The article ssleduetsya truth as legal dogma in positive law. Indeed, in our time, justice must be based on the culture of the world of spiritual wealth, freedom, and human civilization produced by the moral principles of social life, human representations and Steen goodness and justice.
Проблему співвідношення природничо-наукового та гуманітарно-наукового знання обговорено в контексті категорії істини. Розглянуто три основні концепції істини – кореспондентну, прагматистську та когерентну. Прагматистська і когерентна концепції проаналізовані у межах некласичної епістемології як альтернативні щодо кореспондентної концепції. Стверджено пріоритет когерентної концепції під час обговорення проблематики гуманітарного знання.
The article examines the truth with philosophical and legal perspective. In epistemology truth right primarily understood as a process of knowledge of the truth, each of the stages of which can give only relative truth. Fixing some point in the cognitive process as absolutely true suspends the process and turns the truth into a lie because of a mismatch the new conditions and circumstances. It is ignored on this epistemological circumstances built absolutisation positivists significance norms of the law.
The article deals with the moral nature of law as a social phenomenon that is a complete harmonious formation, because its most important task is to consolidate and combine those parts of the integrated world of the society and man which are being destroyed. Under the natural and legal approach law is analyzed as justice, perfection, and truth.
The paper investigates the category of “intuition”, its historical and philosophical traditions, comparative legal analysis of the understanding of the concept of different philosophers of the XVII century, etc.