Аbout mechanisms to ensure detainees rights in criminal proceedings: international experience

2017;
: pp. 457-462

V. Kushpit, I. Cilyurik «About mechanisms to ensure detainees rightsin criminal proceedings: international experience»
http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-1-number-865-14...

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

Protection and human rights and freedoms is the main task of every legal state. Of particular importance problem of individual rights gets in the criminal proceedings, which under certain conditions specified by law a person can be applied measures of criminal procedure compulsion. One of these measures that restrict the constitutional rights of the implementation of the criminal proceedings is a procedural criminal detention. Despite its short-term, the volume of the right to freedom and security is high, and therefore become extremely important statutory rights of a detainee, mechanisms and procedures they provide.

 

1. Kushnirenko O. H. Protsedura “khabeas korpus” ta yiyi vtilennya v zakonodavstvi Ukrayiny: materialy mizh nar. nauk. konf. “Stanovlennya suchasnoyi nauky” [The procedure of “habeas corpus” and its implementation legislation Ukraine], Prague, 2007, pp. 46-47.
2. Sablin D. A. Prava cheloveka [Human rights], Orenburg, OGU Publ, 2004, 166 p.
3. Dicey A. V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution [Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution], London, London and New York, Macmillan and co., limited Publ, 1889, 440 p.
4. Zagaris B. The Amparo Process in Mexico [The Amparo Process in Mexico]. Unated States – Mexico Law Journal, 1998, Vol. 6, pp. 61–70.
5. Baquerizo J. Z. Amparo de la Libertad [Amparo de la Libertad]. Revista Jurídica Online. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas. Universidad Católica de Guayaquil, 2008, Vol. 24, pp. 281–292.
6. Pasquel A. Z. Derecho Penal Enemigo y Amparo de Libertad [Derecho Penal Enemigo y Amparo de Libertad]. Revista Jurídica Online. Facultad de Jurisprudencia y Ciencias Sociales y Políticas. Universidad Católica de Guayaquil,2005. Availableat: http://www. revistajuridicaonline. com/images/stories/revistas/2005/ 19/19_Derecho_Penal. pdf.
7. Verkhohlyad-Herasymenko O. V. Zabezpechennya maynovykh prav osoby pry zastosuvanni zakhodiv kryminal’no-protsesual’noho prymusu: monohrafiya [Securing property rights of individuals in applying measures of criminal procedure compulsion], Kharkiv, Yurayt Publ, 2012, 216 p.
8. Trofymenko V. M. Harantiyi zabezpechennya konstytutsiynoho prava na svobodu ta osobystu nedotorkannist’ pry zatrymanni pidozryuvanoho, obvynuvachenoho [Guarantee the constitutional right to liberty and security during the arrest of a suspect, accused]. Universytet·s’ki naukovi zapysky – University research note, 2005, Vol. 3, pp. 281–284.
9. Makovej, M., Razumov, S. A. Evropejskaja konvencija o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod. Stat’ja 5. Pravo na svobodu i lichnuju neprikosnovennost’: Precedenty i komment [Evropejskaja konvencija o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod], Moscow, 2002.