freedom of conscience

Features of the Principle of Legal Equality of Religious Organizations in Ukraine

The article identifies the features of the principle of legal equality of religious organizations in Ukraine, since freedom of religion is based on the equality before the law of different religious organizations and, first of all, believers. However, the declared equality before the law is valid only in state-legal relations, while in the socio-political dimension it is somewhat conditional.

The Right to Freedom of Religion: Problems of Implementation During the War in Ukraine

This article analyzes the possibilities for exercising the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion in Ukraine during martial law. It emphasizes that although Ukraine is a secular state with constitutionally enshrined separation of church and state, this does not negate its obligations to ensure this right. On the contrary, the secular nature of the state requires a set of legal and organizational measures to guarantee everyone’s right to freedom of belief.

Judicial bodies as subjects of the system of administrative and legal guarantee of the activities of religious organizations in Ukraine

The article characterizes the peculiarities of the functioning of judicial bodies as subjects of the system of administrative and legal guarantee of the activity of religious organizations in Ukraine. Implementation by judicial bodies of administrative and legal guarantees of the activities of religious organizations is carried out by the system of courts of general jurisdiction, administrative courts, and the Supreme Court of Ukraine, acting on the same basis, regarding the implementation of joint tasks in the sphere of justice.

Some reflections on the judge’s right to conscientious objection

The objective of the article is to explore the legal viability of the judge’s right to conscientious objection. As a potential legal basis of such a right are considered the fundamental right to freedom of conscience, religion and belief, as well as statutory provisions on disqualification of a judge from adjudicating on a given case. Furthermore, the author deals with the question of whether the judge’s right to conscientious objection is compatible with the principle of their subjection to the law in force.