The selected issues of system engineering methodology in the design of transport systems have been presented. The discussed methodological issues were presented in the example of the metropolitan railway concept project. The system description of the transport project is introduced in accordance with the principles used in systems engineering. The presented case study concerns the methodology of designing the concept of the railway transport system. In the proposed case study, the main issue was the development of a document called the Concept of the Metropolitan Railway System (CoMRS) in the urban area of the Metropolis called in Poland GZM. It was assumed that this document would be a system document developed with the use of Systems Engineering methods in order to build, implement and develop a modern complex railway transport system covering the urban area of the GZM Metropolis. Therefore, in the first place, an additional but essential document was developed – the Methodology for the Metropolitan Railway System Concept (MoCoMRS), which contains a comprehensive methodological description of how to proceed with the use of Systems Engineering methods required for the development of the CoMRS. The methodological guidelines relating to the V model were presented in detail. The methodology description also took into account the system life cycle model in the perspective of the enterprise and systems engineering using the V model. When applying systems engineering in the design of transport systems, it is proposed to use this model, which organizes the system procedure during the design process. The guidelines regarding the use of this model and the application of systems engineering methods for CoMRS, relating, inter alia, to the following design stages: system assumptions, system requirements, high-level design, detailed design, were formulated. The case study of the concept of metropolitan railway presented in this paper is based on a real transport project, and the current stage is working on the preliminary feasibility study of this railway system. It is very important, because it is possible to verify and iteratively correct and update the methodology of designing this railway system depending on the changing conditions and criteria resulting from, among others, different stakeholder aspirations that shape the system requirements. This procedure was also included in the V model in phases of development, construction and implementation of the system, as well as in phases of integration, verification and validation of elements and the entire railway system.
1. Kossiakoff, A., Sweet, W. N., Seymour, S. J., & Biemer, S. M. (2011). Systems engineering principles and practice (Vol. 83). John Wiley & Sons (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118001028
2. Karoń, G., & Mikulski, J. (2020, October). The Main Assumptions for Functional-Operational Configuration of Tasks in Transport Projects. In International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics (pp. 54-70). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59270-7_5 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59270-7_5
3. Systems Engineering for Intelligent Transportation Systems: an Introduction for Transportation Professionals. (2007). US. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration - Federal Transit Administration (in English).
4. Intelligent Transportation System Architecture and Standards (2001). Retrieved from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/04/18/01-9538/intelligent... (in English).
5. National ITS Architecture. Retrieved from: https://highways.dot.gov/public-roads/septoct-1998/national-its-architec... (in English).
6. Karoń, G. & Mikulski, J. (2020) Its and systems engineering - methodical aspects. Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 71-84. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59270-7_6 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59270-7_6
7. Karoń, G., & Mikulski, J. (2012). Problems of ITS architecture development and its implementation in upper-silesian conurbation in Poland. In International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics (pp. 183-198) (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34050-5_22
8. Żochowska, R., & Karoń, G. (2016). ITS services packages as a tool for managing traffic congestion in cities. In Intelligent Transportation Systems-Problems and Perspectives (pp. 81-103). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19150-8_3 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19150-8_3
9. Karoń, G., Mikulski, J., & Janecki, R. (2019). Design and implementation of ITS systems in urban agglomerations-selected system problems. Archives of Transport System Telematics, 12(1), 17-19 (in English).
10. Fortescue, P., Swinerd, G., & Stark, J. (Eds.). (2011). Spacecraft systems engineering. Fourth edition. John Wiley & Sons (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119971009
11. Bonnett, C. F. (2005). Practical railway engineering. Imperial College Press. (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1142/p373
12. Best Practices for Using Systems Engineering Standards (2017). Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Systems Engineering, Defense Pentagon (in English).
13. Karoń G. (2019) Kształtowanie potoków ruchu w sieci transportowej z wykorzystaniem inżynierii systemów [Shaping traffic flows in the transport network with the use of systems engineering]. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice (in Polish).
14. Karoń, G., & Mikulski, J. (2011). Transportation systems modelling as planning, organisation and management for solutions created with ITS. In International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics (pp. 277-290) (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24660-9_32
15. Karoń, G. (2013, October). Travel demand and transportation supply modelling for agglomeration without transportation model. In International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics (pp. 284-293). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-41647-7_35 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41647-7_35
16. Working Group. Systems engineering in transportation projects - A library of case studies (2016). INCOSE (in English).
17. NASA Systems Engineering Handbook (2007). NASA (in English).
18. Systems and software engineering - Life cycle processes - Requirements engineering (2018) ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018 (in English).
19. Walden D. D., Roedler G. J., Forsberg, K. J., Hamelin, R. D., & Shortell, T. M. (2015). INCOSE systems engineering handbook: a guide for system life cycle processes and activities (in English).
20. Liebel, G., Tichy, M., & Knauss, E. (2019). Use, potential, and showstoppers of models in automotive requirements engineering. Software & Systems Modeling, 18(4), 2587-2607. doi: 10.1007/s10270-018-0683-4 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-018-0683-4
21. Vaneman, W. K. (2016). Enhancing model-based systems engineering with the Lifecycle Modeling Language. In 2016 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) (pp. 1-7). doi: 10.1109/SYSCON.2016.7490581 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2016.7490581
22. Gianni D., D'Ambrogio, A., & Tolk, A. (eds.) (2014). Modeling and Simulation-Based Systems Engineering Handbook (1st ed.). CRC Press (in English).
23. Wiecher, C., Fischbadh, J., Greenyer, J., Vogelsang, A., Wolff, C., & Dumitrescu, R. (2021). Integrated and Iterative Requirements Analysis and Test Specification: A Case Study at Kostal. In 2021 ACM/IEEE 24th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS) (pp. 112-122). doi: 10.1109/MODELS50736.2021.00020 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1109/MODELS50736.2021.00020
24. Sutcliffe, A. (2003). Scenario-based requirements engineering. In Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2003, (pp. 320-329) (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.2003.1232776
25. Ncube, C., & Lim, S. L. (2018). On systems of systems engineering: A requirements engineering perspective and research agenda. In 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (pp. 112-123). doi: 10.1109/RE.2018.00021 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00021
26. Umiliacchi, S., Bhatia, D., Brownlee, A., & Brown, C. (2019). Enterprise architecture within railway systems engineering. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 13(10), 1461-1467. doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2018.5062 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2018.5062
27. Baek, Y. G., & Lee, J. C. (2017). Railway Systems Development Based on the Concept of Systems Engineering and Safety: A Case Study of Railway Industry Practices. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 6(10), 18-29. doi: 10.9790/1813-0610021829 (in English).
28. Nicholas J. M., Steyn H. (2012). Zarządzanie projektami. Zastosowanie w biznesie, inżynierii i nowoczesnych technologiach [Project management. Application in business, engineering and modern technologies]. Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business, Warszawa (in Polish).
29. Janecki, R., Karoń, G., & Mikulski, J. (2019). Telematic Applications for the Metropolitan Railway System (MR) in the Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowska Metropolis. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 3-16). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-27547-1_1 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27547-1_1
30. Janecki, R., Karoń, G., Sobota, A., Żochowska, R., Kłos, M. J., & Soczówka, P. (2018). Koncepcja Kolei Metropolitalnej dla Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowskiej Metropolii z wykorzystaniem metod inżynierii systemów [Concept of the Metropolitan Railway for the Metropolis GZM using systems engineering methods]. Wydziału Transportu Politechniki Śląskiej. Katowice (in Polish).
31. Sobota, A., Janecki, R., Karoń, G., & Soczówka, P. (2019). Rola interesariuszy w procesie projektowania koncepcji Kolei Metropolitalnej na przykładzie Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowskiej Metropolii [The role of stakeholders in the process of designing the concept of metropolitan railway system on the example of Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowska metropolitan area]. Problemy Transportu i Logistyki [Problems of Transport and Logistics], 45, 107-118. doi: 10.18276/ptl.2019.45-10 (in Polish).
https://doi.org/10.18276/ptl.2019.45-10
32. Karoń, G., Janecki, R., Krawiec, S., & Kłos, M. J. (2019). Wariantowanie koncepcji kolei metropolitalnej na obszarze Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowskiej Metropolii w warunkach jej konstruowania przy wykorzystaniu metod inżynierii systemów [Varianting of the concept of metropolitan railway system in Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowska metropolisunder conditions of building it using methods of systems engineering]. Problemy Transportu i Logistyki [Problems of Transport and Logistics], 45, 43-52. doi: 10.18276/ptl.2019.45-04 (in Polish).
https://doi.org/10.18276/ptl.2019.45-04
33. Janecki R., Karoń G., Sobota A. & Żochowska R. (2019). Raport z opracowania tematu "Metodologia tworzenia Koncepcji Kolei Metropolitalnej z wykorzystaniem metod inżynierii systemów" [Report on the development of the topic "Methodology of creating the Metropolitan Railway Concept using systems engineering methods"]. Katowice (in Polish).
34. Gasparski, W. (1978). Projektowanie koncepcyjne przygotowanie dzialaň [Designing conceptual preparation of activities]. PWN, Warszawa. (in Polish).
35. Systems Engineering - Guide for ISO/IEC (System Life Cycle Processes). Retrieved from: http://evmworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Guide-to-Isoiec15288.pdf (in English).
36. Romanovsky, A. & Thomas, M. (2013) Introduction. Industrial Deployment of System Engineering Methods, pp. 1-3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33170-1_1 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33170-1_1
37. Janecki R., Karoń, G., Sobota, A., Żochowska, R. & et al. (2018). Metodologia tworzenia Koncepcji Kolei Metropolitalnej z wykorzystaniem metod inżynierii systemów [Methodology of creating the Metropolitan Railway Concept with the use of systems engineering methods]. Biuro Usług Inżynierskich "CONCEPT. Zamawiający: Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowska Metropolia. Katowice (in Polish).
38. Karoń, G., Janecki, R., Żochowska, R., Sobota, A., Soczówka, P., & Kłos, M. J. (2020). Charakterystyka wybranych zagadnień inżynierii systemów na przykładzie tworzenia koncepcji Kolei Metropolitalnej w GZM [Characteristics of selected issues of systems engineering on the example of creating the concept of the Metropolitan Railway in GZM]. Transport Miejski i Regionalny [Urban and Regional Transport], 7, 5-13 (in Polish).
39. Weidmann, N., Salunkhe, S., Anjorin, A., Yigitbas, E., & Engels, G. (2021). Automating Model Transformations for Railway Systems Engineering. J. Object Technol., 20(3), 10-1. doi: 10.5381/jot.2021.20.3.a10 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.5381/jot.2021.20.3.a10
40. Hoang, T. S. (2013). An introduction to the Event-B modelling method. Industrial Deployment of System Engineering Methods, 211-236 (in English).
41. Object Management Group. OMG systems modeling language (OMG SysML), version 1.6 (2019). Retrieved from: https://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/ (in English).
42. Amendola, A., Becchi, A., Cavada, R., Cimatti, A., Griggio, A., Scaglione, G., & et al. (2020). A model-based approach to the design, verification and deployment of railway interlocking system. In International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods (pp. 240-254). doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61467-6_16 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61467-6_16
43. Holt, J., Perry, S. (2019). SysML for systems engineering. A model-based approach. Institution of Engineering and Technology (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1049/PBPC020E