Analysis of Methods and Algorithms for Remote Photoplethysmography Signal Diagnostic and Filtering

2024;
: pp. 82 - 88
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University

Remote photoplethysmography is becoming increasingly common in telemedicine for non-invasive physiological monitoring of the cardiovascular system. However, signal reliability has been reduced due to noise and artifacts, which requires reliable diagnostic and filtering methods. The research aim is to evaluate existing methods and algorithms for diagnosing and filtering remote photoplethysmography signals to improve the accuracy of human cardiovascular monitoring. A systematic review has identified methodologies for improving remote photoplethysmography signals by analyzing their principles, implementation, and effectiveness. Various approaches have been analyzed, including the use of statistical computing, adaptive filters, and machine learning algorithms. Each approach offers unique advantages and limitations in terms of noise reduction and artifact removal.

  1. Nakonechnyi A., Berezhnyi I., (2023). Estimation of heart rate and its variability based  on wavelet analysis  of photoplethysmographic signals in real time. Intelligent data ac- quisition and advanced computing systems: technology and applications: proceedings of the 12th IEEE International conference IDAACS, Dortmund, Germany, 7–9 September 2023. Vol. 1, pp. 765–770, ISBN: 979-835035805-6, DOI:10.1109/IDAACS58523.2023.10348785
  2. Yonggang Tong, Zhipei Huang, Zhen Zhang, Ming Yin, Guangcun Shan, Jiankang Wu, Fei Qin, (2023). Detail- preserving arterial pulse wave measurement based Bior- thogonal wavelet decomposition from remote RGB observa- tions. Measurement 2023, Volume 222, pp. 123–128, ISSN 0263-2241, DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113605.
  3. Birla Lokendra, Gupta Puneet, (2022). AND-rPPG: A novel denoising-rPPG network for improving remote heart rate es- timation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, Volume 141, 2022,       pp. 169–181,       ISSN       0010-4825, DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105146.
  4. Thayer J.F., Yamamoto S.S., Brosschot J.F., (2010). The relationship of autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability, and cardiovascular disease risk factors”. Int J Cardiol. 2010, pp. 122–141, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.09.543.
  5. Wang W., den Brinker A.C., Stuijk S., de Haan G., (2016). Algorithmic principles of remote ppg. IEEE Trans. Biomed Eng. 2016, pp. 1479–1491. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2609282.
  6. Farzana Anowar, Samira Sadaoui, Bassant Selim, (2021). Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality re- duction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE). Computer Science Review, Volume   40,   2021,   pp. 41–49  ISSN  1574-0137,   DOI:doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100378.
  7. Michael Schmid, David Rath, Ulrike Diebold, (2020). Why and How Savitzky–Golay Filters Should Be Replaced. ACS Meas.     Sci. Au, pp. 185–196 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20339.50725.
  8. Lagun, Ilona, (2019). The Methods of Choosing the Wave- lets for One Dimensional Signal Processing. Advances in Cyber-physical Systems 2019; Volume 4, Number 2, pp. 84–90, DOI: 10.23939/acps2019.02.084.
  9. Hanguang Xiao, Tianqi Liu, Yisha Sun, Yulin Li, Shiyi Zhao, Alberto Avolio, (2024). Remote photoplethysmogra- phy for heart rate measurement. Biomedical Signal Process- ing and Control, Volume 88, Part B, 2024, pp. 254–263, ISSN 1746-8094, DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105608.
  10. Mohammad Sabokrou, Masoud Pourreza, Xiaobai Li, Mah- mood Fathy, Guoying Zhao, (2021). Deep-HR: Fast heart rate estimation from face video under realistic conditions. Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 186, pp. 73–83, ISSN 0957-4174, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115596