RESPONSE TIME IN INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNIT CONTROL ALGORITHMS

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
Lviv National Agrarian University

The Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) [1] is a cornerstone technology in various fields, ranging from aerospace to consumer electronics, where accurate motion tracking is paramount. Central to the effectiveness of an IMU is the quality of data processing, particularly in the context of filtering techniques. This study compares two filtering methods: Complementary Filters and Kalman Filters, in their application to IMU data processing. Complementary Filters, known for their simplicity and efficiency, contrast with the more complex but potentially more accurate Kalman Filters. Our investigation delves into the underpinnings of each filter, followed by a practical analysis of their performance in real-world IMU applications. We comprehensively compare these filters in terms of accuracy, computational efficiency, and ease of implementation. This research offers valuable insights for practitioners and researchers in selecting the most suitable filtering approach for specific IMU-based applications, enhancing the overall quality of motion sensing and analysis.

  1. A. Norhafizan, G. Raja, N. Khairi, Reviews on Various Inertial Measurement Unit, International Journal of Signal Processing Systems Vol. 1, No. 2 December 2013, pp.256-261. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/89189534/
  2. Azis, F.A 1 , Aras, M. S. M 1 , Rashid, M.Z.A 1 , Othman M.N 2 , Abdullah,S.S., Problem Identification for Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV): A Case Study, Procedia Engineering 41 ( 2012 ) 554 – 560, 1877-7058 Int. Symp. on Robotics and Intel. Sensors, 2012 (IRIS 2012) doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.211, https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/278653/1-s2.0- S1877705812X00213/1-s2.0-S1877705812026112/main.pdf?X-Amz-Security-
  3. R. Meinhold, N. Singpurwalla, Understanding the Kalman filter, American Statistician, May 1983, Vol.37, No.2, pp.123-127, http://www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~steele/Resources/FTSResources/ StateSpaceModels/KFExposition/MeinSing83.pdf
  4. P. Gui, L. Tang and S. Mukhopadhyay, "MEMS based IMU for tilting measurement: Comparison of complementary and kalman filter based data fusion," 2015 IEEE 10th Conf. on Industr. Electronics and Appl. (ICIEA), Auckland, New Zealand, 2015, pp. 2004-2009, doi: 10.1109/ICIEA.2015.7334442
  5. Á. Revuelta. Orientation estimation and movement, Master’s Thesis in Electrical Engineering with emphasis in Signal Processing, 2017, Department of Applied Signal Processing, Blekinge Institute of Technology, SE–371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden.   https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1127455/FULLTEXT02.pdf
  6. J. Wu, Z. Zhou, J. Chen, R. Li, Fast Complementary Filter for Attitude Estimation Using Low-Cost MARG Sensors, , IEEE  Sensors  Journal  16(18):1-0,1  Sept.  2016, DOI:10.1109/JSEN.2016.2589660
  7. [7]. L. Kleeman, Understanding and Applying Kalman Filtering, Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering Monash University, Clayton, https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~motionplanning/papers /sbp_papers/kalman/kleeman_understanding_kalman.pdf