Legal identity: structuring the meaningful space
The article substantiates the proposition about the expediency of considering legal identity as a special form of social identity and reveals its essence as a legal category.
The article substantiates the proposition about the expediency of considering legal identity as a special form of social identity and reveals its essence as a legal category.
Clarifying the socio-psychological aspect of a person always involves study of the patterns of formation of a certain internal structure person and its performance as a regulator of behavior. The formation of this structure of the person occurs gradually from the moment of its birth under the influence of various factors.
To be the subject of any social relationship, man must reach a certain level of psychophysical and social development, which will enable her to be aware of and control her behavior, and therefore be responsible for it.
The article indicates that the honor and dignity of a person is an important factor and an integral component of his constitutional rights and freedoms. Starting from antiquity, in many normative legal acts such as Roman law, Digests of Justinian, the legislation of Kievan Rus, and other European states, the desire to protect the rights, honor and dignity of privileged social classes, and later also of free people, through the legislative policy of the state, can be traced.
У статті на основі значної джерельної бази комплексно проаналізовано визначення
термінів «поведінка» та «діяльність», простежено розвиток дефініцій у правознавчому
аспекті, з’ясовано їхні основні ознаки та характеристики. Здійснено спробу доведення,
що поняття «поведінка» та «діяльність» становлять основу філософеми девіантної
поведінки.
The article deals with the modern approaches to the formation of the institution of responsibility of the state to a person. The author made an attempt to analyze the relationship “person – state” in the field of implementation of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. It is proved that one of the reason of the irresponsibility of the state in this context is the absence of effective mechanisms of realization of such responsibility.