The relevance of the research topic of this scientific article lies in the fact that the coordination of activities of entities responsible for combating corruption serves as a fundamental factor in ensuring the effectiveness of anti-corruption policy. Proper coordination not only enables the determination of strategic objectives and delegation of functional responsibilities among anti-corruption entities but also accumulates their potential and resources to focus efforts on solving key tasks in the fight against corruption. This underscores the urgent need to establish a highly effective administrative and legal mechanism that would ensure effective coordination of anti-corruption entities. For Ukraine, an acceptable model of administrative and legal support for coordination must address modern challenges and threats, be based on democratic principles of public administration, comply with European standards, and facilitate Ukraine’s integration into the legal framework of the European Union.
The scientific article focuses on identifying and analyzing the key shortcomings of the current system of administrative and legal support for coordinating anti-corruption entities. These include the lack of a systematic regulatory framework to govern the coordination of anti-corruption activities; the underestimation of the role of civil society organizations in coordination processes; and the lack of proper alignment of powers between coordination bodies. These shortcomings complicate the implementation of state anti-corruption policy, diminishing its efficiency and effectiveness. It is crucial to recognize that the absence of a clear hierarchy and procedures for interaction between bodies authorized to coordinate anti-corruption efforts is one of the key factors hindering the development of an effective management system in this area.
The study also examines the necessity of reforming the administrative and legal mechanism for coordinating entities in the context of integrating modern technologies. The introduction of electronic platforms for automating information exchange processes among anti-corruption entities can significantly enhance transparency and efficiency in their interactions. Additionally, strengthening cooperation between government bodies and civil society deserves particular attention, as it is an indispensable condition for establishing an effective anti-corruption environment.
The analyzed shortcomings are not solely organizational and legal in nature but also largely reflect broader issues in the functioning of public administration in Ukraine. Addressing these issues requires systematic reforms aimed at comprehensively updating administrative legislation, particularly by creating a clear hierarchical model of coordinating bodies that considers international standards and recommendations. Building an effective coordination system requires not only improving regulatory frameworks but also cultivating an institutional culture based on principles of transparency, accountability, and mutual responsibility among entities. Engaging the public in monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of anti-corruption entities can become a key element in increasing trust in anti-corruption policy.
Significant emphasis should be placed on strengthening international cooperation, particularly in adopting innovative approaches to coordinating anti-corruption entities. Collaboration with international organizations and the adoption of best global practices will help ensure the establishment of a sustainable and effective governance mechanism in this area.
Administrative and legal support for coordinating entities in the fight against corruption is a complex and multifaceted process that requires not only improving the regulatory framework but also a systematic approach to developing interaction mechanisms, engaging civil society, and integrating modern technologies into public administration practices.
The relevance of combating corruption in Ukraine in 2025 remains extremely high, as corruption continues to be one of the main obstacles to economic development and European integration. The conditions of martial law and the country’s post-war recovery make the fight against corrupt schemes even more critical. Transparency in the distribution of international financial aid is a key factor in maintaining the trust of Western partners. Ukraine has committed to implementing anti-corruption reforms as required by the EU and the IMF, which is essential for further funding and progress toward EU membership. Effective anti-corruption efforts also impact national defense, as embezzlement in the military sector directly undermines state security. Increasing public trust in government institutions is possible only if corrupt officials are held accountable. The development of digitalized public services helps minimize human involvement in decision-making and reduces corruption risks. A major challenge remains judicial reform, as an independent and fair judiciary is crucial to eliminating impunity. Strengthening the work of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the High Anti-Corruption Court (HACC) will contribute to prosecuting top-level corrupt officials. The success of anti-corruption efforts in 2025 will determine not only Ukraine’s economic and political stability but also its international reputation and prospects for full integration into the European Union.
- Dem’ianchuk, V. A. (2018). Shlyakhy udoskonalennia rivnia vzaemodii mizh sub’iektamy zapobihannia ta protydii koruptsii v Ukraini [Ways to improve the level of interaction between the subjects of corruption prevention and counteraction in Ukraine]. Pravovyi chasopys Donbasu, 1. P. 97–102. [In Ukrainian].
- Khromova, K. I. (2016). Administratyvno-pravovi zasady diial’nosti orhaniv prokuratury Ukrainy shchodo protydii koruptsii: avtoreferat dys. … kand. iuryd. nauk: 12.00.07 administratyvne prawo i protses; finansove prawo; informatsiine prawo KhNUVS [Administrative and legal principles of the activities of the prosecution authorities of Ukraine regarding the fight against corruption: abstract of the diss. … Candidate of Law: 12.00.07 administrative law and process; financial law; information law]. Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs. 22 p. [In Ukrainian].
- Pautov, V. O. (2020). Protydiia koruptsii, yak strukturna skladova natsional’noi bezpeky Ukrainy: dys. [Counteraction to corruption as a structural component of Ukraine’s national security: dissertation for a candidate of public administration degree: special. 25.00.05]. Kyiv. 236 p. [In Ukrainian].
- Pro koordynatsiiu diial’nosti pravookhoronnykh orhaniv u sferi protydii zlochynnosti ta koruptsii [On the coordination of the activities of law enforcement agencies in the field of combating crime and corruption]: Nakaz Heneral’noi prokuratury Ukrainy vid 16.01.2013 No. 1. Baza danyh “Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy” / VR Ukrainy. Retrieved from: https://cutt.ly/Hj4xyYz (Accessed: 22.01.2025). [In Ukrainian].
- Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia “Pro koordynatsiiu diial’nosti pravookhoronnykh orhaniv po borot’bi iz zlochynnistiu ta koruptsii” [On the approval of the Regulation “On the coordination of law enforcement agencies in the fight against crime and corruption”]: Nakaz Heneral’noi prokuratury Ukrainy, Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy, Sluzhby bezpeky Ukrainy, Derzhavnoi podatkovoi sluzhby Ukrainy, Ministerstva oborony Ukrainy, Derzhavna prykordonna sluzhba Ukrainy, Administratsiia Derzhavnoi prykordonnoyi sluzhby Ukrainy, Derzhavna penitentsiarna sluzhba Ukrainy vid 26.04.2012 No. 43/375/166/353/284/241/290/236. Retrieved from: https://cutt.ly/Ij4vNtl (Accessed: 22.01.2025). [In Ukrainian].
- Memorandum pro spivpratsiu ta obmin informatsiieiu mizh Ministerstvom iustytsii Ukrainy, Natsional’nym antykoruptsiynym biuro Ukrainy ta Ministerstvom vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy [Memorandum of cooperation and information exchange between the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://cutt.ly/kkhRKee (Accessed: 22.01.2025). [In Ukrainian].
- Yedyni pryntsypy zovnishnoi komunikatsii mizh Natsional’nym antykoruptsiynym biuro Ukrainy ta Spetsializovanoiu antykoruptsiynoiu prokuraturoiu [Unified principles of external communication between the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office]. Retrieved from: https://cutt.ly/KkhRXjt (Accessed: 22.01.2025). [In Ukrainian].
- Yedynak, T. S., Pavlyshen, O. V. (2011). Kontrol’ yak funktsiia derzhavnoho upravlinnia: sutnist’ ta klasyfikatsiia [Control as a function of public administration: essence and classification]. Visnyk Akademii mytnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Ser.: Derzhavne upravlinnia, 1. P. 12–18. [In Ukrainian].
- Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia [Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 07.12.1984 No. 8073-X. Baza danyh “Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy” / VR Ukrainy, 51. P. 1122. [In Ukrainian].
- Bilets’kyi, A. V. (2017). Hromadskyi kontrol’ za diial’niustiu spetsializovanykh sub’iektiv zapobihannia koruptsii [Public control over the activities of specialized subjects of corruption prevention]. Pytannia borot’by zi zlochynnistiu, 33. P. 240–248. [In Ukrainian].
- Novikov, O. V. (2019). Problemy uchasti hromadskosti u zapobihannii koruptsii v Ukraini [Problems of public participation in preventing corruption in Ukraine]. Pytannia borot’by zi zlochynnistiu, 37. P. 58–72. [In Ukrainian].
- Pro zapobihannia koruptsii [On the prevention of corruption]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 14.10.2014 No .1700-VII. Baza danyh “Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy” / VR Ukrainy, 49. P. 31–86. [In Ukrainian].