Implementation of smart irrigation using IoT and Artificial Intelligence

: pp. 575–582
Received: January 29, 2023
Accepted: May 10, 2023

Mathematical Modeling and Computing, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 575–582 (2023)

Laboratory of Information Technology and Modeling, Faculty of Sciences Ben M'Sik; Pluridisciplinary Research and Innovation Laboratory (LPRI)
Laboratory of Information Technology and Modeling, Faculty of Sciences Ben M'Sik
Pluridisciplinary Research and Innovation Laboratory (LPRI)
Computer Science Department, RTM Team, FST Mohammedia

Water management is crucial for agriculture, as it is the primary source of irrigation for crops.  Effective water management can help farmers to improve crop yields, reduce water waste, and increase resilience to drought.  This can include practices such as precision irrigation, using sensors and technology to deliver water only where and when it is needed, and conservation tillage, which helps to reduce evaporation and retain moisture in the soil.  Additionally, farmers can implement water-saving techniques such as crop selection, crop rotation, and soil conservation to reduce their water use.  Thus, studies aimed at saving the use of water in the irrigation process have increased over the years.  This research suggests using advanced technologies such as IoT and AI to manage irrigation in a way that maximizes crop yield while minimizing water consumption, in line with Agriculture 4.0 principles.  Using sensors in controlled environments, data on plant growth was quickly collected.  Thanks to the analysis and training of these data between several models among them, we find the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes (NB), the KNN has shown interesting results with 98.4 accuracy rate and 0.016 root mean squared error (RMSE).

  1. Madakam S., Uchiya T.  Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT): Principles, Processes and Protocols.  The Internet of Things in the Industrial Sector. Computer Communications and Networks. Springer, Cham. (2019).
  2. Eli-Chukwu N. C.  Applications of artificial intelligence in agriculture: A review.  Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research.  9 (4), 4377–4383 (2019).
  3. Rehman T. U., Mahmud M. S., Chang Y. K., Jin J., Shin J.  Current and future applications of statistical machine learning algorithms for agricultural machine vision systems.  Computers and electronics in agriculture.  156, 585–605 (2019).
  4. Lowry G. V., Avellan A., Gilbertson L. M.  Opportunities and challenges for nanotechnology in the agri-tech revolution.  Nature Nanotechnology.  14 (6), 517–522 (2019).
  5. Mahmood Khan Pathan S., Firoj Ali M.  Implementation of Faster R-CNN in Paddy Plant Disease Recognition System.  2019 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Computer & Telecommunication Engineering (ICECTE), Rajshahi, Bangladesh. 189–192 (2019).
  6. Gore S., Nagtilak S., Joshi A., Kulkarni S., Labade N.  Smart Irrigation System for Agriculture using IOT and ML.  International Journal of Contemporary Architecture The New ARCH.  8 (2), 1200–1206 (2021).
  7. Goap A., Sharma D., Shukla A. K., Rama Krishna C.  An IoT based smart irrigation management system using Machine learning and open source technologies.  Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 155, 41–49 (2018).
  8. Soliman M., Usami T., Imamura S., Yano K., Ballal H., Abbas A. M., Abdel Fattah T., El-Kafrawy S., El-Sayed H., El-Shafie A.  Synthesis of Geospatial Database and Interdisciplinary to Achieve NSDS for Downtown Alexandria, Egypt Vision 2030.  Proceedings of the International Cartographic Association.  4, 101 (2021).
  9. Belgiu M., Drăguţ L.  Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions.  ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.  114, 24–31 (2016).
  10. Sharif M., Khan M. A., Iqbal Z., Azam M. F., Ikram U. L. M., Javed M. Y.  Detection and classification of citrus diseases in agriculture based on optimized weighted segmentation and feature selection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.  150, 220–234 (2018).
  11. Käfer P., Souza da Rocha N., Ribeiro Diaz L., Kaiser E., Santos D., Veeck G., Robárti D., Rolim S., Oliveira G.  Artificial neural networks model based on remote sensing to retrieve evapotranspiration over the Brazilian Pampa.  Journal of Applied Remote Sensing.  14 (3), 038504 (2020).
  12. Maimaitijiang M., Ghulam A., Sidike P., Hartling S., Maimaitiyiming M., Peterson K., Kadam S., Burken J., Fritschi F. Unmanned Aerial System (UAS)-based phenotyping of soybean using multi-sensor data fusion and extreme learning machine.  ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.  134, 43–58 (2017).
  13. Kumar S., Mishra S., Khanna P., Pragya.  Precision Sugarcane Monitoring Using SVM Classifier.  Procedia Computer Science.  122, 881–887 (2017).
  14. Thanh Noi P., Kappas M.  Comparison of Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel-2 Imagery.  Sensors.  18 (1), 18 (2018).
  15. Chlingaryan A., Sukkarieh S., Whelan B.  Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture: A review.  Computers and Electronics in Agriculture.  151, 61–69 (2018).
  16. Yassin M. A., Alazba A. A., Mattar M. A.  Modelling daily evapotranspiration using artificial neural networks under hyper arid conditions.  Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences.  53 (3), 695–712 (2016).
  17. Choi Y., Kim M., O'Shaughnessy S., Jeon J., Kim Y., Song W. J.  Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Empirical Models to Determine Daily Reference Evapotranspiration.  Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers.  60 (6), 43–54 (2018).
  18. Wu M., Feng Q., Wen X., Deo R. C., Yin Z., Yang L., Sheng D.  Random forest predictive model development with uncertainty analysis capability for the estimation of evapotranspiration in an arid oasis region.  Hydrology Research.  51 (4), 648–665 (2020).
  19. Nalepa J., Kawulok M.  Selecting training sets for support vector machines: a review.  Artificial Intelligence Review.  52 (2), 857–900 (2019).
  20. Rish I.  An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier.  IJCAI 2001 workshop on empirical methods in artificial intelligenc.  3 (22), 41–46 (2001).
  21. Cunningham P., Delany S. J.  k-Nearest neighbour classifiers – A Tutorial.  ACM computing surveys.  54 (6), 1–25 (2021).