To questionnaire of construction communication on the creation of informed methodology

2017;
: 59 - 63
Authors:
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

The article is devoted to the problems of the theory of the cognitive process, which is connected not only with the establishment of the truth, but with the presence of unequal approaches to the methodology of philosophical and legal science. The issue of the reversibility of the process of cognition, ethical knowledge, which has moral and value criteria, which should be discussed in order to develop the knowledge of the integrative methodology, has been violated.
The emergence of the need to discuss the problems of the crisis in modern philosophy of law arises in connection with the main cause – the methodological contradictions around the concepts of method, methodology, names of methods that are justified in the study or unregulated. This is precisely what caused the ripening of the idea of developing a common integrative methodology, which can be communicated and directed not only to cognition but to practice. Such scientific communication still expects its development, as there are  many reasons besides those mentioned. It is a question of inter-language discrepancy between the seemingly identical concepts in world languages, as well as the controversy which dialectic has the right to descriptive jurisprudence.

1. Tokarczyk R. Filosofia prawa [Filosofia prawa]. Warszawa, 2009. 329 p. 
2. Faschynujące ścieżki filozofii prawa [Faschynujące ścieżki filozofii prawa]. pod redakcja J. Zajadlo. Warszawa: Lexis Nexis Publ, 2008. 328 p. 
3. Symon Yu. S. Metodolohichni superechnosti ta novatsiyi filosofiyi prava pochatku KhKhI stolittya [Methodologische Widersprüche und Neuerungen in der Philosophie des Gesetzes des frühen einundzwanzigsten Jahrhunderts]. Filosofs'ki ta metodolohichni  problemy prava. 2012. No 1. pp. 18–27. 
4. Yaroshovets' V. I. Humanistychnyy zmist metodolohiyi piznannya: avtoref. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya dokt. filos. nauk: spets. 09.00.01 – ontolohiya, hnoseolohiya, fenomenolohiya. [Humanistischer Inhalt der Methodik der Kognition]. Kyiv: Kyiv. un-t im. T. Shevchenka Publ, 1996. 46 p.
5. Burukovs'ka N. Filosofiya doby postmodernu: evolyutsiya problematyky [Philosophie der postmodernen Zeit: die Entwicklung  von  Problemen].  Visnyk  Akademiyi  advokatury  Ukrayiny.  2011. No. 3 (22). pp. 5–9. 
6. Yevropeys'kyy slovnyk filosofiy. Leksykon neperekladnostey [Europäisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Lexikon der Auswirkungen]. za keriv. B. Kassen; per. z fr. Vol. II. Kyiv: DUKh i LITERA Publ, 2011. 488 p. 
7. Kryms'kyy S. Piznannya yak transtsendentsiya sofiyi i spokusa praktykoyu [Erkenntnis als Transzendenz von Sophia und Versuchung durch Übung]. Systema suchasnykh metodolohiy: khrestomatiya: u 4-kh t.; upor., vidp. red., perekl. A. V. Furman. Ternopil': TNEU Publ, 2015. Vol. 1. 314 p. 
8. Berdyayev M. Problema etychnoho piznannya [Das Problem des ethischen Wissens].  Systema  suchasnykh  metodolohiy:  khrestomatiya:  u  4-kh  t.;  upor.,  vidp.  red.,     perekl. A. V. Furman. Ternopil': TNEU Publ, 2015. Vol. 1. 314 p. 
9. Hrabovs'kyy S. Neznanyy “Kapital”, abo shche raz pro Marksa proty Marksa [Die “Hauptstadt” ist nicht bekannt, oder wieder über Marx gegen Marx]. Den'. 2017. No 178–179. 6–7 zhovtnya. p. 21.

 

A. Tokarska «To questionnaire of construction communication on the creation of informed methodology» http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-1-number-884-16-2017/questionnaire-construction-communication