PROGRAMS FOR FORTIFICATION AREA CONSERVATION IN THE NETHERLANDS

AS.
2021;
: 154-164
Authors:
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Architecture and Conservation

The article is aimed at familiarizing readers and specialists with programs for the preservation of fortification territories and methods of using historical landscapes in the Netherlands, the legal aspect of preserving the remains of fortifications and terrain. The project method of integrating the territory into the tourist observation network is considered. Over the past 30 years, the Netherlands has been developing a legal framework in the intersectoral branch for the protection of a significant historical landscape, including existing or lost objects of fortification art of the XVIII and XX centuries. Reasonable protection criteria, a well-formed strategy for systematic use and subordination of the territory prevents violation of the legal framework of the monument and its physical integrity accelerates the process of developing architectural and design proposals for restoring the spatial appearance of the fortification object.

Bart Muskens, Floris Marcus, 2013. Structuurvisie gemeente Grave 2025, Vitale vestinggemeente aan de Maas, Gemeente Grave.
Bloemers, T., Kars, H., Van der Valk, A., & Wijnen, M. (Eds.). (2010). The Cultural Landscape and Heritage Paradox: Protection and Development of the Dutch Archaeological-Historical Landscape and its European Dimension. Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.1017/9789048510962
https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048510962
Janssen, J., 2012. De toekomst van het verleden : ruimtelijke ordening en erfgoedzorg na Belvedere. Wageningen University. https://edepot.wur.nl/239316
Janssen, J., Luiten, EAJ., Renes, H., & Rouwendal, J. (2013). Oude sporen in een nieuwe eeuw. De uitdaging na Belvedere. Netwerk Erfgoed en Ruimte.
Holmes, Rob, 2009. The New Dutch Water Defense Line. [Online]
Available at: http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2009/11/the-new-dutch-water-defense-line/ [Accessed 22 11 2021].
Kresse, Klaas. (2016). Dutch Architecture Policy and Institutional Infrastructure since the 1990's. Architectural research. 18. 49-58. 10.5659/AIKAR.2016.18.2.49.
https://doi.org/10.5659/AIKAR.2016.18.2.49
Nora, P.1989. Between Memory and history, les lieux de memoire in: Representation 26, p 18
https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
The Neatherlands Ministry, of Education, Culture and Science., 2005. Summary. Action Programme on Spatial Planning and Culture, Den Haag: DeltaHage bv.
Schuurman, AJAM 2003, Vertel, muze, vertel. Geschiedenis, ruimte en cultureel erfgoed. in Belvedere en de geschiedenis van de groene ruimte. Historia Agriculturae, no. 33, 9-48 Groningen/Wageningen.
Summary, 2008, The Action Program on Spatial Planning and Culture 2005-2008 [Online]
Available at: https://www.ace-cae.eu/fileadmin/New_Upload/6._Architecture_in_Europe/EU... [Accessed 22 11 2021].
Verschuure, G. A. (2014). Project New Dutch Waterline and Project Arcadian Landscapes: Guidelines for new spatial development based in heritage. In s.n. (Ed.), Proceedings AESOP 2014 annual conference "From control to co-evolution" (pp. 1-13). AESOP
Verschuure-Stuip G., 2020. Hold the Line: The transformation of the New Dutch Waterline and the Future Possibilities of Heritage. In: Hein C. (eds) Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8_13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8_13
Uyttenhove, P., Landschap en geheugen in: K. Bosma, J Kolen (red), Geschiedenis en Ontwerp, handboek voor de omgang met cultureel erfgoed. Van Tilt. Nijmegen, pp. 238-246
Viddil zv'yazkiv z gromadkistyu, 2015. Prokuratura Xar'kovs'koyi oblasti. [Online]
Available at: https://khar.gp.gov.ua/ua/news.html?_m=publications&_c=view&_t=rec&id=16... [Accessed 19 04 2020].
Gavry'lyuk, N.O., My'xajl'chy'shy'n I.R., 2008. Deyaki problemy' pam'yatkooxoronnoyi spravy' v Ukrayini (oxorona kurganiv). Arxeologiya, Issue 1, pp. 82-88.