Determination of the recent rotation poles of the main tectonic plates on the base of GNSS data

https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2022.02.017
Received: September 03, 2022
Authors:
1
Lviv polytechnic National University

The main goal is to determine and analyze the recent rotation poles of the main tectonic plates based on measurements of continuous GNSS stations for the period of 2002–2021. Using procedures based on the method of the least squares, we suggested an algorithm to determine recent rotation poles of tectonic plates on the basis of processing time series of daily solutions of continuous GNSS stations. The algorythm was implemented in the MathCAD software package. It uses, generalizes, and modernizes the approaches presented in previous studies. Structurally, this algorithm consists of five consecutive stages: transformation of data into an internal format; compliance check and time series filtering; determination of horizontal displacement rates; compliance check and filtering of specified velocities; determination of rotation poles. The algorithm involves the use of freely available time series of daily solutions of continuous GNSS stations, or any other data prepared in a similar format. The study has developed an algorithm to determine recent rotation poles of tectonic plates. It is based on processing time series of daily solutions of continuous GNSS stations. The algorithm was tested to define the recent rotation poles of the main tectonic plates. We determined the components of recent horizontal displacement vectors of 3169 continuous GNSS stations located on 7 large, 7 medium and 3 micro plates for the period of 2002-2021 in the ITRF2014/IGS14 reference frame. The accuracy of determining the component vectors of horizontal displacements is in the range of 0.9-6.4 mm and is on average 10–15% of the vector length. The research allowed us to construct a map scheme of the spatial distribution of the velocity field of recent horizontal movements of continuous GNSS stations. Recent rotation poles of the main tectonic plates were determined for the period 2002-2021 in ITRF2014/IGS14 reference frame. It was established that, in general, the obtained values of recent rotation poles correlate well with known models of tectonic plate movements. This confirms the correctness of the chosen method, as well as the reliability of the obtained results. Recent rotation poles of tectonic plates are the basis for modeling and analysis of global, regional and local geodynamic processes, so their accurate determination is an urgent and necessary task. GNSS data is an alternative, and recently, practically irreplaceable basis for determining such parameters. The rapid increase in the number of continuous GNSS stations, as well as the high quality of their measurements, contributes to improving the accuracy of determining the recent rotation poles of tectonic plates, but leads to the need for their constant recalculation and refinement. The presented algorithm and the obtained results can be used to develop new and refine existing models of tectonic plate movements and reference frames, as well as to forecast the movements of the Earth’s crust.

  1. Altamimi, Z., Sillard, P., & Boucher, C. (2002). ITRF2000: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B10), ETG 2–1–ETG 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jb000561
  2. Altamimi, Z., Collilieux, X., Legrand, J., Garayt, B., & Boucher, C. (2007). ITRF2005: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame based on time series of station positions and Earth Orientation Parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(B9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jb004949
  3. Altamimi, Z., Métivier, L., & Collilieux, X. (2012). ITRF2008 plate motion model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117(B7), n/a–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jb008930
  4. Altamimi, Z., Métivier, L., Rebischung, P., Rouby, H., & Collilieux, X. (2017). ITRF2014 plate motion model. Geophysical Journal International, 209(3), 1906–1912. doi:10.1093/gji/ggx136
  5. Altamimi, Z., Rebischung, P., Métivier, L., & Collilieux, X. (2016). ITRF2014: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(8), 6109–6131. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb013098
  6. Argus, D. F., & Gordon, R. G. (1991). No-net-rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model NUVEL-1. Geophysical Research Letters, 18(11), 2039–2042. https://doi.org/10.1029/91gl01532
  7. Argus, D. F., & Heflin, M. B. (1995). Plate motion and crustal deformation estimated with geodetic data from the Global Positioning System. Geophysical Research Letters, 22(15), 1973–1976. https://doi.org/10.1029/95gl02006
  8. Argus, D. F., Gordon, R. G., & DeMets, C. (2011). Geologically current motion of 56 plates relative to the no-net-rotation reference frame. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12(11), n/a–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gc003751
  9. Bird, P. (2003). An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gc000252
  10. Blewitt, G., W. C. Hammond, & C. Kreemer (2018), Harnessing the GPS data explosion for interdisciplinary science, Eos, 99, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EO104623.
  11. Chase, C. G. (1972). The N Plate Problem of Plate Tectonics. Geophysical Journal International, 29(2), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.1972.tb02202.x
  12. Cox, A., & Hart, R. B. (1986). Plate Tectonics: How It Works: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Inc. Boston. p.63-84.
  13. DeMets, C., Gordon, R. G., Argus, D. F., & Stein, S. (1990). Current plate motions. Geophysical Journal International, 101(2), 425–478. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1990.tb06579.x
  14. Drewes, H. (2009). The Actual Plate Kinematic and Crustal Deformation Model APKIM2005 as Basis for a Non-Rotating ITRF. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00860-3_15
  15. Euler's theorem and its proof are contained in paragraphs 24–26 of the appendix (Additamentum. pp. 201–203) of L. Eulero (Leonhard Euler), Formulae generales pro translatione quacunque corporum rigidorum (General formulas for the translation of arbitrary rigid bodies), presented to the St. Petersburg Academy on October 9, 1775, and first published in Novi Commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae 20, 1776, pp. 189–207 (E478) and was reprinted in Theoria motus corporum rigidorum, ed. nova, 1790, pp. 449–460 (E478a) and later in his collected works Opera Omnia, Series 2, Volume 9, pp. 84-98.
  16. Figurski, M., & Nykiel, G. (2017). Investigation of the impact of ITRF2014/IGS14 on the positions of the reference stations in Europe. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 14, No. 4 (188), 401-410. https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2017.0021
  17. Goudarzi, M. A., Cocard, M., & Santerre, R. (2015). Estimating Euler pole parameters for eastern Canada using GPS velocities. Geodesy and Cartography, 41(4), 162–173. doi:10.3846/20296991.2015.1123445
  18. Khain, V.E. & Poletaev, A.I. (2007). Rotary Tectonics of the Earth. Nauka v Rossii, no. 6, pp. 14–21. (in Russian)
  19. Kreemer, C., Lavallée, D. A., Blewitt, G., & Holt, W. E. (2006). On the stability of a geodetic no-net-rotation frame and its implication for the International Terrestrial Reference Frame. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(17). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl027058
  20. Le Pichon, X. (1968). Sea‐floor spreading and continental drift. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73(12), 3661-3697. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i012p03661
  21. Lobkovsky, L. I. (1988). Geodynamics of Spreading and Subduction Zones, and the Two-Level Plate Tectonics, 251 pp. (in Russian)
  22. Marchenko, O, Tretyak, K, Kylchitskiy, A., Golubinka, Yu., Marchenko, D, & Tretyak, N. (2012). Investigation of the gravitational field, ocean topography and crustal movements in the Antarctic region. Lviv, Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House, 306. (In Ukrainian)
  23. Minster, J. B., & Jordan, T. H. (1978). Present-day plate motions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 83(B11), 5331. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb083ib11p05331
  24. Nevada Geodetic Laboratory. Nevada Geodetic Laboratory - Home. (n.d.). Retrieved March 22, 2022, from http://geodesy.unr.edu/
  25. Savchyn, I. (2022). Establishing the correlation between changes of absolute rotation poles of major tectonic plates based on continuous GNSS stations data. Acta Geodyn. Geomater, 19, No. 2 (206), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2022.0006
  26. Sella, G. F., Dixon, T. H., & Mao, A. (2002). REVEL: A model for Recent plate velocities from space geodesy. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B4), ETG 11–1–ETG 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb000033
  27. Tretyak, K., Al-Alusi, F. K. F., & Babiy, L. (2018). Investigation of the interrelationship between changes and redistribution of angular momentum of the earth, the Antarctic tectonic plate, the atmosphere, and the ocean. Geodynamics, 1 (24), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.23939/jgd2018.01.005