The issue of regulation of criminal procedural coercion in the context of ensuring the rights of the individual is extremely relevant in criminal procedural law in terms of the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings. The need for proper regulation of criminal procedure rules in order to implement in the national criminal procedure legislation of Ukraine and individual European countries European standards of criminal proceedings is the basis for building a system of criminal procedure of the security type.
Therefore, the cornerstone for the development of criminal procedural science and the development of a unified judicial practice is the real provision in the criminal process of legal protection of a person as a subject of criminal proceedings through the implementation of procedural guarantees of rights and freedoms of this person. legal relations. At the same time, the legality and validity of the use of procedural coercion in criminal proceedings becomes important in this context. In different European countries, the implementation of procedural coercion is regulated differently.
In particular, in Ukraine, based on the provisions of the current CPC of Ukraine, the regulation of procedural coercion is mainly expressed through the implementation of measures to ensure criminal proceedings and, in particular, in their system - precautionary measures in criminal proceedings. Therefore, the main task of the criminal process of the security type in any state is to develop reliable legal mechanisms to prevent all kinds of abuse and mistakes of the subjects who conduct the criminal process and, accordingly, authorized to implement criminal procedural coercion.
1.Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. Elektronnyi resurs: Rezhym dostupu https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text
2. Criminality and Criminal Justice in Contemporary Poland: Sociopolitical Perspectives Dr Dagmara Woźniakowska-Fajst, Professor Anna Kossowska, Professor Beata Czarnecka-Dzialuk, Professor Dobrochna Wójcik, Professor Irena Rzeplińska, Professor Konrad Buczkowski, Professor Paulina Wiktorska, Professor Witold Klaus Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2015. 272 p.
3. Code of Criminal Procedure in the version published on 7 April 1987 (Federal Law Gazette [Bundesgesetzblatt] Part I p. 1074, 1319), as most recently amended by Article 3 of the Act of 23 April 2014 (Federal Law Gazette Part I p. 410)
4. The Criminal Procedure Code of the republic of Moldova – UNICEF and NORLAM Chisinau, November 2009. 268 p.
5. Huzela M. (2021). Deiaki problemy zastosuvannia okremykh zapobizhnykh zakhodiv yak zakhodiv protsesualnoho prymusu v kryminalnykh provadzhenniakh [Some problems of application of certain precautionary measures as measures of procedural coercion in criminal proceedings]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu ”Lvivska politekhnika”. Seriia "Iurydychni nauky". T. 8, № 1(29). P. 117–122.
6. Huzela M.V. (2020). Stanovlennia ta sutnist zapobizhnykh zakhodiv yak vydu zakhodiv protsesualnoho prymusu v kryminalnomu protsesualnomu zakonodavstvi ta u teorii kryminalnoho protsesu Ukrainy [Formation and essence of precautionary measures as a type of measures of procedural coercion in the criminal procedural legislation and in the theory of criminal procedure of Ukraine]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu ”Lvivska politekhnika”. Seriia "Iurydychni nauky". T. 7, № 2(26). P.223–230.
7. Huzela M.V. (2020). Zapobizhni zakhody yak camoctiinyi riznovyd zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia: pidstavy ta meta zastosuvannia [Precautionary measures as an independent type of measures to ensure criminal proceedings: grounds and purpose of application]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu ”Lvivska politekhnika”. Seriia "Iurydychni nauky". T. 7, № 3(27). P.194–198.
8. Rymarchuk H., Soroka S. (2017). Rehlamentatsiia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia v systemi protsesualnoho prava inozemnykh derzhav [Regulation of measures to ensure criminal proceedings in the system of procedural law of foreign states]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu "Lvivska politekhnika". Seriia: Yurydychni nauky. № 865. P.483–488.
9. Nykonenko M. Ya. (2014). Vydy zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia ta yikh mistse i rol u protsesi dokazuvannia [Types of measures to ensure criminal proceedings and their place and role in the evidentiary process]. Sudova apeliatsiia. № 1 (34). P. 67–69.
10. Skriabyn A. N. (2015). Osobennosty provedenyia sledstvennыkh deistvyi y mer obespechenyia uholovnoho proyzvodstva v otnoshenyy advokata po zakonodatelstvu Ukraynы [Peculiarities of conducting investigative actions and measures to ensure criminal proceedings against a lawyer under the legislation of Ukraine]. Evrazyiskaia advokatura. №1 (14)
11. Prыtkova E. V. (2013). K voprosu ob osnovanyiakh prymenenyia protsessualnыkh mer obespechenyia bezopasnosty podozrevaemoho (obvyniaemoho), zakliuchyvsheho dosudebnoe sohlashenye o sotrudnychestve [On the question of the grounds for the application of procedural measures to ensure the security of the suspect (accused) who concluded a pre-trial cooperation agreement]. Yzvestyia AltHU. № 2 (78).
12. Hroshevoi Yu., Shylo O. (2013). Merы obespechenyia uholovnoho proyzvodstva po UPK Ukraynы: poniatye, systema y poriadok prymenenyia [Measures to ensure criminal proceedings under the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine: the concept, system and procedure for application]. Uholovnoe sudoproyzvodstvo. № 1. P. 19–23