This article is devoted to the analysis of the legal norms of the existing criminal
procedural law in the part of pre-trial investigation and criminal procedural proof, as well as
investigative practice. The need for such an analysis is due to the fact that since the entry into
force of the new Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, the practice of pre-trial investigation
has highlighted a number of problematic issues, the answers to which need to be found
through scientific approaches.
1. Mykheenko M. M. Dokazыvanye v sovetskom uholovnom sudoproyzvodstve [Proving Soviet criminal proceedings]. K.: Vyshcha shkola, 1984. 121 p. 2. Loboiko L. M. Kryminalno-protsesualne pravo [Criminal procedural law]. Navchalnyi posibnyk dlia pidhotovky do derzhavnoho ispytu. Kyiv, «Istyna», 2006. 207 p 3. Pohoretskyi M. A. Aktualni pytannia teorii dokaziv. Dokazy i dokazuvannia za novym kryminalnyi protsesualnym kodeksom Ukrainy [Actual questions of the theory of evidence. Evidence and evidence of a new criminal procedural code of Ukraine]: materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii (m. Kyiv, 6–7 hrudnia 2012). Kyiv, 2012. 376 p. 4. Kryminalnyi protses [Criminal process]. Pidruchnyk. Za red. Tatsiia V. Ia., Hroshovoho Yu. M., Kaplinoi O. V., Shylo O. H. Kharkiv, «Pravo», 2013. 823 p. 5. Yevheniia Zinchenko. Sproba sumistyty v novomu kryminalnomu protsesualnomu zakoni rizni modeli dokazuvannia mozhe pokhytnuty pryntsypy sudochynstva [Attempts to combine in the new criminal procedural law various models of evidence may shake the principles of legal proceedings]. URL:https://zib.com.ua/ua/7436- poednannya_v_novomu_kpk_riznih_modeley_dovedennya_pohitne_pr.html.