The aim of this work is to evaluate the accuracy of determining the wet component of zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) from GNSS-measurements and the accuracy of determining the hydrostatic component according to the Saastamoinen model in comparison with the radio sounding data as well. Zenith tropospheric delay is determined mainly by two methods - traditional, using radio sounding or using atmospheric models, such as the Saastamoinen model, and the method of GNSS measurements. Determination of the hydrostatic component of the zenith tropospheric delay was performed by radio sounding data obtained at the aerological station Praha-Libus in 2011-2013 and in 2018. Data were processed for the middle decades of January and July of each year at 0h o’clock of the Universal Time. The wet component was calculated from GNSS observations. By a significant number of radio soundings at the Praha-Libus aerological station, hydrostatic and wet components of zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) and the same number of ZTD values derived for the corresponding time intervals from GNSS measurements at the GOPE reference station were determined. The values of the wet component of ZTD were determined and compared with the corresponding data obtained from radio soundings. We found that the error of the hydrostatic component in winter does not exceed 10 mm in absolute value, and in summer it is approximately 1.5 times smaller. This is due to differences in the stratification of the troposphere and lower stratosphere in winter and summer. As for the wet component of ZTD, its errors do not exceed: in winter 15 mm, in summer – 35 mm. The resulting differences in summer have a negative sign, indicating a systematic shift, and in winter – both negative and positive. Today, there are many studies aimed at improving the accuracy of determining zenith tropospheric delay by both Ukrainian and foreign authors, but the problem of the accuracy of the hydrostatic component remains open. The study provides recommendations for further research to improve the accuracy of zenith tropospheric delay.
1. Department of atmospheric science. University of Wyoming, USA [Access mode]: http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html.
2. Hadas, T., Hobiger, T., & Hordyniec, P. (2020). Considering different recent advancements in GNSS on real-time zenith troposphere estimates. GPS Solutions, Vol. 24:99, 9 p.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01014-w
3. Hdidou, F. Z., Mordane, S., & Sbii, S. (2018). Global positioning systems meteorology over Morocco: accuracy assessment and comparison of zenith tropospheric delay from global positioning systems and radiosondes. Meteorological applications, 25(4), 606-613.
https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1725
4. Kablak, N. I. (2010). Atmospheric impact assessment in the network of active reference GNSS stations. Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography, 73,. 17-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819154-5.00034-5
5. Kladochnyi, B., & Palyanytsia, B. (2020). Comparison of annual changes of zenith tropospheric delay components, calculated according to the atmospheric sounding data and by analytic model. Modern achievements of geodetic science and industry, 41, 46-54.
https://doi.org/10.33841/1819-1339-1-41-46-54
6. Mendes, V. B. (1999). Modeling the neutral-atmosphere propagaton delay in radiometric space techniques. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics EngineeringTechnical Report. № 199. University of Nev Brunswick, Fredericton, Nev Brunswick, Canada. P. 353
7. Palianytsia, B., Oliynyk, V., & Boyko, V. (2016). The research of change of zenith troposperic dealay's components. Geodesy, Cartography and Aerial Photography, 83, 13-20.
https://doi.org/10.23939/istcgcap2016.01.013
8. Saastamoinen, J. (1972). Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging of satellites. The Use of Artificial Satellites for Geodesy, Geophysics. Monogr. Ser., Vol.15, AGU, Washington, D. C., Р.247251.
https://doi.org/10.1029/GM015p0247
9. Schueler, T. (2002) Tropospheric Correction Services for GNSS Users. Concepts, Status and Future Prospects. University FAF Munich, Germany, 9 p.
10. Tropospheric GNSS measurement files, internet source [Access mode]: https://cddis.nasa.gov/archive/gps/products/troposphere/new/.
11. Zablotskyi, F. D. (2013). GNSS-meteorology: textbook. Lviv: Nat. un. "Lviv polytechnic", 95 p.
12. Zablotskyi, F. D.(2002). Features of the formation of the wet component of tropospheric delay in different regions. Modern achievements of geodetic science and industry, Coll. of sci. works, Lviv: Liga-Press, P. 121-127.
13. Zablotskyi, F. D., & Palyanytsia B. B. (2004). Modified models for determining the dry component of zenith tropospheric delay int the south-western region of Ukraine. Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography, 65, 51-56.
14. Zablotskyi, F. D., Palyanytsia, B. B., Matvienko, L. V., & Turchyn, N. M. (2011). Dry and wet components of zenith tropospheric delay. Modern achievements of geodetic science and industry, Coll. of sci. works, Lviv: Liga-Press, P. 92-95.
15. Zheng, F., Lou, Y., Gu, S., Gong, X., & Shi, C. (2018). Modeling tropospheric wet delays with national GNSS reference network in China for BeiDou precise point positioning. Journal of Geodesy, 92(5), 545-560.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1080-4
16. Zus, F., Douša, J., Kačmařík, M., Václavovic, P., Balidakis, K., Dick, G., & Wickert, J. (2019). Improving GNSS zenith wet delay interpolation by utilizing tropospheric gradients: Experiments with a dense station network in Central Europe in the warm season. Remote Sensing, 11(6), 674.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060674