Characteristics of administrative and legal regulation of intellectual property : genesis of development

2023;
: 166-173

Marta Malets “CHARACTERISTICS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY : GENESIS OF DEVELOPMENT” https://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-10-number-137-...

Authors:
1
assistant of the department of administrative and information law Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Psychology Lviv Polytechnic National University

The article is dedicated to a comprehensive study of theoretical and practical issues of administrative and legal regulation of Intellectual Property (IP) as the main element of innovative activity. A particular research has been conducted into the scientific background of administrative and legal regulation of intellectual property. 

The role definition of intellectual property in the innovative development of the state economy and Ukrainian society is highlighted. The mode of formation, i.e. genesis of administrative and legal regulation of intellectual property is outlined as well as expansion of legislation in this particular sphere is analyzed. The administrative and legal aspects of regulating  the activities of intellectual property protection entities are specified. 

The research denotes some growing tendencies of intellectual property law and a number of directions in its further  progress which is expressed in globalization of the law and in transition from protection of material property rights to information protection. 

It is stated in the article that existing intellectual property model or paradigm as well as administrative and legal regulation establishment do not reflect the characteristic, concrete public relations in a modern information society. The priority of the principle of full control of the right holder over the use of the object of intellectual rights leads to the fact that the development of legislation in the field of intellectual property is carried out in the form of strengthening the protection of intellectual rights, i.e. without adapting to the needs of the information society and innovative activity. 

It is emphasized that formation of conceptually unified single legal space for administrative and legal regulation of intellectual property directly determines efficiency of the process of an innovative development itself. Compliance to conceptually unified approach at developing strategy will definitely determine the outcome.

1. Cherevko H. V. (2008). Intelektualʹna vlasnistʹ: navchalʹnyy posibnyk. Znannya. S. 412. [in Ukrainian].

2. Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 28 chervnya 1996 r. № 254k/96-VR. URL. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80/conv#n. [in Ukrainian].

3. Klepko S.F. (1998). Intehratyvna osvita i polimorfizm znannya. Instytut pedahohiky APN Ukrayiny. Kharkivsʹkyy derzhavnyy universytet. S.103. [in Ukrainian].

4. Kodeks Ukrayiny pro administratyvni pravoporushennya (2008). : Naukovo-praktychnyy komentar / R.A. Kalyuzhnyy, A.T. Komzyuk, O.O. Pohribnyy ta inshi. Vseukrayinsʹka asotsiatsiya vydavtsiv “Pravova yednistʹ”. S. 781. [in Ukrainian].

5. Pro okhoronu prav na znaky dlya tovariv ta posluh : Zakonu Ukrayiny No 3689-12 vid 23.12.1993 r. URL : https://doi.org/10.1097/00152193-199312000-00006 https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3689-12#Text [in Ukrainian].

6. Nersesyan A. S. (2008). Kryminalʹno-pravova okhorona prav intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti: avtoref. dys. kand. nauk: 12.00.08; NAN Ukrayiny. In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretsʹkoho. S. 19. [in Ukrainian].

7. Pro vlasnistʹ: Zakonu Ukrayiny vid 07.02.1991 r. Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady URSR (VVR), 1991, № 20, st.249. [in Ukrainian].

8. Tsyvilʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny: naukovo-praktychnyy komentar. URL: httr :// legalekhrert.in.ua/komkodeks/gk. [in Ukrainian].

9. Bernsʹkiy konventsiyi pro okhoronu literaturnykh i khudozhnikh tvoriv: VO intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti: Paryzʹkyy Akt vid 24 lypnya 1971 roku, zminenyy 2 zhovtnya 1979 roku URL: [http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_051]. [in Ukrainian].

10. The Role Of Civic Education. (1995). A Report Of The Task Force On Civic Education. Prepared by the Center for Civic Education. The Second Annual White House Conference On Character Building For A Democratic, Civil Society. Washington, D. C. [in English].

11. Shah A. (1986). The Right to Know. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law. Vol. 13. P. 12–17. [in English].