Annotation. The article examines the issue of normative and legal regulation of the activities of the President of Ukraine, in particular, the definition of the powers of the President of Ukraine in the Constitution of Ukraine and the problems of normative and legal regulation of the implementation of the powers of the President of Ukraine at the legislative level.
Annotation. The article examines the problems of regulatory regulation of the powers of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine at the level of the Constitution of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine "On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine", the question of the adequacy of the scope of the powers of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and the possibility of their improvement through a significant expansion in order to qualitatively ensure the performance of the function of protecting the Constitution of Ukraine.
The issue of defining the concept of "criminal legal qualification" was considered. It is noted that in order to regulate the most important social relations, the state adopts laws that establish generally accepted rules of behavior. The law on criminal liability is one of the important means of protecting life, health, honor, dignity, inviolability and security of a person as the highest social value, the state system of Ukraine, its political and economic systems, property and the entire legal order from criminal encroachments and a means of combating them.
The article examines the essence of the nature of the phenomenon of aggression and characterizes it as a determining factor of illegal human behavior. Various definitions of the concept of aggression as one of the internal deep-psychological determinants of behavior are considered. It is substantiated that aggression, as a predetermined and socially determined behavior, is inextricably linked with the satisfaction of the basic life needs of an individual.
The article indicates that the honor and dignity of a person is an important factor and an integral component of his constitutional rights and freedoms. Starting from antiquity, in many normative legal acts such as Roman law, Digests of Justinian, the legislation of Kievan Rus, and other European states, the desire to protect the rights, honor and dignity of privileged social classes, and later also of free people, through the legislative policy of the state, can be traced.
The article is devoted to the analysis of the main models of criminalization of acts.
Based on the principles and grounds of criminalization (decriminalization), the legislature creates a new criminal law (or, conversely, changes or repeals the existing one). At the same time, preliminary models of the new norm are being developed, which must meet different, sometimes contradictory requirements.
The article is devoted to the characterization of a criminal organization as a form of complicity.
Organized crime is a negative social phenomenon that is caused by social relations that arise as a result of human activity.
In the current Criminal Code of Ukraine, the criminal organization has found expression as the most dangerous form. The need to define this form of complicity, its typical and specific features is caused primarily by the rapid growth of organized crime.
The article is devoted to the characterization of a criminal organization as a form of complicity.
Organized crime is a negative social phenomenon that is caused by social relations that arise as a result of human activity.
Problem setting. Economic development is very important in the processes of positive transformations of the country, a large part of ensuring economic growth is transport infrastructure, one of the main types of which is road transport. Recently, the Ukrainian economy has been weakened by the global crisis, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the worst thing that has happened so far is the extremely difficult martial law and the Russian invasion with a full-scale war against Ukraine.
The relevance of the problem study of legal understanding shall be determined by a combination of ideological, social and political factors, including the urgent need to comprehend legal understanding as the most important regulator of social relations, as well as the need for a critical rethinking of traditional concepts of legal understanding.