people

З’ясовано сутність народного суверенітету як правового феномену та запропоновано його авторське визначення для науки конституційного права. Доведено, що “народний суверенітет” є складним правовим поняттям, яке складається з двох взаємопов’язаних та взаємодоповнювальних елементів – “суверенітет” та “народ”, які формують цілісну правову категорію, яка одночасно є основоположним принципом сучасного конституціоналізму.

Висвітлено панівні у вітчизняній та світовій науковій думці підходи щодо сутності
поняття “нація”, його змісту й обсягу, часу появи, а також взаємозв’язку з поняттями
“етнос” і “народ”. Наголошено на тому, що поняття “нація” найчастіше корелює з
поняттями “етнос” і “народ”. Висловлено думку, що нація – це народ, піднесений
запасом державницьких сил, наділений змогою до самоідентифікації й відмежування від
інших націй державними кордонами, а також-інтегрування інших націй до складу своєї
держави на правах національних меншин.

The prevailing approaches in the domestic and world scientific thought are the
approaches to the essence of the concept of «nation», its content and volume, the time of
appearance, as well as the relationship with the concepts of «ethnos» and «people». It is
emphasized that the concept of «nation» most often correlates with the concepts of «ethnos»
and «people». The idea is that the nation is a people that is exalted by the stockpile of state
forces, endowed with the ability to identify and separate from other nations the state borders,

On the basis of substantial approach analyzes the problem of formation of the person. The basic social and environmental determinants of human formation and thus proved the continuity of their relationships and the very convention division. Analyzed the relationship between the concepts of “social”, “society”, “culture”, done by analyzing a large amount of literature reasoned conclusions on theoretical controversies regarding scientific interpretations of the aforementioned concepts.

In the article the problem of personality in the philosophy of classical rationalism. It was found that in the active practice of human personality is formed and manifested in his work as a subjective being as such i consciously creates its relation to nature and to other people, establishing certain communications and public relations, responsible for their action.

In the article the concept of human personality built on the basic ideas of the leading right-wing philosophical schools. We consider the notion of "personalism" and the characteristics of its importance in contemporary philosophy. Researched historical basis and development of ideas of personalism and personalistic analyzes the major trends taking into account the characteristics of their basic philosophical concepts of representatives. The methods and the most important categories which uses existentialism in the interpretation of the rights and specificity of its existence.

The article investigates human behavior as an object of philosophical and legal reflection “activity” and “activity”. Modified the problem motivated and achieve value-oriented human behavior, acting peculiar social processes substance of human life in all spheres of public life. Deals behavior primarily as a category of social philosophy, which includes objectives, means and results of the process of form.

The problem of violence in politics and practice of Stalin’s totalitarian regime, the gist of
which lied in the physical destruction, moral and psychological oppression and conquest of all
citizens of the state is analysed.
The effective methods of the implementation of this programme were the politics and
practice of violence, repressions, terror and fear, the lack of human’s rights before the Soviet
authorities.

The article examines the place and role of the national state and the substance of the creative process. Particular attention is paid to the national spirit, national mentality and national consciousness of the individual in public-power mechanisms. Attempting to determine the national substance in transformational paradigm of modern society.

Article is devoted to the formulation of one of the most pressing problems in the philosophical and legal study of the social responsibility of man, namely the problem of sociolegal paradigm value of responsibility and irresponsibility. The purpose of this paper is to emphasize both theorists and practitioners for positioning accents in the scientific and practical relevance of this type of interaction. The author gives some ideas on philosophical and legal understanding of the legal paradigm of responsibility and irresponsibility.