Purpose. This study focuses on the analysis of structures and kinematics of the western closure of the Horlovka anticline to present a general development mechanism and to determine whether the structural complexity of the study area is consistent with a single regional stress field or not. Methodology. The kinematic and structural data available for the study zone have been studied. Further, fault data, including both the fault plane and slickenline orientations, and the sense of movement, have been studied by the kinematic analysis method of O. Gushchenko to estimate characteristics of the mesoregional stress field. Local stress data have been processed by the method for determination of general stress fields provide for reconstruction of main normal stresses which are arbitrarily considered as regional stresses. Results. Strike-slip faults (NW-trending, dextral; N–S and NE-trending, sinistral) prevail among the other faults. Mesoregional stress field characterized by subhorizontal NW–SE maximum and NE–SW minimum principal axes, and apparently originated in Laramide time of Alpine orogeny is shear type and the youngest for the Donets Basin. The pattern of a single structural paragenesis of deformation elements of the study area, including a conjugate strike-slip fault system, dome-shaped fold and longitudinal thrusts in its limbs, was developed due to the right-lateral displacements along the longitudinal strike-slip fault system within the Main anticline paraxial part. Originality. Strike-slip faults and large shear zone are revealed in the structure of the study area, and characterized its morphology, development, and interaction of structural elements in zone of distributed shear deformation. The primary characteristics of the stress fields of local and mesoregional level are reconstructed. Practical significance. Taking importance of the results obtained by the kinematic method into account, applying of the methods based on reconstruction of primary tectonophysical characteristics and restoration of deformation mechanisms will allow better prediction of the small-scale faulting and outburstable zones.
1. Beseda A. P., V. A. Dudnik, V. A. Korchemagin, I. O. Pavlov. Features of the paleotectonic stress fields in outburstable zones of Donetsk and Makeevka and Central regions of Donbas. Transanctions of DonNTU. Mining and geological series. 2007, Isssue 6 (125), pp. 19-23. (In Russian).
2. Crustal-scale pop-up structure in cratonic lithosphere: DOBRE deep seismic reflection study of the Donbas fold belt, Ukraine / Y. Maystrenko, S. Stovba, R. Stephenson, U. Bayer, E. Menyoli, D. Gajewski., C. Huebscher, W. Rabbel, A. Sa-intot, V. Starostenko, H. Thybo, A. Tolkunov // Geology, 2003, Vol. 31, pp. 733-736.
3. Gintov O. B. Field tectonophysics and its application to the studies of deformations of the Earth's crust of the Ukraine. Kiev, Phoenix Publ., 2005, 572 p. (In Russian).
4. Gushchenko O. I. The method of kinematic analysis of destruction structures in reconstruction of tectonic stress fields. In: Fields of stress and strain in the lithosphere. Moscow: Nauka, 1979, pp. 7-25.
5. Korchemagin V. A. Fissure tectonics, mechanism and history of the development of the structure of the Nikitovka ore field. Doctoral dissertation. Moscow, 1970, 150 p.
6. Korchemagin V. A., Yemets V. S. Distinctive features of development of the tectonic structure and stress fields of the Donets basin and the Eastern Azov region. Geotectonics, 1987, Vol. 21, pp. 231-237 (In Russian).
7. Korchemagin V. A., I. O. Pavlov, V. A. Dudnik Structural and tectonophysical location of outbursts on Bulavinskaya mine field (Central Donbas). Transanctions of DonNTU. Mining and geological series. 2006, Issue 1 (111), pp. 44-50. (In Russian).
8. Lukinov V. V., Pimonenko L. I. Tectonics of methane-coal deposits of the Donbas. Kiev: Nauk. Dumka, 2008. 350 p. (In Russian).
9. Paleostress field reconstruction and revised tectonic history of the Donbas fold and thrust belt (Ukraine and Russia). A. Saintot, R. Stephenson, A. Brem, S. Stovba, V. Privalov. Tectonics. 2003, Vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 13-39.
10. Privalov V. A. Panova O. A. Strike-slip faulting and block rotation in the Donetsk Basin. 3rd EAGE International Conference and Exhibition on Geosciences - Geosciences: From New Ideas to New Discoveries, St. Petersburg. 2008, available at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 280831511_B029_Strike-slip_Faulting_and_Block_Rotations_in_the_Donets_Basin
11. Sim L. A. The impact of global tectogenesis on the most recent state of stresses of platforms in Europe. In: M. V. Gzovsky and development of tectonophysics. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2000, pp. 326-350 (in Russian).
12. Sim L. A. Overview of the state of knowledge on paleotectonic stresses and their implications for solution of geological problems. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 2013, 4 (3), pp. 341-361, available at: gt.crust.irk.ru/index.php/jour/article/download/67/69(In Russian).
13. Smishko R. M. Main features of the tectonics of the central part of Donbas. Visnyk Lviv. Univ. Ser. Geol., 2004, Is. 18, pp. 143-153 (In Ukrainian).
14. Stovba S. N. Stephenson R. A. A comparative analysis of the structure and the history of the formation of the SE Dnieper-Donets Basin and the Donets folded fabric. Geophys. Journal, 2000, Vol. 22, № 4, рр. 37-61 (in Russian).
15. Structures associated with inversion of the Donbas Foldbelt (Ukraine and Russia). A. Saintot, R. Ste-phenson, S. Stovba, Yu. Maystrenko. Tecto-nophysics, 2003, Vol. 373, pp. 181-207.
16. The neotectonic stress field pattern of the East European Platform. L. A. Sim, V. Korchemagin, A. Frischbutter, P. Bankwitz. Zeitschrift fur Geologische Wissenschaften, 1999, 27 (3-4), pp.161-181.
17. Zabigailo V. E., Lukinov V. V., Pimonenko L. I. Tec-tonics and mining and geological conditions of Donbas coal deposits mining. - Kiev : Nauk. Dumka Publ., 1994, 150 p. (in Russian).