The article is devoted to the study of the representative function of the prosecutor in
administrative proceedings, because today the issue of the representation of rights, freedoms and
legal interests of citizens by the prosecutor in administrative proceedings takes on particular
importance in the context of understanding the mechanisms of human rights protection in the
context of integration processes.
1. Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy. [Great explanatory dictionary ofmodern Ukrainian language] Uklad. i holov. red. V. T. Busel. K.; Irpin: Perun, 2003. 1140 p. 2. Tsyvilnyikodeks Ukrainy [The Civil Code of Ukraine] vid 16 sichnia 2003 roku No. 435-IV. Vidomosti VerkhovnoiRady Ukrainy. 2003. No. 40.P. 356. 3. Pro prokuraturu: Zakon Ukrainy [On the Prosecutor's Office: TheLaw of Ukraine] vid 14 zhovtnia 2014 r. No. 1697-VII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2015. No.2-3. P. 12. 4. Ukhvala Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 19.07.2018 r. No. 822/1169/17. [Decision of theSupreme Court of Ukraine dated July 19, 2018, No. 822/1169/17]. URL:https://verdictum.ligazakon.net/document/75424056. 5. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy uspravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 50 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo ofitsiinohotlumachennia okremykh polozhen chastyny pershoi statti 4 Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy[The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional petition of 50 people'sdeputies of Ukraine regarding the official interpretation of certain provisions of the first part of Article 4 ofthe Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine (case on the protection of law interests)] (sprava pro okhoroniuvanyy̆zakonom interes) No 18-rp/2004 vid 01.12.2004 roku. URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v018p710-04. 6. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinymy podanniamyVyshchoho arbitrazhnoho sudu Ukrainy ta Heneralnoi prokuratury Ukrainy shchodo ofitsiinohotlumachennia polozhen statti 2 Arbitrazhnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [The decision of theConstitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional petitions of the Supreme Arbitration Courtof Ukraine and the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine regarding the official interpretation of theprovisions of Article 2 of the Arbitration Procedural Code of Ukraine ] (sprava pro predstavnytstvoprokuraturoiu Ukrainy interesiv derzhavy v arbitrazhnomu sudi) vid 8 kvitnia 1999 roku No 3-rp/99.Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy. 1999. No. 15. Pt. 614. 7. Kapustin M. V. Poniattia predstavnytstvaprokuraturoiu interesiv liudyny ta derzhavy v sudi. [The notion of representation by the prosecutor'soffice of the interests of the person and the state in court.] Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava, 2012.Vyp. 68. P. 517-524. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/apdp_2012_68_82. 8. Shchavinskyi V. R.Prokuratura Ukrainy yak predstavnyk interesiv derzhavy v administratyvnomu protsesi. [Prosecutor'sOffice of Ukraine as a representative of the interests of the state in the administrative process.]Publichnepravo, 2016. No. 2. P. 83-90. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/pp_2016_2_13. 9. Salnykov V. P. Harantyykonstytutsyonnыkh prav y svobod hrazhdan Rossyy kak mekhanizm ykh sotsyalno-pravovoi zashchytы.Prava cheloveka v Rossyy y pravozashchytnaia deiatelnost hosudarstva. [Guarantees of constitutionalrights and freedoms of citizens of Russia as a mechanism of their social and legal protection. Human rightsin Russia and human rights activities of the state.]Sbornyk materyalov Vserossyiskoi nauchnopraktycheskoikonferentsyy, 12 maia 2003 h. / pod red. d.iu.n. V. N. Lopatyna. SPb.: Yzdatelstvo«Iurydycheskyi tsentr Press», 2003. P. 62-66. 10. Rudenko N. V. Osnovы teoryy predstavytelstvahttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8357.00318prokuraturoy̆ ynteresov v arbytrazhnom sude [Bases of the theory of representation by the Prosecutor'sOffice of interests in the arbitral tribunal]: monohrafyia. Alchevsk: DHMY, Yzdatelsko-polyhrafycheskyy̆tsentr «Lado», 1999. 568 p.