Agriculture Vehicles Predictive Maintenance With Telemetry, Maintenance History and Geospatial Data

2024;
: pp. 134 - 139
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Department of Computerized Automatic Systems
2
Lviv Politechnic National University

Timely detection and prevention of agriculture vehicles malfunctions are key approaches to reducing maintenance costs, as well as updating and replacing equipment, and reducing the cost of growing agricultural crops. In this article an approach for Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction that utilizes a combination of telemetry, maintenance, and geospatial data (such as weather and terrain information) as input to a Long Short- Term Memory (LSTM) algorithm has been considered. The results have shown that the models trained on the dataset enriched with geospatial data outperformed the models that relied solely on telemetry and maintenance data, demonstrating the benefits of including location-specific factors. However, the model’s RUL prediction applicability for electric and hydraulic systems needs further exploration due to the current dataset limitations.

  1. Paman, Ujang & Khairizal, Khairizal & Sutriana, Selvia. (2022). Investigating Farm  Machinery Breakdowns and Service Support System Conditions in Rainfed Rice Areas in Riau Province, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, vol. 12, no. 3, pp.  182-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55493/5005.v12i3.4578.
  2. Dahab, Mohamed & Gafar, Montasir & Al-Gailani, Abdul Qader. (2021). Repair and Maintenance Cost Estimation for Two Power Sizes of Agricultural Tractors as Affected by Hours of Use and Age in Years: A Case Study, Dongola Area, Sudan. Journal of Engineering Research and   Reports,    vol.    20,    no.    10,    pp.    113-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2021/v20i1017395.
  3. Vytoptova V.A. (2024). Study of the state and problems of agriculture in Ukraine in wartime conditions. Agrarian Innovations,    no.    23     (2024),      pp.     210-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2024.23.30.
  4. Dube, Aryaa. (2024). Application of Deep Learning in Predictive Maintenance of Aircraft Engines. Darpan International Research Analysis, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 83-100.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.36676/dira.v12.i3.58.
  5. Crespo  del Castillo, Adolfo  & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar. (2024). Dynamic Fleet  management:  integrating predictive and preventive maintenance with operation workload balance to minimise cost.  Reliability Engineering     &     System      Safety,      vol.      249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110243.
  6. Spinelli, Raffaele & Eliasson, Lars &  Magagnotti, Natascia. (2019). Determining the repair and maintenance cost of wood chippers. Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 122, pp. 202-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.024.
  7. A. Bukhsh, Zaharah & Saeed, Aaqib & Stipanovic, Irina & Dorée, André. (2019). Predictive maintenance using tree-based classification techniques: A case of railway switches. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 101, pp. 35-54. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.trc.2019.02.001.
  8. Xiao, Maohua & Wang, Weichen & Wang, Kaixin & Zhang, Wei Zhang, Hengtong. (2020). Fault Diagnosis of High-Power Tractor Engine Based on Competitive Multiswarm Cooperative Particle Swarm Optimizer Algorithm. Shock and Vibration. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2020/8829257.
  9. Li, Dan & Zheng, Yi & Zhao, Wei. (2019). Fault Analysis System for Agricultural Machinery Based on Big Data. IEEE     Access,     vol.      7,      pp.      99136-99151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928973.
  10. Gouvea, Carlos & Sá, José. (2019). Diagnostic of Failure in Transmission System of Agriculture Tractors Using Predictive Maintenance Based Software. AgriEngineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 132-144. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/agriengineering1010010.