The analyzed positions of scientists that determine the content of criminal procedure functions. Here the question was examined regarding the content, the moment of occurrence and the stages of the implementation of the criminal procedure function of the prosecution. It is emphasized that the function of the prosecution is the driving force of the criminal process and contributes to the emergence of other criminal procedural functions of the defense and the trial.
Strengthening the role of prosecutors by the exercise of supervision in the form of pre-trial investigation procedure requires management to study the characteristics exercising their judicial powers on key areas of criminal procedural activities.
The article covers issues concerning the question of criminal procedure during the application of temporary access to items and documents. It is reasoned that the Code of criminal procedure of Ukraine recognizes temporary access to items and documents as lawful voluntary act and on the basis of court decision. Besides, there are analyzed the form of admission to the investigative judge, court with the petition for the temporary access to items and documents, its decision, enforcement and outcomes of non-execution.
The article based on the analysis of the current legislation, special literature, prosecutorial practices considered problematic moments of the prosecutor's participation in proving when reporting suspected in the course of pre-trial investigation.
On the basis of the consideration of representations of proving in criminal proceedings,
the criminal procedural law of Ukraine, modern prosecutorial and investigative practices
disclosed features of the implementation of its powers by the prosecutor in proving during the
pre-trial investigation. Grounded inconsistency of views of individual scientists do not admit
evidence of the actual data collected during the pretrial investigation. Based on the approach
to the definition of proving in criminal proceedings as a cognitive activity, which includes both
In the article issues concerning criminal procedure while executing a search are analyzed. Procedural grounds and a process of search execution by authorized persons at a time of criminal procedure are revealed. Also, it is admitted that the application of proper legal procedure will encourage the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms of a person in criminal procedure.