Features conclusions submitted experts

2017;
: pp. 467-473

О. Nesimko «Features conclusions submitted experts» http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/volume-1-number-865-14...

Authors:
1
Lviv Polytechnic National University, Institute of Jurisprudence and Psychology

The term “expert” is perceived as determine whether the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the object set standards desired level. The object undergoing examination, checking for compliance with its established or preferences. Thus, the examination - a first test, research and solving involving experienced people issues that require special znan. U current conditions there is need for expertise in different areas and levels of human activity. These factors lead to a variety of examinations carried out in any area of social activity.

 

1. Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny, pryynyata 28 chervnya 1996 roku [The Constitution of Ukraine, adopted June 28, 1996] Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 1996. Vol. 30. 141 p.
2. Kryminal’nyy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 5 kvitnya 2001 r [The Criminal Code of Ukraine on April 5, 2001] Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 2001. Vol. 25. 131 p.
3. Tsyvil’nyy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 16.01.2003 r [The Civil Code of Ukraine of 16.01.2003] Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 2003. Vol. 40–44. 356 р.
4. Tsyvil’nyy protsesual’nyy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 18.03.2004 r [Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine of 18.03.2004] Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 2004. Vol. 40–41, 42. 492 p.
5. Zakon Ukrayiny “Pro sudovu ekpertyzu” vid 25.02.1994 r [The Law of Ukraine “On judicial ekpertyzu” from 25.02.1994 p.] Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. 1994. Vol. 28. 232 p.
6. Instruktsiya pro pryznachennya ta provedennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertynykh doslidzhen’ ta Naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsiy z pytan’ pidhotovky ta pryznachennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertykh doslidzhen’ vid 08.10.1998 roku [Instructions on the appointment and conduct forensic examinations and ekspertynyh Scientific research and guidance on training and appointment of judicial examination and expert research from 10.08.1998 year]. Vol.53. [Elektronnyyresurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://zakon4. rada. gov. ua/laws/show/z0705-98
7. Doroshenko O. F. Problemy vzayemodiyi sudiv ta ekspertiv pry roz·hlyadi sprav shchodo porushennya prav intelektual’noyi vlasnosti [Doroshenko OF Problems of courts and experts in cases of infringement of intellectual property rights / O. F. Doroshenko theoretical and practical aspects of the economy and intellectual property]. 2011. [Elektronnyy resurs]–Rezhym dostupu: http://eir. pstu. edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/137/2.1. pdf? sequence=1
8. Khodanovych V. O. Problemy pravovoho instytutu sudovoyi ekspertyzy v tsyvil’nomu protsesi Ukrayiny [Problems of legal forensics institute civil proceedings in Ukraine] V. O. Khodanovych. – Chasopys Akademiyi advokatury. Vol. 21. 2013. pp.1–6.