Aim. To develop and accomplish an experimental testing of the method of creating a mask map of high-level terrain objects. Methodology. On the basis of the cross-correlation method, it is proposed to carry out the estimation of the similarity of orthophotos that have a mutual spatial overlap. The comparison of the left and right images takesplace in pixels, for pixels with the same spatial coordinates X and Y, and therefore, there is no need to organize the movement of the search bar and to search for the corresponding points as such. It also removes the limit on the size of the image – the standard. In addition, the relatively small cross-correlation sensitivity to the differences in the illumination of the scene is very important for the choice of the correlation coefficient as a measure for the comparison of images. Taking into consideration the perspective deformations of images of high-level terrain objects it is expected that the number of pixels with negative comparison is significantly higher for regions with images of such objects. The overall picture throughout the study is a map-mask of high-level terrain objects. Such a map can be formed with the help of geoinformation modeling of polygonal objects, which outline zones with a high compaction of pixels with a negative comparison result. Results. The considered method of creating a map-mask of high-level terrain objects provides a possibility of obtaining important information about the quality of the digital topographic surface model used for orthotransformation of aerial photographs. The revealed effect of compaction points with a negative result of the mutual comparison of orthogonal images by the cross-correlation method allows to identify and establish the spatial location of high-level terrain objects such as roofs of buildings, fences, power lines, crowns of trees, and shrubs. Practical meaning. An example of map-mask application of high-level terrain objects for orthoimage stitching is given.
- 1. Goshtasby, A. A. (2005). 2-D and 3-D Image Registration for Medical, Remote Sensing, and Industrial Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Baltsavias, E. & Käser, Ch. (1998). DTM and orthoimage generation - a thorough analysis and comparison of four digital photogrammetric systems. IAPRS, 32, Part 4, Stuttgart, FRG.
3. Bielski, C., Grazzini, J., & Soille, P. (2007). Automated morphological image composition for mosaicing large image data sets. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 4068-4071. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4423743
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4423743
4. Chen, Q., Sun, M., Hu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2019) An improved approach for generating globally consistent seamline networks for aerial image mosaicking. doi:10.3390/rs61212334. Available from:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328227601_An_improved_approach_... [accessed Apr 23 2019]
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1519282
5. Georgopoulos, A., & Skarlatos, D. (2003). A novel method for automating the checking and correction of digital elevation models using orthophotographs. The Photogrammetric Record. 18. 156-163. doi:10.1111/0031-868X.t01-1-00015.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0031-868X.t01-1-00015
6. Kerschner, M. (2000). Twin snakes for determining seam lines in orthoimage mosaicking. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXIII, Part B4. Amsterdam 2000, 454-461
7. Li P., Dong Y., Hu Y., Li X., & Tan P. (2018). A method for the seamlines network automatic selection based on building vector. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XLII-3. 909-913. 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-909-2018.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-909-2018
8. Remondino, F., Spera, M.G., Nocerino E., Menna F., Nex F., & Gonizzi B. S. (2013). Dense image matching: Comparisons and analyses. IEEE Proc. Digital Heritage Conference. Marceille, France, 2013. doi:10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743712.
https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743712
9. Demianov, V. V., & Saveleva, E. A. (2010). Geostatistics. Theory and practice. Nauka.
10. Dorozhynskyi, O. L., & Tukai, R. (2008). Fotogrammetric. Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House.
11. Instruction on topographic scaling 1: 5000, 1: 2000, 1: 1000 and 1: 500. (HKNTA-2.04-02-98), Order of the Main Department of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre under the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. No. 56 dated 09.04.98. (in the wording of 27.07.99)
12. Kadnychanskyi, S. A. (2010). Substantiation of the requirements for the digital elevation model for orthophototransformation of aerial and satellite images. Yzvestyia vysshykh uchebnykh zavedenyi heodezyia y aэrofotosemka. 5, 49-54.
13. Dorozhynskyi, O. L. (2015). Mathematical models of analytical and space photogrammetry. Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House.
14. Chybunychev, A. A. (2002). Construction of digital orthoimages taking into account the heights of artificial structures. Yzvestyia vysshykh uchebnykh zavedenyi. Heodezyia y aerofotosemka. 6, 76-81