the Crimea]. Diaypi, Simferopol, 2011, 335 p.
19. Devlaux D., Sperner B. New aspects of tectonic stress inversion with reference to the TENSOR propram. New insights into Structural interpretation and Modelling. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2003, v. 212, pp. 75-100.
https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.212.01.06
20. Finetti I., Bricchi G., Del Ben A. et al. Geophysical study of the Black Sea. Boll. Geol. Teor. Ed Applicata, 1988, v. 30, no. 117-118, pp. 197-324.
21. Hippolite J.-C. Geodynamics of Dobrogea (Romania): new constraints on the evolution of the Tornquist-Teisseyre Line, the Black Sea and the Carpathians. Tectonophysics, 2002, no. 357, pp. 33-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00361-X
22. Hippolite J.-C., Muller C., Kaymakci N., Sangu E. Dating of the Black Sea Basin: new nannoplankton ages from itsinverted margin in the Central Pontides (Turkey). Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2010, v. 340, pp. 113-136.
https://doi.org/10.1144/SP340.7
23. Hippolite J.-C., Murovskaya A., Muller C., Volfman Yu, Yegorova T., Gintov O., Sosson M., Sheremet (Korniyenko) Ye. Preliminary study of Cretaceous normal faulting in Western Crimea. Special Darius publication of final symposium December 8-9, 2014, pp.66-67.
24. Kaymakci N., Graham R., Bellingham P., Horn B. Deep structure and tectonics of Black Sea basin inferred from seismic data (BLACKSEA-SPAN). Special Darius publication of final symposium December 8-9, 2014, pp. 70-71.
25. Khriachtchevskaia O., Stovba S., & Stephenson R. Cretaceous-Neogene tectonic evolution of the northern margin of the Black Sea from seismic reflection data and tectonic subsidence analysis. In: Sosson, M., Kaymakci, N., Stephenson, R. A., Bergerat, F. & Starostenko, V. (eds) Sedimentary Basin Tectonics from the Black Sea and Caucasus to the Arabian Platform. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2010, v, 40, pp. 137-157.
https://doi.org/10.1144/SP340.8
26. Nikishin A. M., Koroyaev M. V., Ershov A. V., BRUNET M.-F. The Black Sea basin: tectonic history and Neogene-Quaternary rapid subsidence modeling. Sedimentary Geology, 2003, no. 156, pp. 149-168.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(02)00286-5
27. Nikishin A. M., Okay A., Tüysüz O., Demirer A., Wannier M., Amelin N., Petrov E. The Black Sea basins structure and history: New model based on new deep penetration regional seismic data. Part 2: Tectonic history and paleogeography, Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014, (in press). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.08.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.08.018
28. Robinson A., Rudat J. H., Banks C. J. & Wiles R. L. F. Petroleum geology of the Black Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1996, v. 13, no. 2, pp. 195-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(95)00042-9
29. Saintot A., Angelier J., Chorowicz J., Mechanical significance of structural patterns identified by remote sensing studies: a multiscale analysis of tectonic structures in Crimea. Tectonophysics, 1999, no. 313, pp.187-218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00196-1
30. Sheremet Y, Sosson M, Muller C, Murovskaya A, Gintov O., Yegorova T. and Hippolite J.-C. New stratigraphic and structural data from the East Crimea mountains: consequence on the tectonic evolution of the Eastern Black Sea basin. Special Darius publication of final symposium December 8-9, 2014, pp. 136-137.
31. Zonenshain L. P., Le Pichon X. Deep basins of the Black Sea and Caspian Sea as remnants of Mesozoic back-arc basins. Tectonophysics, 1986, no. 123, pp.181-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(86)90197-6
32. Yegorova T., Gobarenko V. Structure of the Earth's crust and upper mantle of West- and East Black Sea Basins revealed from geophysical data and their tectonic implications. In: Sosson M., Kaymakci N., Stephenson R., Bergerat F., Starostenko V. (eds.) Sedimentary Basin Tectonics from the Black Sea and Caucasus to the Arabian Platform. Geological Society, 2010, London, Special Publicatons, no. 340, pp. 23-42.
https://doi.org/10.1144/SP340.3
33. Yegorova T., Baranova E., Omelchenko V. The crustal structure of the Black Sea from the reinterpretation of deep seismic sounding data acquired in the 1960s. In: Sosson M., Kaymakci N., Stephenson R., Bergerat F., Starostenko V. (eds.) Sedimentary Basin Tectonics from the Black Sea and Caucasus to the Arabian Platform. Geological Society, 2010, London, Special Publicatons, no. 340, pp. 43-56.
https://doi.org/10.1144/SP340.4