The article defines the concept of procedural complicity. Reveals the characteristics and types of procedural complicity in administrative proceedings. The peculiarities of the Institute of procedural complicity in foreign countries. Proposed amendments to the Code of administrative procedure of Ukraine.
1. Administrativno-procedurela wof Latv ia from October 25, 2001]. Cbornikzakonoda tel’nyhaktovotdel’nyhgosudarstvpoadministrativnojjusticiiAlmaty, 2012, 339–452 рр.
2. Administrativnoprocessual’nyj kodeks Azerbajdzhanskoj Respublikiot 30 ijunja 2009 goda No. 846-ІІІO [TheadministrativeproceduralcodeoftheAzerbaijanRepublicdated 30 June, 2009 No. 846-A]. Cbornikzakonodatel’nyhaktovotdel’nyhgosudarstvpoadministrativnojjusticiiAlmaty, 2012, 11–60 рр.
3. Bevzenko V. M. Insty’tut procesual’noyispivuchasti v administraty’vnomu sudochy’nstvi Ukrayiny’: sutnist’ ta pravove regulyuvannya. Derzhava i pravo, 2010, Vol. 47, 222–227 рр.
4. Grazhdanskij processual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federaciiot 14 dekabrja 2002 g. [Civil procedural code of the Russian Federation from December 14, 2002]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570/.
5. Polozhenie ob administrativnyh sudah [The position of administrative courts].TheLawOfGermanyonMarch 29, 2012.
6. Karmazina L.P. Pravovy’j status vidpovidacha pid chas pereglyadu rishen’ u spravax pro administraty’vni pravoporushennya administraty’vny’my’ sudamy’, Diss, kand.yury’d. nauk [The legal status of the defendant during the review of decisions on Affairs about administrative offences administrative courts. Cand. legal. sci. diss.]. Dnepropetrovsk, 2015.204 р.
7. Kivalov S.V. Teorety’ko-pravova xaraktery’sty’ka procesual’nogo statusu storin v administraty’vnomu sudochy’nstvi (Theoretical and legal characteristics of the procedural status of the parties in administrative proceedings), Odessa, PhoenixPubl., 2015. 232 р.
8. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Respubliki Armenija ot 28 nojabrja 2007 g. [The code of administrative procedure of the Republic of Armenia from November 28, 2007].Collectionoflegislativeactsofindividual StatesintheadministrationofjusticeofAlmaty, 2012, 61–128 рр.
9. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossijskoj Federaci [The code of administrative procedure of the Russian Federation]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_176147/. 10. Kodeks administraty’vnogo sudochy’nstva Ukrayiny’ [The code of administrative proceedings of Ukraine] onJuly 06, 2005.
11. Koxan A.S. Rozvy’tok ponyattya “procesual’na spivuchast’” v administraty’vnomu procesi (Thedevelopmentoftheconceptof “procedural participation” intheadministrative process). Available at: http://irbisnbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21D... = UJRN&IMAGE_ FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/FP_index.htm_2013_1_85.pdf.
12. Kravchuk V.M. Naukovo-prakty’chny’j komentar do Kodeksu administraty’vnogo sudochy’nstva Ukrayiny’(ScientificpracticalcommentarytotheCodeofadministrativeprocedureofUkraine), Kharkov, TheFactorPubl., 2011. 800 р.
13. Uxvala Yevpatorijs’kogo mis’kogo sudu Avtonomnoyi Respubliky’ Kry’m u spravi No. 2-128/2009r vid 25 bereznya 2009 roku [The resolution of the Evpatoria city court of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea in case No. 2-128/2009 of 25 March 2009.]. Availableat: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/5858304.
14. Uxvala Zavods’kogo rajonnogo sudu m. Dniprodzerzhy’ns’ka Dnipropetrovs’koyi oblasti u spravi No. 208/2461/15-a vid 27 bereznya 2015 roku.[Definition of Factory district court of Dneprodzerzhinsk of Dnipropetrovsk region on business No. 208/2461/15-as of March 27, 2015..]. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/43291601.
15. Uxvala Znamyans’kogo mis’k rajonnogo sudu Kirovograds’koyi oblasti u spravi No. 2-a/389/8/16 vid 28 bereznya 2016 roku[Definition znam’ians’ke district court of the Kirovograd region on business No. 2- a/389/8/16 28 March 2016]. Available at: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/56742605.
16. Filippov S. A. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskieaspektygrazhdanskogoprocessual’nogosouchastija, Diss, kand.yury’d. nauk [Theoretical and practical aspects of civil procedural co-participation. Cand. legal. sci. diss.]. Saratov, 2011, 29 р.