Purpose. The purpose of this study is to develop the evaluation characteristics of the relationship between household savings decisions and macroeconomic growth in order to form a base of identification parameters of effective household financial behavior.
Design/methodology/approach. In the article, the authors used the literature review method to justify the importance of implementing the problem of the relationship between savings and economic growth. Based on the trends analysis the authors identified the main features of households’ saving changes during last 17 years, their relationships with changes in GDP, national income and total income of households. The use of correlation-regression analysis made it possible to assess the sensitivity of the impact on the savings of their main elements. Empirical results have been obtained based on official sources of national statistical data and Wold Bank data.
Findings. Households play a major role in the economic growth of a nation. Their financial behavior and savings habits can determine the overall economic performance of a country. This paper discusses the elements of household savings, how it affects economic growth, and why it has been on a downtrend lately. It also explores the potential solutions to address this issue and how households can be encouraged to save more for their future. The financial behavior of households in Ukraine has seen significant changes over the past 17 years, and the period of change in priorities between current and deferred consumption is the financial crisis of 2008. Since 2009, seriousness towards savings has been significantly lost. The saving behavior of households in Ukraine is in dissonance with the saving behavior of enterprises and state structures. Households’ savings decisions depend to a small extent on both the absolute size of their income and GDP, as well as their rates of change.
Practical implications. The materials presented in the article may be useful for researchers interested in economic growth modeling. Also, the results of this research are of interest to policymakers for creating effective measures of macroeconomic stimulation.
Originality/value. In the article, the authors have identified the main regularities of the behavior of households regarding the formation of savings. The changes in the GDP and household income do have not a significant impact on the saving rates both in the short-term and long-term. The changes in the volume of household savings are mainly determined by the dynamics of the volume of net household loans. Households increase indebtedness when the business cycle intensifies (GDP and national income growth). Households in Ukraine are characterized by a high priority of current consumption over deferred (savings).
1. Carroll C. D., Overland, J., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Saving and growth with habit formation. American Economic Review, 90(3), 341-355. DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.3.341
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.3.341
2. Hicks, J. (1981). "IS-LM": An Explanation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 3(2), 139-154. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/4537583
https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1980.11489209
3. Keynes and Classical Economics. ECON102: Principles of Macroeconomics. Saylor Academy. Retrieved from https://learn.saylor.org/mod/book/tool/print/index.php?id=32044
4. Keynes J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
5. Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 942-963. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117352
6. Mason, R. (2000) The Social Significance of Consumption: James Duesenberry's Contribution to Consumer Theory. Journal of Economic Issues, Association for Evolutionary Economics. 34 (3): 553-572. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2000.11506294, JSTOR 4227586, S2CID 156635575
https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2000.11506294
7. Modigliani F., Brumberg R. (1954). Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data. In PostKeynesian Economics, edited by K. K. Kurihara. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press.
8. Nikiforos M. (2015). A Nonbehavioral Theory of Saving. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Working Paper, No. 844.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2637599
9. Ramsey F. P. A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal, Vol. 38, No. 152 (Dec., 1928), 543-559. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2224098
https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098
10. Ribaj A. and Mexhuani F. (2021). The impact of savings on economic growth in a developing country (the case of Kosovo). Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10:1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731- 020-00140-6
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-00140-6
11. Schmidt-Hebbel K., Serven L. (2006). The Economics of Saving and Growth: Theory, Evidence, and Implications for Policy. Cambrige University Press.
12. Shea J. (1995). Union Contracts and the Life-Cycle/Permanent-Income Hypothesis. American Economic Review, 85 (1):186-200.
13. Thirlwall, A. (2002). The mobilization of savings for growth and development in developing countries. Icfai University Journal of Applied Economics, I(1), 7-30.
14. World Bank (2022). Gross Savings (% GDP). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/ indicator/NY.GNS.ICTR.ZS
15. World Population Review (2023). Gross National Savings Rate by Country. Retrieved from http://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/savings-rate-by-country
16. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy (2023). (State Statistics Service of Ukraine). Valovyi vnutrishnii produkt (Gross domestic product (1990-2021)). Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
17. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy (2023). (State Statistics Service of Ukraine). Dokhody ta vytraty naselennia (2005-2021) (Household income and expenditure). Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
18. Kriuchkova I. V. (2019). Norma valovoho zaoshchadzhennia: teoriia ta praktyka (The rate of gross savings: theory and practice). Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia (Economics and forecasting), No. 3, 7-39. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2019.03.007
https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2019.03.007
19. Makedon H.M. (2020). Makroekonomichna rol zaoshchadzhen domashnikh hospodarstv (Macroeconomic role of household savings). Intelekt ХХІ (Intelligence ХХІ), No. 3, 39-43. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8801/2020-3.8
https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8801/2020-3.8
20. Melykh O. (2020). Kredytna povedinka domohospodarstv: strukturno-analitychnyi aspekt (Credit behavior of households: structural and analytical aspect). Svit finansiv (The world of finance), No. 1 (58), 7-18
https://doi.org/10.35774/sf2019.01.007
21. Tropina V. B. (2016). Zaoshchadzhennia naselennia yak osnova formuvannia investytsiinoho potentsialu domohospodarstv (Savings of the population as a basis for forming the investment potential of households). Ekonomika ta derzhava (Economy and the state), No. 1, 18-21.
22. Tsytok R. P. (2019). Zrostannia kapitalnykh investytsii vid chystykh zaoshchadzhen ta yikh vplyv na VVP v Ukraini (Growth of capital investments from net savings and their impact on GDP in Ukraine). Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia : Ekonomika (Bulletin of Odessa National University. Series: Economy), Vol. 24, No. 2, 32-35. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vonu_econ_2019_24_2_8