1. JCPEE
  2. All Volumes and Issues
  3. Volume 9, Number 1, 2019
  4. Mitigation of magnetic field from overhead power lines with triangular conductor arrangements using active shielding systems

Mitigation of magnetic field from overhead power lines with triangular conductor arrangements using active shielding systems

JCPEE.
2019;
Volume 9, Number 1
: pp. 5-13
https://doi.org/10.23939/jcpee2019.01.005
Authors:
  1. Borys Kuznetsov
  2. Ihor Bovdui
  3. Tatyana Nikitina
  4. Valeriy Kolomiets
  5. Borys Kobylianskyi
1
State Institution «Institute of Technical Problems of Magnetism of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine»
2
State Institution «Institute of Technical Problems of Magnetism of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine»
3
Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University
4
Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy
5
Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy

The paper presents results of synthesis, theoretical, and experimental studies of a robust system of active shielding of the magnetic field generated by overhead power lines with triangular conductor arrangements. The synthesis is based on the solution of a multi-criteria stochastic game, in which the vector payoff is calculated on the basis of the Maxwell equations solutions in a quasi-stationary approximation. The solution to the game is based on the algorithms of stochastic multiagent particle multiswarm optimization.  The possibility of a significant mitigation of magnetic flux density and a reduction in the sensitivity of the system to the plant parameters uncertainty is shown. Three shielding coils are required to shield a magnetic field in a five-story building, and two shielding coils are sufficient to shield the same magnetic field in a single-story building. Practical recommendations are given on the reasonable choice of the spatial arrangements of the shielding coils of a robust system of active shielding of the magnetic field generated by an overhead power line with a triangular arrangement of conductors. The experimental research into the robust system of active shielding model of the magnetic field generated by overhead power lines with a triangular arrangement of conductors and two shielding coils is carried out. The comparison of experimental and calculated results of the magnetic flux density values in the shielding space shows that their spread does not exceed 30 %.

overhead power lines
power-frequency magnetic field
robust system of active shielding
  1. “Active Magnetic Shielding (Field Cancellation)”, http://www.emfservices.com/afcs.html, April 09 2019.
  2. S. Celozzi and F. Garzia, “Active shielding for power-frequency magnetic field reduction using genetic algorithms optimization”, IEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 2–7, Rome, Italy, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-smt:20040002
  3. A. Shenkman, N. Sonkin, and V. Kamensky, “Active protection from electromagnetic field hazards of a high voltage power line”, HAIT Journal of Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 254–265, 2005.
  4. H. Beltran, V. Fuster, and M. García, “Magnetic field reduction screening system for a magnetic field source used in industrial applications”, in Proc. 9 Congreso Hispano Luso de Ingeniería Eléctrica (9CHLIE), рp. 84–99, Marbella, Spain, 2005.
  5. V.Yu. Rozov, V.S. Grinchenko, D.Ye. Pelevin, and K.V. Chunikhin, “Simulation of electromagnetic field in residential buildings located near overhead lines”, Tekhnichna Elektrodynamika, no. 3, pp. 6-9, Kyiv, Ukraine: Institute of Electrodynamics of Ukraine, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15407/techned2016.03.006
  6. J. Bravo-Rodriguez, J. del-Pino-Lуpez, and P. Cruz-Romero, “A Survey on Optimization Techniques Applied to Magnetic Field Mitigation in Power Systems”, Energies, vol. 12(7), pp. 1-12, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12071332
  7. S.Celozzi, “Active compensation and partial shields for the power-frequency magnetic field reduction”, in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. On Electromagnetic Compatibility, pp. 222–226, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2002.
  8. V.Yu. Rozov, S.Yu. Reutskyi, D.Ye. Pelevin, and O.Yu Pyliugina, “The magnetic field of transmission lines and the methods of its mitigation to a safe level”, Tekhnichna Elektrodynamika, no. 2, pp. 3–9, Kyiv, Ukraine: Institute of Electrodynamics of Ukraine, 2013
  9. H.J.M. Brake, R. Huonker, and H. Rogalla, “New results in active noise compensation for magnetically shielded rooms”, Meas. Sci. Technol., no. 4, pp. 1370–1375, 1993. 
     https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/4/12/010
  10. A. Schnabel, J. Voigt, M. Burghoff, and S. Knappe-Gruneberg, “Magnetic Shielding State of art, new magnetic shielding and active magnetic shielding for low noise applications”, vol.51, no.5, pp.137–142, Rome, Italy, 2003.
  11. “The World Health Organization, “The International EMF Project””, http://www.who.int/peh-emf/project/en/, Feb 17, 2017.
  12. Electrical installation regulations, 5th ed., The Ministry of Energy and Coal Mining of Ukraine, 2014.
  13. P. Cruz Romero, C. Mitchell Izquierdo, and M. Payan Burgos, “Optimal split-phase configurations”, in Proc. 2001 IEEE Porto Power Tech Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX502), Volume 3, p. 5, Porto, Portugal, 10–13 September 2001.
  14. P. Cruz Romero, C. Izquierdo, M. Burgos, L.F. Ferrer, F. Soto, C. LLanos, and J.D. Pacheco, “Magnetic field mitigation in power lines with passive and active loops”, in Proc. CIGR Session, Paris, France, 25–30 August 2002.
  15. S. Barsali, R. Giglioli, and D. Poli, “Active shielding of overhead line magnetic field: Design and applications”, Electr. Power Syst. Res, 110, pp. 55–63, 2014. 
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2014.01.005
  16. J.C. del-Pino-Lуpez and P. Cruz-Romero, “Influence of different types of magnetic shields on the thermal behavior and ampacity of underground power cables”, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 26, pp. 2659–2667, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2158593
  17. J.C. del-Pino-Lуpez, P. Cruz-Romero, and L. Serrano-Iribarnegaray, “Impact of electromagnetic losses in closed two-component magnetic shields on the ampacity of underground power cables”, Prog. Electromagn. Res., 135, pp. 601–625, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIER12112303
  18. J.C. del-Pino-Lуpez, L. Giaccone, A. Canova, P. Cruz-Romero, “Design of active loops for magnetic field mitigation in MV/LV substation surroundings”, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 119, pp. 337–344, 2015.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2014.10.019
  19. J.C. del-Pino-Lуpez, L. Giaccone, A. Canova, and P. Cruz-Romero, “Ga-based active loop optimization for magnetic field mitigation of MV/LV substations”, IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., 12, pp. 1055–1061, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2014.6894000
  20. A. Canova and L. Giaccone, “Real-time optimization of active loops for the magnetic field minimization”, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech., 56, pp. 97–106, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-172286
  21. A. Canova, J.C. del Pino Lуpez, L. Giaccone, and M. Manca, “Active shielding system for elf magnetic fields”, IEEE Transaction on Magnetics, no. 3, pp. 51, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2354515
  22. N. Femia, G. Petrone, G. Spagnuolo, and M. Vitelli, “Optimization of Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Method”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, no. 20(4), pp. 963–973, Jul, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2005.850975
  23. B. Kuznetsov, A. Turenko, T. Nikitina, A. Voloshko, and V. Kolomiets, “Method of synthesis of closed-loop systems of active shielding magnetic field of power transmission lines”, Tekhnichna Elektrodynamika, no. 4, pp. 8-10, Kyiv, Ukraine: Institute of Electrodynamics of Ukraine, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15407/techned2016.04.008
  24. B.I. Kuznetsov, T.B. Nikitina, A.V. Voloshko, I.V. Bovdyj, E.V. Vinichenko, and B.B. Kobilyanskiy, “Synthesis of an active shielding system of the magnetic field of power lines based on multiobjective optimization”, Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, vol. 6, pp. 26-30, 2016.
     https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2016.6.05
  25. Z. Ren, M.-T. Pham, and C.S. Koh, “Robust Global Optimization of Electromagnetic Devices With Uncertain Design Parameters: Comparison of the Worst Case Optimization Methods and Multiobjective Optimization Approach Using Gradient Index”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, no. 49, pp. 851-859, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2212713
  26. A. Rankovic, “Novel multi-objective optimization method of electric and magnetic field emissions from double-circuit overhead power line”, Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 27, issue 2, p. e2243, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etep.2243
  27. M. Ummels, Stochastic Multiplayer Games Theory and Algorithms. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789085550402
  28. V.Yu. Rozov, S.Yu. Reutskyi, and O.Yu. Pyliugina, “The method of calculation of the magnetic field of three-phase power lines”, Tekhnichna Elektrodynamika, no. 5, pp. 11-13, Kyiv, Ukraine: Institute of Electrodynamics of Ukraine, 2014.
  29. V.V. Panchenko, A.S. Maslii, D.P. Pomazan, and S.G. Buriakovskyi, “Determination of factors of pulsations of the system of suppression of interfering harmonics of a semiconductor converter”, Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, vol. 3, pp. 35-40, 2018.
  30. S. Buriakovskyi, An. Masliy, and Ar. Masliy, “Determining parameters of electric drive of a sleeper-type turnout based on electromagnet and linear inductor electric motor”, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, vol. 82, no. 4/1, pp. 32-41, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.75860
  31. M. Zagirnyak, O. Chornyi, V. Nykyforov, O. Sakun, and K. Panchenko, “Experimental research of electromechanical and biological systems compatibility”, Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 128-131, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15199/48.2016.01.31
  32. S.G. Buriakovskyi, A.S. Maslii, V.V. Panchenko, D.P. Pomazan, and I.V. Denis, “The research of the operation modes of the locomotive CHME3 on the imitation model”, Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, vol. 3, pp. 59-62, 2018. https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2018.2.10
  33. V. Rozov and V. Grinchenko,,“Simulation and analysis of power frequency electromagnetic field in buildings closed to overhead lines”, in Proc. IEEE First Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (UKRCON-2017), pp. 500-503, Kyiv, Ukraine, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/UKRCON.2017.8100538
  34. M. Zagirnyak, S. Serhiienko, and O. Chornyi. “Innovative technologies in laboratory workshop for students of technical specialties”, in Proc. 2017 IEEE 1st Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (UKRCON-2017), pp. 1216-1220, Kyiv, Ukraine, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/UKRCON.2017.8100446
  35. P. Chystiakov, O. Chornyi, B. Zhautikov, G. Sivyakova. “Remote control of electromechanical systems based on computer simulators”, in Proc. 2017 IEEE International Conference on modern electrical and energy systems (MEES-2017), pp. 364-367, Kremenchuk, Ukraine: M. Ostrohradskyi National University, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEES.2017.8248934
  36. N. Ostroverkhov, S. Korol, S. Buryan, and M. Pushkar. “Investigation the Maximal Values of Flux and Stator Current of Autonomous Induction Generator”, in Proc. IEEE Internat. Conference First Ukraine Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (UKRCON-2017), pp. 560-563, Kyiv, Ukraine, 2017.
  37. V.Ya. Galchenko and A.N. Yakimov, “A turmitobionic method for the solution of magnetic defectometry problems in structural-parametric optimization formulation”, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, vol. 50, Issue 2, pp. 59–71, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091402003X
  38. M. Clerc, Particle Swarm Optimization. London, UK: ISTE Ltd, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470612163
  39. Y. Shoham and K. Leyton-Brown, Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811654
  40. X. Hu, R.C. Eberhart, and Y. Shi, “Particle Swarm with Extended Memory for Multiobejctive Optimization”, in Proc. IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, pp. 193–197, 2003.
  41. Z. Michalewicz and M. Schoenauer, “Evolutionary Algorithms for Constrained Parameter Optimization Problems”, Evolutionary Computation, no.4 (1), pp. 1–32, 1996. 
    https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.1996.4.1.1
  42. K. Parsopoulos and M. Vrahatis, “Particle Swarm Optimization Method for Constrained Optimization Problems”, in Proc. Euro-International Symposium on Computational Intelligence. pp. 174–181, 2002.
  43. G.T. Pulido and C.A. Coello Coello, “A Constraint-Handling Mechanism for Particle Swarm Optimization”, in Proc. Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 137–143, 2004.
  44. T. Ray and K.M. Liew, “A swarm metaphor for multiobjective design optimization”, Engineering Optimization, pp. 141–153, vol. 34, no. 2, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150210915
  45. M. Reyes-Sierra and C.A. Coello Coello, “Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimizers A Survey of the State-of-the-Art”, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 287–308, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5019/j.ijcir.2006.68
  46. A.I.F. Vaz and E.M.G.P. Fernandes, “Optimization of Nonlinear Constrained Particle Swarm”, Technological and economic development of economy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 30–36, Vilnius, Lithuania: Technika, 2006.https://doi.org/10.3846/13928619.2006.9637719
  47. Eckart Zilzter, “Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimizations: methods and applications”, Ph. D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland, 1999.
  48. V. Gal’chenko, A.Yakimov, and D.Ostapushchenko, “Pareto-optimal parametric synthesis of axisymmetric magnetic systems with allowance for nonlinear properties of the ferromagnet”, Technical Physics, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 893–899, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784212070110
  49. B. Kuznetsov, T. Nikitina, M. Tatarchenko, and V. Khomenko, “Multicriterion anisotropic regulators synthesis by multimass electromechanical systems”, Tekhnichna elektrodynamika, no.4, pp. 105-107, 2014. (Russian)
  50. X, Yang, Zh. Cui, R. Xiao, A. Gandomi, and M. Karamanoglu, Swarm Intelligence and Bio-Inspired Computation: Theory and Applications, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2013.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405163-8.00001-6
  51. B. Kuznetsov, T. Nikitina, A. Voloshko, I. Bovdyj, E. Vinichenko, and B. Kobilyanskiy, “Experimental research of magnetic field sensors spatial arrangement influence on efficiency of closed loop of active screening system of magnetic field of power line”, Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, vol. 1, pp.16-20, Kharkiv, Ukraine: National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, 2017.
     https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2017.1.03