ANALYSIS OF REQUIREMENTS FOR EQUIPMENT AND TECHNIQUES ACCORDING TO ISO/IEC 17025:2017

2019;
: pp. 67-74
1
Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy
2
Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy
3
Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy

It is important to carry out metrological confirmation of the used measuring equipment in order to obtain reliable measurement results during the conformity assessment of products. Assessment of the metrological confirmation of the measuring equipment confirms its conformity with the given measuring task. For proper performance of this task it is necessary to have an appropriate measurement  technique. When performing measurements  in  accordance with  a  specified method,  it  is  important  to clearly  comply  with  the  requirements  contained  in  the  measuring  equipment,  the  conditions  of  conducting,  the  sequence  of measurement operations, and the requirements for specialists. The fulfillment of these requirements makes it possible to obtain a reliable  result  with  the  necessary  accuracy.  The  implementation  of  ISO/IEC  17025:2017  is  an  important  step  in  setting requirements for measurements. This edition of the standard proposes to standardize and evaluate the accuracy of the measurement result not only in uncertainty of measurements, but also in other indicators of accuracy. The analysis of international requirements for equipment, including measurement, techniques of test and measurement, and standardization of requirements of the discussed standard have been carried out. An important factor in the implementation of the standard in Ukraine is the absence of the national standards which  could  regulate  the  general  requirements  for measuring  equipment  application  and  assess  the  obtained  results accuracy.  In  the  standard under  consideration,  the general approaches  to  the use of  equipment  and  to  accuracy  of  the  received results obtained by appropriate techniques are provided.

[1]  ISO/IEC 17025:2017. General  requirements  for  the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. 

[2] NAAU Management System “General requirements for  the  competence  of  testing  and  calibration  laboratories  (in accordance with  ISO/IEC 17025:2017)”.  [On-line]. Available:

[3]  ISO/IEC 17025:2005. General  requirements  for  the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. 

[4]  ISO/IEC  17000:2004.  Conformity  assessment  – Vocabulary and general principles.

[5]  ISO  10012:2003. Measurement  management systems  –  Requirements  for  measurement  processes  and measuring equipment. 

[6]  ISO/IEC Guide  99:2007.  International Vocabulary of Metrology  –  Basic  and  General  Concepts  and  Associated Terms (VIM). 

[7]  OIML  R  34.  Recommendation.  Edition  1979  (E). Accuracy classes of measuring instruments. 

[8] EA-4/02 M: 2013. Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement іn Calibration.

[9]  ILAC-G  24/OIML  D  10:2010.  Guidelines  for  the determination  of  calibration  intervals  of  measuring instruments.

[10]  ISO  5725-1:1998.  Accuracy  (trueness  and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions.

[11]  ISO  5725-2:1998.   Accuracy  (trueness  and precision)  of measurement methods  and  results.  Part 2: Basic method  for  the  determination  of  repeatability  and reproducibility of a standard measurement method.

[12]  ISO  5725-3:1998.  Accuracy  (trueness  and precision)  of  measurement  methods  and  results.  Part 3: Intermediate  measures  of  the  precision  of  a  standard measurement method.

[13]  ISO  5725-4:1998.  Accuracy  (trueness  and precision)  of measurement methods  and  results.  Part 4: Basic methods  for  the  determination  of  the  trueness  of  a  standard measurement method.

[14]  ISO  5725-5:1998.  Part Accuracy  (trueness  and precision) of measurement methods and results. 5: Alternative methods  for  the  determination  of  the  precision  of  a  standard measurement method.

[15]  ISO  5725-6:1998.  Accuracy  (trueness  and precision) of measurement methods and results.  Part 6: Use in practice of accuracy values.

[16]  JCGM  100:2008.  Evaluation  of  measurement  data – Guide  to  the expression of uncertainty  in measurement (GUM). 

[17]  JCGM  101:2008.  Evaluation  of  measurement  data  –  Supplement  1  to  the  “Guide  to  the  expression  of uncertainty  in  measurement”  –  Propagation  of  distributions using a Monte Carlo method. 

[18]  JCGM  102.  Evaluation  of  measurement  data  – Supplement 2 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” – Models with any number of output quantities.

[19]  JCGM  103.  Evaluation  of  measurement  data  – Supplement 3 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” – Modeling.

[20] JCGM 104. Evaluation of measurement data – An introduction  to  the  “Guide  to  the  expression of uncertainty  in measurement” and related documents [this document].

[21]  JCGM  105.  Evaluation  of  measurement  data  – Concepts and basic principles.

[22] JCGM 106. Evaluation of measurement data – The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment.

[23]  JCGM  107.  Evaluation  of  measurement  data  – Applications of the least-squares method.

[24]  V.Motalo,  A.Chereshnevska,  “Analysis  of indicators of quality of measurements”, Measuring Equipment and Metrology, vol. 79, No. 2, p. 35–41, 2018.