On the basis of a thorough analysis of scientific papers highlighted the problem of deviations in the legal system of social and cultural change. It was found that the phenomenon of deviance ambivalent nature and can mean both negative and positive social change. In the scientific literature rejection divided into primary and secondary. Those terms that society is negligible, considered primary, and subjects who commits them, do not qualify as devianta because they do not violate social norms. Secondary deviation are those that violate social norms and their subjects are devianta. Devianta - is the type of person who, violating social norms are not always able and willing to continue to live as before, according to the social requirements.
Depending on the dominant culture declined qualification behavior can vary dramatically: the fact that one culture is considered normal, the other is a deviation. Estimates of deviation change over time, with historical. According to the law converting quantitative to qualitative changes is addictive, psychological adaptation of the population to them. With enhanced intensity change in the estimates in the period of industrialization, especially in the cities. Thus, the relative behavior is rejected and can not be completely uniform criteria for its determination.
1. Lisovyy V. S. Predmet i metod metafizyky: stattya persha [Subject and method of metaphysics: the first article]. Filosofs'ka dumka. 2000. No 4. pp. 130–141.
2. Fromm E. Puti iz bol'nogo obshchestva [Path of a sick society]. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoi filosofii. Moskow, 1986. pp. 443 – 482.
3. Solov'ev V. S. Sochineniya : v 2 t.[ Works: in 2 volumes]. Moskow, 1988. Vol. 1. p. 282.
4. Maksimov L. V. Problema obosnovaniya morali. Logiko-kognitivnye aspekty [The problem of moral justification. Logical and cognitive aspects ]. Moskow, 1991. p. 63.
5. Myasishchev V. I. Struktura lichnosti i otnoshenie cheloveka k deistvitel'nosti [The structure of the human personality and attitude to reality]. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Moskow, 1989. p. 36.
6. Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6 t. Moskow, 1964. Vol. 2. p. 201.
7. Frank S. L. Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva: vvedenie v sotsial'nuyu filosofiyu [Spiritual Foundations of Society: An Introduction to Social Philosophy]. Parizh, 1930. p. 240.
8. Kuchuradi I. Ekonomicheskoe neravenstvo, prava cheloveka, demokratiya i svobodnyi rynok [Economic inequality, human rights, democracy and the free market]. Voprosy filosofii. 1993. No 6. p. 116.
9. Psykholohiya [Psykholohiya]. Kiev, 1999. pp. 386–406.
10. Mirovozzrencheskie orientiry myslitel'noi kul'tury [Ideological orientation of mental culture]. Kiev, 1993. p. 165.
11. Lotman Yu. M. O dvukh modelyakh kommunikatsii v sisteme kul'tury : izbrannye stat'i: v 3 t. [Two models of communication in the system of culture: selected articles]. Tallinn, 1992. Vol. 1. Articles on semiotics and cultural typology. pp. 76–90.
12. Gegel' G. V. F. Raboty rannikh let: v 2 t. [The work of early years]. Moskow, 1973. Vol. 2. pp. 65–66.
13. Tugarinov V. P. Lichnost' i obshchestvo [Individual and Society]. Moskow : Mysl' Publ, 1965. p. 71.
14. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary]. Moskow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ, 1989. p. 212.
15. Rezvitskii I. I. Lichnost'. Individual'nost'. Obshchestvo : Problema individualizatsii i ee sotsial'no-filosofskii smysl [Personality. Individuality. Society: individualization problem and its socio-philosophical sense ]. Moskow: Politizdat Publ, 1984. pp. 33-38.
16. Titarenko A. I. Antiidei. Opyt sotsial'no-eticheskogo analiza [Antiidei. Experience in social and ethical analysis]. Moskow : Politizdat Publ, 1976. p. 94.
17. Khabermas Yu. Ponyatie individual'nosti [The concept of individuality ]. Voprosy filosofii. 1989. No 2. p. 38.