Simultaneous surrogate modeling and dimension reduction using unsupervised learning. Application to parametric wing shape optimization

2024;
: pp. 154–165
https://doi.org/10.23939/mmc2024.01.154
Received: May 31, 2023
Revised: February 16, 2024
Accepted: February 18, 2024

Karafi Y., Moussaoui Z., Abou El Majd B.  Simultaneous surrogate modeling and dimension reduction using unsupervised learning. Application to parametric wing shape optimization.  Mathematical Modeling and Computing. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 154–165 (2024)

1
LMSA Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University in Rabat
2
LMSA Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University in Rabat
3
LMSA Laboratory, Faculty of Science, Mohammed V University in Rabat; University of Lille, 59655 Villeneuve–d'Ascq, France

This paper presents a machine-learning-based approach that enables simultaneous surrogate modeling and dimension reduction and applies it to aerodynamic parametric shape optimization.  Aerodynamic shape optimization is a crucial process in various industries, including aerospace, automotive, and renewable energy.  It involves iteratively improving the properties of a system by evaluating an objective function and driving its minimization or maximization using an optimization algorithm.  However, the evaluation of aerodynamic objective functions requires computationally expensive operations, such as solving complex fluid dynamics equations and calculating performance metrics like lift and drag coefficients.  This computational cost becomes particularly burdensome when derivative-free optimization algorithms need to evaluate numerous samples per iteration.  Additionally, when the design space dimension is high, the efficiency and effectiveness of the optimization process decrease.  To address these challenges, the paper proposes combining surrogate modeling and dimension reduction.  Surrogate modeling constructs a reduced order model that approximates the coefficients of interest in a cost-effective manner, while dimension reduction identifies the most relevant design space dimensions using techniques like Proper Orthogonal Decomposition.  The paper suggests an integrative approach that employs Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Unsupervised Learning, specifically AutoEncoder networks, to simultaneously build a surrogate model and reduce the problem dimension.  This technique is applied to optimize the shape of an airplane wing aerofoil under trans-sonic flight conditions. The wing shape is parameterized using Free Form Deformation (FFD).  The paper demonstrates that the suggested approach enables rapid and effective shape optimization.

  1. Lyu Z., Kenway G. K. W., Martins J. R. R. A.  Aerodynamic shape optimization investigations of the Common Research Model wing benchmark.  AIAA Journal.  53 (4), 968–985 (2015).
  2. Wu X., Zhang W., Song S.  Robust aerodynamic shape design based on an adaptive stochastic optimization framework.  Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.  57 (3), 639–651 (2018).
  3. Han Z.-H., Görtz S.  Hierarchical Kriging Model for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling.  AIAA Journal.  50 (9), 1885–1896 (2012).
  4. Boutemedjet A., Samardžić M., Rebhi L., Rajić Z., Mouada T.  UAV aerodynamic design involving genetic algorithm and artificial neural network for wing preliminary computation.  Aerospace Science and Technology.  84, 464–483 (2019).
  5. Liao P., Song W., Du P., Zhao H.  Multi-fidelity convolutional neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic optimization based on transfer learning.  Physics of Fluids.  33 (12), 127121 (2021).
  6. Tao J., Sun G., Guo L, Wang X.  Application of a PCA-DBN-based surrogate model to robust aerodynamic design optimization.  Chinese Journal of Aeronautics.  33 (6), 1573–1588 (2020).
  7. Kou J., Botero-Bolivar L., Ballano R., Marino O,, de Santana L., Valero E., Ferrer E.  Aeroacoustic airfoil shape optimization enhanced by autoencoders.  Expert Systems with Applications.  217, 119513 (2023).
  8. Deng K., Chen H., Zhang Y.  Flow structure oriented optimization aided by deep neural network. 10th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics. ICCFD10-289 (2018).
  9. Wu H., Liu X., An W., Chen S., Lyu H.  A deep learning approach for efficiently and accurately evaluating the flow field of supercritical airfoils.  Computers & Fluids.  198, 104393 (2020).
  10. Moussaoui Z., Karafi Y., Abou El Majd B.  Robust shape optimization using artificial neural networks based surrogate modeling for an aircraft wing.  Mathematical Modeling and Computing.  11 (1), 139–153 (2023).
  11. Du X., He P., Martins J. R. R. A.  Rapid airfoil design optimization via neural networks-based parameterization and surrogate modeling.  Aerospace Science and Technology.  113, 106701 (2021).
  12. Moussaoui Z., El Bakkali H., Karafi Y., Abou El Majd B.  Bayesian Approach for Aerodynamic Shape Robust Optimization.  Proceedings of the IISE Annual Conference. Preprint (2023).
  13. Coppedè A., Gaggero S., Vernengo G., Villa D.  Hydrodynamic shape optimization by high fidelity CFD solver and Gaussian process-based response surface method.  Applied Ocean Research.  90, 101841 (2019).
  14. Sederberg T., Parry S.  Free-Form Deformation of Solid Geometric Models.  ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics.  20 (4), 151–160 (1986).
  15. Abou El Majd B., Désidéri J.-A., Janka A.  Nested and selfadaptive B\'ezier parameterizations for shape optimization.  International Conference on Control, Partial Differential Equations and Scientific Computing  (dedicated to late Professor J. L. Lions), Beijing, China, 13–16, September 2004.
  16. Abou El Majd B.  Parameterization adaption for 3D shape optimization in aerodynamics.  International Journal of Science and Engineering.  6 (1), 61–69 (2014).
  17. Eberhart R., Kennedy J.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory.  MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science. 39–43 (1995).