Prediction of geoid heights using the MLP ANN method at a regional scale

The aim of this study is to construct a regional geoid model using the MLP ANN method and to assess its accuracy with GNSS–levelling data for the Vinnytsia region, both within and without the application of the “Remove–Compute–Restore” procedure. Method. The construction of a geoid model using artificial neural networks (ANN) is a modern approach that integrates classical geodetic methods with intelligent data processing technologies. The main idea is to apply machine learning algorithms to establish nonlinear relationships between various input geophysical parameters and the geoid height. An ANN can be considered as a set of artificial neurons with local processing capability, which are connected according to a specific topology.  This topology defines how these neurons are linked, and there is also a learning rule that governs the network's operation. Among various ANN models, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) is particularly popular. The MLP consists of an input layer (neurons that receive external stimulation, one or more hidden layers, and an output layer which provides the network’s result. When computing regional or local geoid models using the MLP ANN method, it is advisable to apply the “Remove–Compute–Restore” procedure. Results. A geoid model was computed using GNSS–levelling data for the Vinnytsia region, both with and without the “Remove–Compute–Restore” procedure. The accuracy of the resulting models was evaluated using independent datasets. The standard deviation of the model obtained with the “Remove–Compute–Restore” procedure, when compared with independent data, was approximately 1.8 cm, which corresponds well with the accuracy of the input data (geoid heights derived from GNSS–levelling). In contrast, the model constructed without applying this procedure showed significantly poorer accuracy, with a standard deviation of approximately 3.7 cm. Scientific novelty and practical significance of this work lie in assessing the accuracy of a regional geoid model constructed using the MLP ANN method, both with and without the “Remove–Compute–Restore” procedure. The proposed approach can be recommended for computing regional and local geoid models.

  1. Albayrak, M., Özlüdemir, M. T., Aref, M. M. & Halicioglu, K. (2020). Determination of Istanbul geoid using GNSS/levelling and valley cross levelling data. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 11(3), 163-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2020.01.003
  2. Barthelmes, F. & Köhler, W., 2016: International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM), in: Drewes, H., Kuglitsch, F., Adám, J. et al., The Geodesists Handbook 2016, Journal of Geodesy (2016), 90(10), pp 907-1205,doi: 10.1007/s00190-016-0948-z
  3. Berkant Konakoglu and Alper Akar (2021). Geoid Undulation using ANNs (RBFNN and GRNN), multiple linear regression (MLR) and interpolation methods: A comparative Study. Earth Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 25, No. 4, December 2021, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v25n4.91195
  4. Cakir, L. & Yilmaz, N. (2014). Polynomials, radial basis functions and multilayer perceptron neural network methods in local geoid determination with GPS/levelling. Measurement, 57, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.003
  5. Dzhuman B. Gravimetric geoid model determination of Central Ukraine area using combination of LSC and truncated SHA methods. Acta Geodyn. Geomater., 20, No. 1 (209), 1–9, 2023. DOI: 10.13168/AGG.2023.0001
  6. Kamal Abdellatif Sami, Ammar Mohammed Maryod Aborida. (2022). On the Evaluation of the Neural Network Khartoum Geoid Model. American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 7(4), 147-151. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20230802.12
  7. Lars E. Sjöberg, Mohammad Bagherbandi (2017), Gravity Inversion and Integration Theory and Applications in Geodesy and Geophysics. Library of Congress Control Number: 2016963159, Springer International Publishing AG 2017
  8. Lin, L. S. (2007). Application of a back-propagation artificial neural network to regional grid-based geoid model generation using GPS and leveling data. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 133(2), 81-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2007)133:2(81)
  9. Pavlis N. An Earth Gravitational Model to Degree 2160: EGM2008 / N. Pavlis, S. Holmes, S. Kenyon, J. Factor – Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10, EGU2008–A–01891, EGU General Assembly, 2008.
  10. Sjöberg, L. A discussion on the approximations made in the practical implementation of the remove–compute–restore technique in regional geoid modelling. J Geodesy 78, 645–653 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-004-0430-1
  11. Stopar, B., Ambrožič, T., Kuhar, M., & Turk, G. (2006). GPS-derived Geoid using Artificial Neural Network and Least Squares Collocation. Survey Review, 38(300), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1179/sre.2006.38.300.513 https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3063757
  12. Tata Herbert and Eleje Sylvester Okiemute (2021). Determination of orthometric heights of points using gravimetric/GPS and geodetic levelling approaches. Indian Journal of Engineering, 18 (49), pp. 134-144. April 2021.
  13. Walker, J. M. (2015) Artificial Neural Networks. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2239-0.