Mathematical modeling of mixed-traffic in urban areas

2022;
: pp. 226–240
https://doi.org/10.23939/mmc2022.02.226
Received: July 07, 2021
Revised: October 28, 2021
Accepted: November 13, 2021

Mathematical Modeling and Computing, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 226–240 (2022)

1
Department of Mathematics, Khwopa College; Department of Mathematics, School of Science, Kathmandu University
2
Department of Mathematics, School of Science, Kathmandu University
3
Department of Mathematics, School of Science, Kathmandu University

Transportation is the means of mobility. Due to the growth in the population, rising traffic on road, delay in the movement of vehicles and traffic chaos could be observed in urban areas.  Traffic congestion causes many social and economic problems.  Because of the convenience and the quickness, motor-bikes gradually become the main travel mode of urban cities.  In this paper, we extend the Lighthill–Whitham–Richards (LWR) traffic flow model equation into the mixed-traffic flow of two entities: car and motor-bike in a unidirectional single-lane road segment.  The flow of cars is modeled by the advection equation and the flow of motor-bikes is modeled by the advection-diffusion equation.  The model equations for cars and motor-bikes are coupled based on total traffic density on the road section, and they are non-dimensionalized to introduce a non-dimensional number widely known as Péclet number.  Explicit finite difference schemes satisfying the CFL conditions are employed to solve the model equations numerically to compute the densities of cars and motor-bikes.  The simulation of densities over various time instants is studied and presented graphically.  Finally, the average densities of cars and motor-bikes on the road section are calculated for various values of Péclet numbers and mixed-traffic behavior are discussed.  It is observed that the mixed-traffic behavior of cars and motor-bikes depends upon the Péclet number.  The densities of motor-bikes and cars in the mixed-traffic flow approach the equilibrium state earlier in time for smaller values of Péclet number whereas densities take longer time to approach the equilibrium for the greater values of Péclet number.

  1. Greenshields B. D.  A Study of Highway Capacity.  Highway Research Board Proceeding. 448–477 (1935).
  2. Wierbos M. J., Knoop V. L., Hänseler F. S., Hoogendoorn S. P.  A macroscopic flow model for mixed bicycle–car traffic.  Transportmetrica A: Transport Science. 17 (3), 340–355 (2021).
  3. Lighthill M. J., Whitham G. B.  On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads.  Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 229, 317–345 (1955).
  4. Richards P. I.  Shock Waves on the Highway.  Operations Research. 4 (1), 42–51 (1956).
  5. Pandey G., Rao K, R., Mohan D.  Modelling vehicular interactions for heterogeneous traffic flow using cellular automata with position preference.  Journal of Modern Transportation. 25 (3), 163–177 (2017).
  6. Lenorzer A., Casas J., Dinesh R., Zubair M., Sharma N., Dixit V., Torday A., Brackstone M.  Modelling and simulation of mixed traffic.  Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 37, 1–12 (2015).
  7. Shiomi Y., Hanamori T., Eng M., Nobuhiro U., Shimamoto H.  Modeling traffic flow dominated by motorcycles based on discrete choice approach.  Proceedings of 1st LATSIS Conference (2012).
  8. Chen G., Fu G., Deng M., Li L.  A cell automation traffic flow model for mixed traffic.  Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 96, 1412–1419 (2013).
  9. Chanut S., Buisson C.  Macroscopic model and its numerical solution for two-flow mixed traffic with different speeds and lengths.  Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1852 (1), 209–219 (2003).
  10. Logghe S., Immers L. H.  Multi-class kinematic wave theory of traffic flow.  Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 42 (6), 523–541 (2008).
  11. Wong G. C. K., Wong S. C.  A multi-class traffic flow model – an extension of LWR model with heterogeneous drivers.  Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 36 (9), 827–841 (2002).
  12. Zhang P., Zhang R. X., Wong S., Dai S. Q.  Hyperbolicity and kinematic waves of a class of multi-population partial differential equations.  European Journal of Applied Mathematics. 17 (2), 171–200 (2006).
  13. Ngoduy D.  Multiclass first-order modelling of traffic networks using discontinuous flowdensity relationships.  Transportmetrica. 6 (2), 121–141 (2010).
  14. Lebacque J., Lesort J., Giorgi F.  Introducing Buses Into First-Order Macroscopic Traffic Flow Models.  Transportation Research Record. 1644 (1), 70–79 (1998).
  15. Daganzo C. F., Knoop V. L.  Traffic Flow on Pedestrianized Streets.  Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 86, 211–222 (2016).
  16. Fan S., Work D. B.  Heterogeneous Multiclass Traffic Flow Model With Creeping.  SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 72 (2), 813–835 (2015).
  17. Gashaw S., Goatin P., Härri J.  Modeling and Analysis of Mixed Flow of Cars and Powered Two Wheelers.  Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 89, 148–167 (2018).
  18. Van Wageningen-Kesselsa F., van't Hof B., Hoogendoorna S. P., van Lint H., Vuik K.  Anisotropy in generic multi-class traffic flow models.  Transportmetrica A: Transport Science.  451–472 (2013).