The influence of the sedimentary strata on the seismic oscillation on the teritory Tashlyk hydroelectric pumped storage power plant
Received: March 11, 2018
Revised: June 11, 2018
Accepted: June 27, 2018
Institute of geophysics of NAS of Ukraine
Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Purpose. The aim of the paper is to study the influence of the filtering properties of the sedimentary strata on the seismic vibrations of construction or operational sites located in the territory of Ukraine. Methodology. The effect of the physical and mechanical properties of the sedimentary strata to the seismic effect on the free surface of the Tashlyk HEPSPP territory under possible seismic impacts with various maximum peak accelerations, which with a probability of 99% will not be exceeded for the next 50 years, is analyzed. The assertion was confirmed that the reduction of sediment thickness always improves the seismic conditions of construction. The results are obtained by simulating a soil layer reaction to seismic impacts using the ProShake software. Under simulation, the behavior of each layer of the seismic geological model of the soil strata was specified by the Kelvin-Voigt model (viscoelastic). Each layer of the seismic geological model of the soil thickness was characterized by parameters such as layer thickness, density, primary and shear wave velocities, nonlinear strain-dependent shear modulus, and damping ratio. The use of calculating the strain-dependent shear modulus and damping ratio allow us to take into account the nonlinear reaction of the soil strata to the seismic actions. Scientific novelty. It is shown that a decrease in the thickness of the sedimentary layer under the construction site does not always reduce the manifestations of seismic impacts. The profitability for eliminating the upper loose sediment layer should be assessed in each specific case. Designers need to take into account information about the filtering properties of the soil strata beneath the construction site, choosing the parameters of the designed structures such that they ensure their maximum stability under seismic influences. The change in the parameters of ground conditions under the construction site can significantly affect the seismic effect on its surface. Practical significance. The obtained data on the filtering properties of the soil strata in each of the study areas for which the quantitative characteristics of the seismic hazard are determined allow simultaneously to ensure the stability of the projected facilities and significantly reduce the cost of constructing earthquake resistant buildings that would avoid resonant amplification of seismic oscillations by sedimentary strata for fundamental periods on the designed structures.

  1. Kendzera, A. V., Semenova, Yu. V. (2017). Deformation Characteristics of Computational Model of soil strata. Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: Geology, 78, 17–29 (in Ukrainian).
  2. Kendzera, O. V. (2015). Seismic hazard assessment and protection against earthquakes (Practical applications of developments of Subbotin Institute of Geophysics of NAS of Ukraine), Official Gazette of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2, 44–57. Retrieved from:
  3. Nemchinov, Y., Havkіn, D., Marєnkov, M., Dunіn, V., Babіk, K., Ygupov, K., Kendzera, A., Ygupov, V. (2013). Practical aspects of the dynamics of buildings, Scientific and production magazine Building Ukraine, 6, 6–21 (in Ukrainian).
  4. Pavlov, O. V., Rogozhinа, V. A. (1984). Seismic micro zoning. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).
  5. Starodub, Ju. P., Kendzera, O. V., Siredzhuk, S. P., Kupljovsjkyj, B. Je., Starodub, Gh. R. (2006). Study of fluctuations in engineering objects. Historical Reserve "Sophia of Kyiv"]. Geodynamics, 1(5), 56–61. (in Ukrainian).
  6. Starodub, Yu. P. (1996). Mathematical modeling of dynamic problems of seismology for the study of the earth's crust structure. Direct task. T.1. Lviv: V. Stefanyk Scientific Library of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 172
  7. Bolisetti, C., Whittaker, A., Mason, H., Almufti, I., Willford. M. (2014). Equivalent linear and nonlinear site response analysis for design and risk assessment of safety-related nuclear structures. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 107–121. Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.04.033
  8. Hashash, Y. (2012). DEEPSOI, user Manual and Tutorial. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  9. Kaklamanos, J., Baise, L. G., Thompson, E. M. & Dorfmann. L. (2015). Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 69, 207–219.
  10. Kendzera, O. V., Rushchitsky, J. J., Semenova, Yu. V., (2017). Seismicity on the territory of Ukraine and modern methods on seismic hazard parameters determination for building sites. The 2017 China (Dongguan) International Science and Technology Cooperation Week and 1st China (International), CHINA, 8-10 December, 2017.
  11. Kim, B., & Hashash, Y. M. A. (2013). Site response analysis using downhole array recordings during the March 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake and the effect of long-duration ground motions. Earthquake Spectra, 29, 37–54.
  12. Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. N. J.: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  13. ProShake Ground Response Analysis Program, version 1.1. User’s Manual, EduPro Civil Systems, (1998). Washington, USA.
  14. Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., Seed, H. B. (1972). SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report No. EERC 72-12. Berkeley, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
  15. Starodub, G., Brych, T. (1995). Investigation by the finite element method of stress-strain state of the Transcarpathian crust. Acta Geophysica Polonica, 18, 4, 303–312.
  16. Wang, Y. H., Siu, W. K. (2006). Structure characteristics and mechanical properties of kaolinite soils. II. Effects of structure on mechanical properties. Can. Geotech. J, 43(6), 601–618.