Modern theoretical and legal approaches to understanding human rights

Кhrystyna Didukh "Modern theoretical and legal approaches to understanding human rights"
http://science.lpnu.ua/law/all-volumes-and-issues/number-331-2021/modern...

Authors:
1
Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies Lviv Ph. D

The article identifies two main approaches to clarifying the essence of the definition of rights, namely: that human rights are defined as a concept and as a system of principles that provide, guarantee the conditions of human existence, norms and traditions, and as a measure of freedom and determination. component of the legal status of the person; human rights are interpreted both as the foundations of the constitutional order and as the basis of civil society and the foundation of modern civilization. Given these approaches, it is determined that human rights are strongly linked to the freedom of the individual and are its basis, a concept that reflects the value and dignity of man and at the same time his requirements to have certain opportunities (subjective rights) to make this person's life truly worthy. Human rights also define the vertical relations that are formed between man and the state and are an instrument of limiting power. The definition of these rights in the legal act creates much more reliable guarantees for their implementation. It is concluded that human rights are a common and equal for all norm (measure) of possible behavior (freedom), which is final to meet the basic, necessary needs of existence, development and self-realization of the individual, which in specific historical conditions is reflected in mutual recognition of freedom objects of legal communication (with other persons, the state and society) and does not depend on its official declaration by the state (human rights are determined by international acts), although of course it needs state recognition and guarantee. Given the various existing features that cover all categories of rights, including environmental, socio-economic, our proposed understanding of human rights is certainly not universal, however, in our opinion, it reveals the meaning and purpose of human rights.

1.  Sabo Y. (1981). Ydeolohycheskaia borba y prava cheloveka [Ideological struggle and human rights]. Otv. red. V. N. Kudriavtsev. Per s venherskoho E. D. Kalytenko. Moskva: Yurydycheskaia lyteratura, 136 p.

2.  Selivanov V. (2005). Prava i svobody liudyny: klasychna doktryna i suchasna kontseptsiia (do porivnialnoi kharakterystyky) [Human rights and freedoms: classical doctrine and modern concept (to comparative characteristics)]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. № 4 (43). P.3–15.

3.  Obshchaia teoryia prav cheloveka [General theory of human rights]. (1996). Otvetstvennыi redaktor doktor yurydycheskykh nauk E. A. Lukasheva. Moskva: Norma. 520 p.

4.  Filosofiia prav liudyny [Philosophy of human rights]. (2012). Za redaktsii Sh. Gosepata ta G. Lomanna; Per. z nim. O. Yudina ta L. Doronichevoi. 2-he vyd. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr. 320 p.

5.  Brems E. (2003). Vorohy chy soiuznyky? [Enemies or allies?] Feminizm ta kulturnyi reliatyvizm yak dysydentski holosy v rozmovi pro prava liudyny. Prava liudyny: kontseptsii, pidkhody, realizatsiia. Per. z anhl. Pid red. B. Zizik. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «Ai Bi». P.145–173.

6.  Donnelli Dzh. (2003). Kulturnyi reliatyvizm ta universalni prava liudyny [Cultural relativism and universal human rights]. Prava liudyny: kontseptsii, pidkhody, realizatsiia. Per. z anhl. Pid red. B. Zizik. Kyiv: Vyd-vo «Ai Bi». P.129–144.

7.  Dzhefri R. (2006). Zlochyny proty liudstva: borotba za pravosuddia v usomu sviti [Crimes against humanity: the struggle for justice around the world]. Per. z anhl. H. Ye. Krasnokutskoho; Nauk. red. M. O. Baimuratov. Odesa: Bakhva. 628 p.

8.  Iurydychna entsyklopediia [Legal Encyclopedia]: V 6 t. Holova redkol Yu. S. Shemshuchenko. Kyiv: Ukr. entsykl., 1998. T.4: N-P. (2002). 720 p.

9.  Barykhyn A. B.(2010). Bolshaia yurydycheskaia эntsyklopedyia [Large legal encyclopedia]. (Seryia «Professyonalnыe spravochnyky y эntsyklopedyy»). Moskva: Knyzhnыi myr, 960 p.

10. The New Encyclopedia: Micropaedia [The New Encyclopedia: Micropaedia]. (1988). Vol. 6.. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica (data zvernennia: 1.09 2021).

11. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro osnovy natsionalnoi bezpeky y oborony Ukrainy» [Law of Ukraine "On the Fundamentals of National Security and Defense of Ukraine"]. Baza danykh «Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy» / VR Ukrainy. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/964-15#Text (data zvernennia: 1.09 2021).

12. Natsionalna stratehiia u sferi prav liudyny [National strategy in the field of human rights]: zatverdzhena Ukazom Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 25 serpnia 2015 roku № 501/2015. URL: http://www.president.gov.ua/documents/5012015-19364 (data zvernennia: 1.09 2021).

13. Poliakov A. V. (2004). Antropoloho-kommunykatyvnoe obosnovanye prav cheloveka [Anthropological and communicative substantiation of human rights] (tezysы doklada). Prava cheloveka: voprosы ystoryy y teoryy. Materyalы mezhvuzovskoi nauchno-teoretycheskoi konferentsyy 24 aprelia 2004 hoda. Pod red. D. Y. Lukovskoi. SPb.: :IuFSPbHU. P. 19–28.

14. Teoryia hosudarstva y prava [Theory of state and law]. (2011). Chast 1. Teoryia hosudarstva: Uchebnyk. Pod red. M. N. Marchenko. Moskva: «Zertsalo-M». 516 p.

15. Chechot D. M. (1968). Subъektyvnoe pravo y formы eho zashchytы  [Subjective law and forms of its protection] L.: Yzd-vo Lenynhradskoho unyversyteta. 72 p.

16. Rabinovych P. (2015). Osnovopolozhni prava liudyny: termino-poniattievyi instrumentarii doslidzhennia ta vykladannia [Fundamental human rights: term and conceptual tools for research and teaching].. Pravo Ukrainy. № 2. P. 9–23.

17. Hlukhareva L. Y. (2003). Prava cheloveka v sovremennom myre [Human rights in the modern world] (sotsyalno-fylosofskye osnovы y hosudarstvenno-pravovoe rehulyrovanye). Moskva: Yurystъ. 304 p.