Modeling throttle bridge measuring transducers of physical-mechanical parameters of Newtonian fluids

2021;
: pp. 515–525
https://doi.org/10.23939/mmc2021.03.515
Received: June 09, 2021
Revised: August 28, 2021
Accepted: August 30, 2021

Mathematical Modeling and Computing, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 515–525 (2021)

1
Lviv Polytechnic National University
2
Lviv Polytechnic National University
3
Lviv Polytechnic National University
4
Lviv Polytechnic National University

The paper proposes a measuring transducer of the physical-mechanical parameters of a Newtonian fluid based on a throttle bridge measuring diagram with identical turbulent and laminar throttles in opposite arms.  A mathematical model is built for the throttle bridge transducer of the combined parameter, which depends on the kinematic viscosity and density of the fluid.  The problem of parametric optimization of the proposed measuring transducer is formulated and analytically solved in the paper.  The authors calculated the transform function of the measuring transducer of the combined parameter of jet fuel.

  1. Liu G., Yan B., Chen G.  Technical review on jet fuel production.  Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 25, 59–70 (2013).
  2. Pistun Ye., Matiko H., Krykh H., Matiko F.  Structural Modeling of Throttle Diagrams for Measuring Fluid Parameters.  Metrology аnd Measurement Systems. 25 (4), 659–673 (2018).
  3. Nitecki J.-P., Patrick S.  U.S. Patent 6,073,483.  Device for Measuring the Viscosity of Fluid (2000).
  4. Clarke P. G., Murphy M. P.  U.S. Patent 9,612,183 B2.  Modular Capillary Bridge Viscometer (2017).
  5. Trainoff S. P.  U.S. Patent 7,331,218 B2.  Capillary Bridge Viscometer and Method for Measuring Specific Viscosity (2008).
  6. Teplukh Z., Dilay I., Stasiuk I., Tykhan M., Kubara I.  Design of linear capillary measuring transducers for low gas flow rates.  Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 6/5 (96), 25–32 (2018).
  7. Stasiuk I.  Gas Dynamical Capillary Flowmeters of Small and Micro Flowrates of Gases.  Energy Engineering and Control Systems. 1 (2), 117–126 (2015).
  8. Pistun Ye., Matiko H., Krykh H., Matiko F.  Synthesizing the Schemes of Multifunctional Measuring Transducers of the Fluid Parameters.  Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 6/5 (90), 13–22 (2017).
  9. Tomaszewska-Wach B., Rzasa M. R., Majer M.  Measurement of two-phase gas-liquid flow using standard and slotted orifice.  Informatics, Control, Measurement in Economy and Environment Protection. 9 (4), 30–33 (2019).
  10. Drevetskiy V., Klepach M.  The Intelligent System for Automotive Fuels Quality Definition.  Informatics, Control, Measurement in Economy and Environment Protection. 3 (3), 11–13 (2013).
  11. Tepliukh Z. M.  Mathematical modeling of gas-hydro-dynamic throttle bridge measuring diagrams.  Automatics. 3, 38–42 (1985), (in Russian).
  12. Drevetskiy V. V., Kvasnikov V. P.  Optimizing the geometry of throttle dividers of gas-hydro-dynamic measuring diagrams.  Collection of scientific works of VIKNU. 16, 18–23 (2008), (in Ukrainian).
  13. Pistun Y., Matiko H., Krykh H.  Mathematical Models of Throttle Elements of Gas-hydrodynamic Measuring Transducers.  Energy Engineering and Control Systems. 5 (2), 94–107 (2019).
  14. Sutera S. P., Skalak R.  The History of Poiseuille's Law.  Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 25, 1–19 (1993).
  15. Nagornyi V.  Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems. Publishing house "Lan" (2021), (in Russian).
  16. Trofimov I. L., Boychenko S. V., Landar I. O.  Review of the current state and prospects for the use of jet fuels.  Science-intensive technologies. 4 (48), 521–533 (2020), (in Ukrainian).
  17. Steffe J. F.  Rheological methods in food process engineering.  USA, Freeman Press (1996).
  18. Livak-Dahl E., Sinn I., Burns M.  Microfluidic Chemical Analysis Systems.  Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering. 2, 325–353 (2011).
  19. ISO 5168:2005.  Measurement of fluid flow – Procedures for the evaluation of uncertainties.  Geneva, International Organization for Standardization (2005).
  20. Mrowiec A.  Uncertainty Assessment for Determining the Discharge Coefficient C for a Multi-Opening Orifice.  Applied Science. 10, 8503 (2020).
  21. Golijanek-Jedrzejczyk A., Swisulski D., Hanus R., Zych M., Petryka L.  Estimating the uncertainty of the liquid mass flow using the orifice plate.  EPJ Web of Conferences. 143, 02030 (2017).