The development of the information society has an impact not only on the quality of life of people, but also on the formation of new communication links. The rapid penetration of information technology into different areas of our lives has contributed to the global spread of the Internet, in which social networks are actively used for communication. For advertisers, social networks provide unique opportunities for rapid dissemination of information and direct contact with consumers. The specifics of advertising communication are not only informing the recipient about goods or services, but also influencing him/her through various means. The article raises the problem of discourse of social networks, where various manipulative strategies, tactics and techniques of influence are used when communicating in virtual space. Attention is focused on communicative and pragmatic techniques of manipulative influence on the consciousness of consumers in Ukrainian-language advertising texts of the social network “Facebook”. It is noted that in order to implement the strategy of manipulative influence, advertisers resort to various tactics. The most common of them is the transaccentuation tactic, which consists in forming a positive mood through shifting the emphasis from buying the advertised product or service to receiving pleasant emotions and sensations. Transaccentuation is most often transferred to a feeling of joy, happiness, comfort, peace, help, the absence of obstacles. A value-oriented tactic is also used, which is aimed at activating positive value guidelines in the mind of the addressee and their association with the advertised product or service. In analyzed advertising texts, the following basic values are most often manipulated: freedom, security, rest, family. Less common is the tactic of masking – the creation in an advertising message of such a position of the addressee, which allows you to play different roles in order to transfer communication with the addressee to the plane of personal communication (position of the mentor, interlocutor, adviser).
1. Areshenkova O. (2018). Komunikatyvno-praghmatychni ta stylistychni parametry reklamnogho tekstu: monoghrafija. Kryvyі Rih : FOP Marynchenko S. V. 176 р. [in Ukrainian].
2. Dzhygha T. (2003). Metody ta tekhnologhiji vplyvu politychnoji reklamy: na prykladi peredvybornoji kampaniji : avtoref. dys. … kand. polit. nauk. Kyiv. nac. un-t im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Кyiv. 21 р. [in Ukrainian].
3. Zirka V. (2005). Movna paradyghma manipuljatyvnoji ghry v reklami : avtoref. dys. ... d-ra filol. nauk; In-t movoznavstva im. O. O. Potebni NAN Ukrajiny. Кyiv. 32 р. [in Ukrainian].
4. Karpchuk N. (2009). Manipuljatyvni tekhnologhiji v reklami. Naukovyj visnyk Volynsjkogho nacionaljnogho universytetu im. Lesi Ukrajinky. Serija: Filologhichni nauky. Praghmalinghvistyka. No. 11. Р. 118-121 [in Ukrainian].
5. Kyrychuk L. (2012). Manipuljatyvnyj potencial implicytnoji ocinky v reklami. Naukovi zapysky nacionaljnogho universytetu "Ostrozjka akademija". Ser.: Filologhichna. No. 26. Р. 126-127. URL : http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nznuoaf_2012_26_40 (data zvernennja: 15.10.2022) [in Ukrainian].
6. Kudrjavceva L., Djadechko L., Dorofejeva O. (2005). Suchasni aspekty doslidzhennja mas-medijnogho dyskursu: ekspresija - vplyv - manipuljacija. Movoznavstvo. No. 1. Р. 59-66 [in Ukrainian].
7. Kutuza N. (2007). Ghipnotychni tekhniky v reklamnomu dyskursi. Uchenыe zapysky Tavrycheskogho nacyonaljnogho unyversyteta ym. V. Y. Vernadskogho. Seryja: Fylologhyja. T. 20. No. 3. Р. 439-444 [in Ukrainian].
8. Lojko V. (2011). Do pytannja manipuljaciji suspiljnoju svidomistju u politychnomu dyskursi ZMI. Visnyk Zhytomyrsjkogho derzhavnogho universytetu. No. 57. Р. 179-181 [in Ukrainian].
9. Makjedonova O. P. (2017). Linghvostylistychna orghanizacija ta praghmatychne funkcionuvannja anghlijsjkomovnogho reklamnogho tekstu : dys. … kand. filol. nauk. Zaporizhzhja. 229 р. [in Ukrainian].
10. Ostroushko O. (2005). Politychna reklama: manipuljacija masovoju svidomistju. Aktualjni problemy filologhiji i metodyky vykladannja mov. Kryvyі Rih. Р. 145-156 [in Ukrainian].
11. Pustovit T., Kreshhenko M. (2019). Movni zasoby zdijsnennja prykhovanogho vplyvu u politychnij reklamiю. Materialy XLVIII naukovo-tekhnichnoji konferenciji pidrozdiliv Vinnycjkogho nacionaljnogho tekhnichnogho universytetu : zbirnyk dopovidej. Vinnytsia : VNTU. Р. 173-175 [in Ukrainian].
12. Romanjuk S. (2013). Zasoby realizaciji movlennjevogho vplyvu v amerykansjkij komercijnij zhurnaljnij reklami 1925-2010 rr. : avtoref. dys. ... kand. filol. Nauk ; Kharkiv. nac. un-t im. Kharkiv. 20 р. [in Ukrainian].
13. Ruda O. (2012). Movne pytannja jak ob'jekt manipuljatyvnykh strateghij u suchasnomu ukrajinsjkomu politychnomu dyskursi : monoghrafija NAN Ukrajiny, Instytut ukrajinsjkoji movy. Кyiv. 2012. 232 р. [in Ukrainian].
14. Stasula N. (2011). Elektronni zasoby vyjavlennja verbaljnoji manipuljaciji v ZMI. Visnyk nacionaljnogho universytetu "Ljvivsjka politekhnika" : zb. nauk. Pracj. No. 694. URL : http://vlp.com.ua/node/6319 (data zvernennja: 12.11.2022) [in Ukrainian].
15. Sotnykov A. (2016). Manipuljatyvnyj vplyv u suchasnomu media-dyskursi. Naukovyj visnyk DDPU imeni I. Franka. Serija: "Filologhichni nauky". Movoznavstvo. T. 2. No. 5. Р. 104-107 [in Ukrainian].
16. Tepla O. (2011). Praghmonimy jak zasoby movnogho manipuljuvannja. Studia Linguistica. No. 5. Р. 274- 278 [in Ukrainian].
17. Facebook. URL : https://uk-ua.facebook.com (data zvernennja: 10.01.2020 - 30.12.2022).