Abstract. This article is dedicated to the study of issues related to the use of electronic evidence in civil litigation. Within the framework of the article, an analysis of recent scientific publications on the use of electronic evidence is conducted.
The work was performed on the basis of general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge. The general concept and principles of using electronic evidence in civil proceedings, their characteristics, and peculiarities are outlined. A list of advantages regarding the use of electronic evidence is provided. Special attention is given to the description of the procedure for submitting electronic evidence to the court.
The article examines changes and trends in the use of electronic evidence in the modern context of integration and digitization of society, and analyzes progress in the field of information technology.
Problems at the legislative level concerning the submission of both original electronic evidence and their copies to the court are analyzed. Issues related to the procedure and peculiarities of examining electronic evidence, as well as their evaluation by the court, are identified. Specifically, among the problems identified in the article are the insufficient regulatory framework for certifying electronic copies of electronic evidence, the imperfect definition of the concepts of «original electronic evidence» and «copy of electronic evidence» in legislation, the instability of electronic information, the absence of physical form and perception only through special technical devices, the possibility of theft, damage, and tampering, and the determination of their authenticity and admissibility.
Based on the conducted research, the conclusion is drawn that the question of the use of electronic evidence requires urgent resolution, and the legislator should promptly eliminate existing contradictions by making appropriate amendments to the current procedural legislation of our country. Moreover, it is advisable to more precisely define the concept of «electronic evidence» and the specifics of their submission at the legislative level.
1. Fursa S.Ya. Tsiupa T.V. (2017). Dokazy i dokazuvannia u tsyvilnomu protseci. [Evidence and evidence in civil proceedings]. Kyiv: KNT [in Ukrainian].
2. Petrenko V.S. (2018). Elektronni dokazy yak element informatsiinykh tekhnolohii u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi. [Electronic evidence as an element of information technologies in civil proceedings]. Molodyi vchenyi. № 1 (53). P. 111–115. Retrieved from: https://molodyivchenyi.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/5251/5150 (accessed: 21.06.2023) [in Ukrainian].
3. Kodola B. (2017). Elektronni dokazy: rehuliuvannia, yake bude skladno zastocuvaty na praktytsi. [Electronic evidence: peering, which will be complex in practice]. Zakon i Biznes. № 49 (1347). P. 1–4. Retrieved from: https://zib.com.ua/ua/131203.html (accessed: 21.06.2023) [in Ukrainian].
4. Hetmantsev M. (2019). Elektronni dokazy v tsyvilnomu protsesi: praktyka zastosuvannia novel zakonodavstva. [Electronic evidence in the civil process: the practice of applying new legislation]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2019. Vyp. 2. P. 19–23. Retrieved from: http://pgp–journal.kiev.ua/archive/2019/2/5.pdf (accessed: 21.06.2023) [in Ukrainian].
5. Voroniuk O. (2017). Elektronni dokazy: shcho vvazhaty oryhinalom a shcho – kopiieiu? [Electronic evidence: what to consider an original and what a copy?]. Zakon i Biznes. 2017. № 45 (1343). P. 1-3. Retrieved from:: https://zib.com.ua/ua/130967.html (accessed: 21.06.2023) [in Ukrainian].
6. Pro elektronni dokumenty ta elektronnyi dokumentoobih: Zakon Ukrainy (2003, May 22) № 851–IV [On electronic documents and electronic document management: Law of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/851–15#Text (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].
7. Tsyvilnyi protsecualnyi kodeks Ukrainy (2004, March 18). № 1618–IV. [Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618–15#Text (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].
8. Hospodarskyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy (1991, November 6) № 1798– XII. [Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798–12#Text (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].
9. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy (2005, July 6) № 2747–IV. [Administrative Judicial Code of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747–15#Text (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].
10. Vernydubov I., Belikova S. (2018). Elektronni dokazy: poniattia, osoblyvosti ta problemy shchodo yikh doslidzhennia sudom. [Electronic evidence: concepts, features and problems regarding their examination by the court?]. Evropsky politicky a pravni diskurz. 2018. Vol. 5. Iss 2. P. 299–30. [in Ukrainian].
11. Pro elektronni dovirchi posluhy: Zakon Ukrainy (2017, October 5) № 2155–VIII. [On electronic health services: Law of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2155–19#Text (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].
12. Husiev O.Yu. (2019). Problemy vyznachennia oryhinalu elektronnoho dokazu v tsyvilnomu protsesi Ukrainy. [Problems of determining the original of electronic evidence in the civil process of Ukraine.]. Problemy zakonnosti. 2019. Vyp. 147. P. 97–109. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.147.175838
13. Pavlova Yu. C. (2017). Osoblyvosti zbyrannia i protsesualnoho zakriplennia elektronnykh dokaziv v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi. [Peculiarities of seizure and procedural sealing of electronic evidence in civil proceedings]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. 2017. №4. P. 76–80. [in Ukrainian].
14. Drohoziuk K. B. (2016). Suchasni dzherela dokazuvannia v tsyvilnomu protsesi Ukrainy ta Frantsii. [Modern origins of evidence in the civil procedure of Ukraine and France]. Pravo i suspilstvo. 2016. №1. P. 52–63. [in Ukrainian].
15. Kalamaiko A. Yu. (2015). Mistse elektronnykh zasobiv dokazuvannia ta okremi pytannia yikh vykorystannia v tsyvilnomu protsesi. [The purpose of electronic means of evidence and the question of their use in civil proceedings]. Pravo ta innovatsii. 2015. № 2(10). P. 127–132. [in Ukrainian].
16. Postanova Okruzhnoho administratyvnoho sudu m. Kyieva (2016, March 3) № 826/16528/15. [Resolution of the District Administrative Court of Kyiv]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/56551967 (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].
17. Rishennia Sviatoshynskoho raionnoho sudu m. Kyieva (2016, September 6) № 759/19259/15. [Writings of the Svyatoshinsky District Court of Kyiv]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/61275547 (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].
18. Rishennia Novomykolaivskoho raionnoho sudu Zaporizkoi oblasti (2017, March 1) № 322/1141/16. [Writings of the Novy Mykolaiv Court of Appeal of the Zaporizhia Region]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/65201286 (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].
19. Rishennia Vinnytskoho miskoho sudu Vinnytskoi oblacti (2017, May 31) № 127/8337/18. [Writings of the Vinnytsia Municipal Court of the Vinnytsia Region]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/73473893 (accessed: 21.06.2023). [in Ukrainian].