Аргументовано, що напівпрезидентська система державного правління не є уніфікованою, а натомість позиціонується різноманітною і гетерогенною структурою міжінституційних відносин. На цій підставі виокремлено інституційно-процесуальні фактори типологізації напівпрезиденталізму, які здебільшого обертаються довкола проблематики формування та відповідальності урядів, а також можливості розпуску легіслатур. У світлі запропонованої типологізації з’ясовано особливості, логіку і параметри операціоналізації президентсько-парламентської напівпрезидентської системи державного правління в країнах Європи.
Amorim Neto, O. Strom, K. (2006). Breaking the parliamentary chain of delegation: Presidents and non-partisan cabinet members in European democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 4, 619-643.
Bahro, H. (1999). Virtues and Vices of Semi-Presidential Government. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 11, 1, 1–37.
Brunclik, M.Kubat, M. (2016). Contradictory Approaches: Discussing Semi-Presidentialism in Central Europe. Annals of the University of Bucharest: Political Science Series, 18, 1, 67–79.
Carroll, R., Shugart, M.-S. (2007). Neo-Madisonian Theories of Latin American Institutions. In Munck, G. (Ed.), Regimes and Democracy in Latin America [Volume I: Theories and Agendas]. (pp. 51-104). New York: Oxford University Press.
Cheibub, J., Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T. (2014). Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 44, 3, 515–544.
Chernov, V. (2008). Systemy pravlenyia v Evrope: klassyfykatsyia y sravnytelnyi analyz (na prymere stran Evrosoiuza). [In Russian].Polytyia, 1 (48), 143–159.
Choudhry, S., Stacey, R. (2013). Semi-Presidentialism as a Form of Government: Lessons for Tunisia.The Center for Constitutional Transitions at NYU Law, 2, 62.
Chang, C. (2011). The Competition/Cooperation Relationship in Executive Power Operating Of Semi-Presidentialism. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3, 2, 105–116.
Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types And Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elgie, R., Moestrup, S., Wu,Yu. (2011a). Semi-presidentialism in Western Europe. In R., Elgie (Ed.), Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. (pp.81-97). Dordlecht: Springer.
Elgie, R., Moestrup, S., Wu,Yu.(2011b). Semi-Presidentialism: What Have We Learned? In R., Elgie (Ed.), Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. (pp.264-274). Dordlecht: Springer.
Elgie, R. (1999). The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elgie, R. (2005). Variations on a theme: A fresh look at semi-presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 16, 3, 1–21.
Elgie, R. (2011c). Variation Within Semi-Presidentialism. In R., Elgie (Ed.), Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types And Democratic Performance. (pp. 19-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elgie, R., McMenamin, I. (2007). Variation Within Semi-Presidentialism: Cohabitation, Cabinet Stability, and Non-partisan Prime Ministers. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hyatt Regency Chicago and the Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago, IL., August 30.
Garrido, A. (2009). Semi-presidentialism and democracy: a comparative perspective. World Congress of the International Political Science Association. IPSA Santiago de Chile, July.
Jung-Hsiang, T. (2008). Sub-types of Semi-presidentialism and Political Deadlock. French Politics, 6, 1, 63–84.
Kravets, Y. (2003). Rossyiskaia Konstytutsyia y problemy effektyvnosty ee realyzatsyy. [In Russian].Konstytutsyonnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeiskoe obozrenye, 4 (45), 65–78.
Lytvyn, V. (2009). Klasyfikatsiia yevropeiskoho pivprezydentalizmu. [In Ukrainian].Demokratychne vriaduvannia: Elektronne naukove fakhove vydannia, 3. Retrieved from http://filos.lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/clas.evr_.semi-pr.pdf
McQuire, K. (2012). President-Prime Minister Relations, Party Systems, and Democratic Stability in Semipresidential Regimes: Comparing the French and Russian Models. Texas International Law Journal, 47, 2, 427–454.
Moestrup, S. (2011). Semi-presidentialism and Power Sharing – Does it Work? Examples from Anglophone Africa. Washington: National Democratic Institute.
Morgan-Jones, E., Schleiter, P. (2004). Governmental change in а president-parliamentary regime: The case of Russia 1994–2003. Post-Soviet Affairs, 20, 2, 132–163
Parrish, S. (1998). Presidential Decree Authority in Russia, 1991–1995. In J., Carey, S., Shugart (Eds), Executive Decree Authority. (pp. 62-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pavlenko, P. (2002). Parlamentska vidpovidalnist uriadu: svitovyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: VD “KM Akademiia”.
Protsyk, O. (2004). Ruling with Decrees: Presidential Decree Making in Russia and Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies, 56, 5, 637–660.
Protsyk, O. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism under Post-Communism. In R., Elgie (Ed.), Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. (pp.98-116). Dordlecht: Springer.
Reiter, D., Tillman, E. (2002). Public, Legislative, and Executive Constraints on the Democratic Initiation of Conflict. Journal of Politics, 64, 3, 810–826.
Remington, T., Smith, S., Haspel, M. (1998). Decrees, Laws, and Inter-Branch Relations in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs,14, 4, 301–315.
Remington, T. (2008). Patronage and the Party of Power: President- Parliament Relations Under Vladimir Putin. Europe-Asia Studies, 60, 6, 959–987.
Roper, S. (2002). Are All Semipresidential Regimes the Same? A Comparison of Premier-Presidential Regimes. Comparative Politics, 34, 3, 253–272.
Samuels, D., Shugart, M. (2010). Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Samuels, D., Shugart, M. (2009). The Semi- presidential model and its subtypes: Party presidentialization and the selection and deselection of prime ministers. Paper presented at the Committee of the 10th Congress of the French Political Science Association (A.F.S.P.), Grenoble, 7–9 September.
Schleiter, P. (2003). Mixed Constitutions and Political Instability: Russia 1991–1993. Democratization, 10, 1, 1–26.
Shugart, M. (2008). Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. (pp. 344-365). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shugart, M. (2005a). Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations: Hierarchies vs. Transactions in Constitutional Design. University of California: Center for the Study of Democracy.
Shugart, M. (2005b). Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns. French Politics, 3, 3, 323–351.
Shugart, M., Carey, J. (n/d). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skach, C. (2005). Borrowing Constitutional Design: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Sydorchuk, O. (2013). Osoblyvosti vyboriv u napivprezydentskykh respublikakh : dosvid Ukrainy y Polshchi. [In Ukrainian].Hileia: naukovyi visnyk, 73, 342–344.
Varnavskyi, A. (2010). Smeshannaia (poluprezydentskaia) forma hosudarstvennoho pravlenyia: prychyny y uslovyia stanovlenyia, faktory transformatsyy v sovremennykh uslovyiakh. [In Russian]. Sotsyalno-ekonomycheskye yavlenyia y protsessov, 4, 102–106.
Veser, E. (1999). Semi-presidentialism – Duverger’s Concept – A New Political System Model. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 11, 1, 39–60.
Zaznaev, O. (2006a). Klassyfykatsyy prezydentskoi, parlamentskoi y poluprezydentskoi system. [In Russian].Dynamyka polytycheskykh system y mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenyi, 1, 186-210. Kazan: Kazan. hos. un-t ym. V. Y. Ulianova-Lenyna.
Zaznaev, O. (2006b). Poluprezydentskaia systema: polytyko-pravovoi analyz : dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk : 23.00.02 . [In Russian].Kazan: Kazan. hos. un-t ym. V. Y. Ulianova-Lenyna.
Zaznaev, O. (2005). Smeshannye formy pravlenyia, yly kak maslo soedyniaetsia s vodoi. [In Russian]. Polys, 4, 158–171.