The influence of philosophical-legal ideas of the period of the New Age, the main
tendencies of the development of logic and rhetoric on the formation of the theory of legal
argument is revealed. It is emphasized the decisive influence of rationalism as a new scientific
paradigm on the formation of new approaches in argumentation. The analysis of the
correlation between logic and rhetoric in philosophical knowledge and its influence on the
process of argumentation is analyzed. Characterized by philosophical and philosophical-legal
concepts that have made the greatest impact on the formation of legal arguments of the New
Age and modern times.
1. Bekkaria Ch. O prestuplenijah i nakazanijah [About crimes and punishments]. Moskva: Stels, 1995. 302 p. 2. Istorija politicheskih i pravovyhuchenij [History of political and legal studies]. Uchebnikdljavuzov / Podredakciejdokt. jurid. nauk, professora O. Je. Lejsta. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo «Zercalo», 2006. 568 p. 3. Kistyany`k V. I. Pravova argumentaciya: suchasni pidxody` doyiyi rozuminnya v zarubizhny`x doslidzhennyax [Legal argumentation: modern approaches to its understandingin foreign studies] // Naukovizapy`sky` NaUKMA. Yury`dy`chninauky`. 2012. T. 129. pp. 20–22. 4. Kozyubra M. I. Teoriya yury`dy`chnoyi argumentaciyi ta yiyi osobly`vosti v konsty`tucijnomu sudochy`nstvi [Theory of legal argumentationan ditspeculiaritiesin constitutional proceedings] // Visny`kKonsty`tucijnogo SuduUkrayiny`. No. 6. 2016. pp. 167–180. 5. Komaxa L. G. Logichnizasady` argumentaciyi u filosofs`komuznanni [Logical bases of argumentation in philosophical knowledge]: monografiya. Ky`yiv: Centr uchbovoyi literatury`, 2015. 360 p. 6. Lejbnic G. V. Sochinenija [Writings]: v4-h t. Moskva: Mysl’, 1983. T.2. 686p. 7. Pankratov D. V. O nekotoryh modifikacijah logiki argumentacii [On some modifications of the logic ofargumentation] // Nauchno-tehnicheskajainformacija. Ser. 2. Informacionnye processy i sistemy. 1999. No. 1–2. pp. 76–82. 8. Romanova A. S. Metodologichny`j algory`tm pravovogo lyudy`norozuminnya [Methodological Algorithm of Legal Human Understanding] // Pravo i suspil`stvo. 2017. No. 4, ch. 2. pp. 38–41. 9. Ruzavin G. I. Metodologicheskie problemi argumentacii [Methodological problems of argumentation]. M., 1997. 204 p. 10. Yurkevy`ch M. O. Ty`tov V. D., Kucepal S. V. tain. Yury`dy`chna argumentaciya. Logichni doslidzhennya [Legal argumentation. Logical researches]: monografiya. 2-ge vy`d., pererobl. tadopov. Xarkiv: Pravo, 2015. 336 p.