Meta-anthropological paradigms of the antinomy of the philosophy of law
In the antinomian theory, a significant place is given to the anthropological features of a person. Such a statement takes place because human beings in law often, even sometimes unquestionably, focus on the fact that the main thing for them is the bodily nature of existence. Then all attention is directed to the fact that bodily behavior decides the righteousness or non-righteousness of life, and antinations are sought in this theory, which does not lead to a deontological result.
Why does this state occur?