Diminutives as Markers in Ukrainian Identity

2024;
: pp. 283 - 289
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Educatinoal and Rasearch Institute of Law, Psychology and Innovative Education
2
Львівський державний університет внутрішніх справ директор Інституту менеджменту, психології та безпеки

Abstract. The study of identity, in general, causes an assessment of appropriateness in various cultural spheres. For many scientists, the related problems of recognizing its markers have gained due significance. However, Ukrainian identity itself has not always been objectively disclosed. This is related to the manipulative practices and technologies of Russian pseudoscience. The article discusses a sign that expresses the peculiarities of lexical usage in the national language. Specifically, it focuses on words—markers—that carry diminutive meanings, the semantics of which are connected to the expression of communication.The emotional and expressive nuances of speech convey the individual characteristics of a person's speech development, often reflecting the tragic events in their life or their joyful life experiences. Various genres of media narratives and artistic works (including political views and motives, journalistic pieces, epic works of spoken word artists, songs, and their analogues) are taken into account.Attention is drawn to the methodological role of diminutives in the philosophical understanding of the axiological values and spirituality of the bearers of such markers, as well as their anthropological nature and spontaneous thought processes in the mental dimension of Ukrainians. The textual samples used for analysis are well-known works from classical Ukrainian culture (T. Shevchenko, P. Chubynskyi, G. Kvitka-Osnov’yanenko, I. Kotlyarevskyi, etc.). The use of diminutives by individuals who express sympathy for the fate of Ukraine, their relatives, and loved ones confirms the particular significance of national identity. This identity is embodied in binary forms—good and evil—that are inherent in the spiritual essence and inner world of the Ukrainian people.

  1. Azarova, L. (2018). Language as a key identity factor of Ukraine’s nation. Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine, 292. Retrieved from:  http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Filol/article/view/11795v [In Ukrainian].
  2. Bacevich, F. (2005). Linguistic geneology: Problems and prospects: Monograph. (PAIS). [In Ukrainian].
  3. Burgess, J. P. (1998). Marcus,  Kripke, and Names. В P. W. Humphreys J. H. Fetzer (Ред.), The New Theory of Reference (с. 89–124). Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5250-1_5 [In Ehglish]
  4. Donskis, L. (2010). Preserved identity and the modern world. Kyiv: Fakt [In Ukrainian].
  5. Garbacz, P. (2002). Relatywna identyczność i nieodróżnialność. Filozofia Nauky, 3(4), P. 53–64. [In Poland]
  6. Hryshchuk, V., Hryshchuk, O., & Tokarska, A. (2020). Values and communication in modern Ukraine: To the question of interconnection. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 1, 289–297. [In Ukrainian].
  7. Huralenko, N. (2011). The functional role of custom in the context of harmonization of modern law. Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 1(1), P. 192–202. [In Ukrainian].
  8. Kovaliv, J. I. (Ред.). (2007). Literary encyclopaedia. In 2 volumes. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Akad. [In Ukrainian].
  9. Lysyĭ, I. (2013). National-cultural identity of philosophy: Seven approaches to the topic. Publishing House "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy". [In Ukrainian].
  10. Ymka, D. (2019). In search of identity and equality. Retrieved from:  https://zbruc.eu/node/90336  [In Ukrainian]
  11. Nagornai︠a︡, L. A. (2011). Sociocultural identity: pitfalls of value distinctions. Instytut Lviv Polytechnic National University, Prof. Dr. hab., Full Professor, Theory of Law and [Сonstitutionalism Departament Institute for Law, Psychology, and Innovative Education NAN Ukraïny. [In Ukrainian].
  12. Nazarov, M. M. (1999). Mass communication in the modern world: Methodology of analysis and research practice (URSS). Retrieved from:  https://davaiknam.ru/text/nazarov-m-m-massovaya-kommunikaciya-v-sovremennom-mire-metodol  [In Ukrainian].
  13. Shyprikevich V. (1972a). Oh little willow, white face... Retrieved from:  http://kulturamovy.univ.kiev.ua/KM/pdfs/Magazine17-14.pdf  [In Ukrainian].
  14. Shyprikevich, V. (1972b). Issues of phonostylistics (Kyiv University Department). [In Ukrainian].
  15. Yeshchenko, T. (2021). The phenomenon of artistic text: Communicative, semantic and pragmatic aspects: Monograph (LNU named after D. Halytskyi). Retrieved from:  https://dlib.kiev.ua/items/show/800#?c=0&m=0&s=0&cv=0  [In Ukrainian].
  16. Zabski, E. (2008). Notka o paradoksie statku Tezeusza oraz identycznaści genetycznej. Filozofia Nauky, 16(1), P. 75–82. [In Poland]
  1. KRIPKE, S.A. (1972). Naming and Necessity. In: Semanticsof Natural Language, Editors: Davidson, D.,Harman, Gilbert(Eds.) The Rockefeller University, Princeton University. [In Ehglish]
  1. ŻABSKI, EUGENIUSZ (2008). Notka o paradoksie statku Tezeusza oraz identycznaści genetycznej. Filozofia Nauki. Rok XVI. 2008. Nr 1 (61) [In Poland]
  1. GARBACZ, PAWEL (2002). Relatywna identyczność I nieodróżnialność. Filosofia Nauki. 10/3/4, 53-64.   [In Poland]