Business limitations for legislators as measure of lustration

Vìsn. Nac. unìv. “Lʹvìv. polìteh.”, Ser.: Ûrid. nauki, 2016; 855(12): 73–78

Authors: 

N. Kaminska, K. Hlabistova

The article is devoted to business restriction established by law for the members of parliament of Ukraine. The analysis of the problem of corporate rights owned by the People’s Deputies in the context of lustration has been made. The relevant international experience on this issue was considered. The reasons for non-use of the existing mechanism in the law of lustration in this area was revealed.

1. Hospodars’kyy kodeks Ukrayiny, pryynyatyy 16 sichnya 2003 r. [Hospodars’kyy kodeks Ukrayiny] // Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 2003. Vol. 18, 19-20, 21-22. Р. 144. 2. Tsyvil’nyy kodeks Ukrayiny, pryynyatyy 16 sichnya 2003 r. [Tsyvil’nyy kodeks Ukrayiny] // Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 2003. Vol. 40–44. Р. 356. 3. Rishennya Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny u spravi za konstytutsiynym podannyam 53 narodnykh deputativ Ukrayiny shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsiyi
Ukrayiny (konstytutsiynosti) punktu 2 chastyny pershoyi statti 7, punktu 2 rozdilu VIII “Prykintsevi ta perekhidni polozhennya” Zakonu Ukrayiny “Pro zasady zapobihannya i protydiyi koruptsiyi”: vid 13.03.2012 r. 6-rp/2012 [Rishennya Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny]. Available at: http://zakon4.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/v006p710-12. 4. Ekspertnyy vysnovok shchodo konfliktu interesiv obranykh osib ta koruptsiyi: natsional’ne zakonodavstvo, yevropeys’ka praktyka, propozytsiyi [Ekspertnyy vysnovok shchodo konfliktu interesiv obranykh osib ta koruptsiyi]. Available at: http:// www.coe.int/t/dghl/ cooperation/economiccrime/corruption/projects/UPAC/Technical%20papers/UA/344-UPAC-TP-Conflict- Interest-ALI-June2008-Ukr.pdf. 5. Kovryzhenko D. Zapobihannya konfliktu interesiv ta koruptsiyi v deputat·s’kiy diyal’nosti: dosvid krayin ЕS ta propozytsiyi dlya Ukrayiny [Zapobihannya konfliktu interesivta koruptsiyi v deputats’kiy diyal’nosti] / D. Kovryzhenko // Chasopys PARLAMENT. 2011. Vol. 3. P. 2–74. 6. Pohorets’kyy M. A. Prytyahnennya suddiv do kryminal’noyi vidpovidal’nosti za st. 375 KK Ukrayiny: problemni pytannya material’noho ta protsesual’noho prava [Prytyahnennya suddiv do kryminal’noyi vidpovidal’nosti zast. 375 KK Ukrayiny] / M. A. Pohorets’kyy // Visnyk kryminal’noho sudochynstva. 2015. Vol. 2. P. 223–234.