On the basis of the hierarchical structure of a typical cyber-physical system and main stages of crops cultivation, the list of the subsystems necessary for the creation of such a system is considered. The structures and recommendations for these systems are expounded, and the generalized structural scheme of the given cyber-physical system is described issuing from the four main objects of the research: seeding material, soil, intermediate harvest benefits, harvesting, stocking or primary processing. The application of the matrix method for the assessment of production processes quality as well as final products,
which is realized at different hierarchical levels of a cyberphysical system, is proposed. The approach to the analysis of system functioning at all stages of crops cultivation is represented. The principles of data matrices forming at hierarchical levels of a cyber-physical system in combination with the applied subsystem types are presented.
[1] А. О. Melnyk Cyber-physical systems: problems of creation and development trends // Digest of Lviv Polytechnic National University. Computer systems and networks. – 2014. – No. 806. – P. 154–161.
[2] T. Z. Bubela, V. M. Vanko, P. H. Stoliarchuk Principles of constructing cyberphysical systems of crop industry control and management // Digest of National University Computer systems and networks. – No. 830. – 2015. – P. 12–18.
[3] Raven Corp., USA. ООО «Agri 2.0. Precise agriculture». Multifunctional field computer Envizio Pro II. [Online]. Available: http:// www.prom.ua.
[4] Analog Devices. Digital signals processors by Analog Devices. [Online]. Available: http:// www.analog.com.
[5] Texas Instruments. Microcontrollers (MCU). [Online]. Available: http://www.ti.com/lsds/ti/microcontrollers-16-bit-32-bit/msp/overview.pa....
[6] V. P. Sigorsky Mathematical apparatus of an engineer. Iss. 2-е. – Kyiv: Technics, 1977. – 768 s.
[7] V. M. Vanko, P.H. Stolyarchuk Method of assessing production and service quality with the help of matrix theory // Measuring technics and metrology. – No. 67. 2007. – P. 108–114.