In the 20th century, accelerated urbanization prompted the development of industrial monotowns, settlements closely tied to single enterprises. Characteristic of the Soviet Union, these towns were designed according to modernist planning principles and served state-driven economic objectives. Visaginas in Lithuania exemplifies such a town, constructed during the 1970s–1980s to house personnel of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant. Designed as a purpose-built settlement in a natural setting, the city was formed by compact microdistricts as its basic units, along with large green areas and a coordinated pedestrian and cycling network. Its layout prioritized accessibility, with schools, kindergartens, and public amenities placed within walking distance.
The urban fabric of Visaginas combined standardized prefabricated housing with customised architectural projects, introducing variation in materials, façade treatments, and spatial compositions. Pedestrian corridors, civic facilities, and small-scale structures in the «atomic» aesthetic reinforced the city’s distinct identity. After the staged shutdown of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant between 2004 and 2009, Visaginas encountered various challenges. Its modernist architectural heritage, once emblematic of late Soviet urbanism, lacks legal protection, leaving key structures vulnerable to degradation, unsympathetic alterations, or demolition. The removal of landmark buildings illustrates the fragility of this urban legacy.
Nonetheless, local initiatives, including interventions by institutions and international organizations, have been promoting awareness of Visaginas’ cultural and architectural value. Such actions demonstrate the potential for civic engagement and professional collaboration to support long-term preservation. Consequently, Visaginas stands as both a representative example of Soviet industrial urbanism and a site of ongoing efforts to safeguard and reinterpret its modernist legacy for future.
- Architectural Guide of Visaginas, (2023). Architectural Guide of Visaginas. [online] Available at: <https://visaginas.guide/> [Accessed 2 November 2025].
- Art and Culture Development Foundation of Uzbekistan, (2023). Tashkent Modernism XX/XXI: A research and preservation project for Uzbekistan’s architectural heritage. [online] [Date of reference 2 November 2025].
- Baločkaitė, R., (2010). Post-Soviet transitions of the planned socialist towns: Visaginas, Lithuania. Studia Transitologica: States & Societies, 2(2), pp.63–81.
- Cinis, A., Drėmaitė, M. and Kalm, M., (2008). Perfect representations of Soviet planned space: Mono-industrial towns in the Soviet Baltic Republics in the 1950s–1980s. Scandinavian Journal of History, 33(3), pp.226–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468750802079409
- Delfi, (2019). Viešajai miesto erdvei pakitus. [online] Available at: <https://www.delfi.lt/bustas/nt-rinka/viesajai-miesto-erdvei-pakitus-80046373> [Accessed 2 November 2025].
- DOCOMOMO Portugal, (2020). Former kindergarten in Visaginas under threat of demolition. [online] Available at: <https://www.docomomo.pt/heritage/former-kindergarten-in-visaginas-under-threat-of-demolition> [Date of reference 2 November 2025].
- Drėmaitė, M., (2023). Defining the attributes for modernist urban heritage: The case of “Kaunas 1919–1939: Architecture of Optimism”. Buildings, 13(1), p.196. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010196
- Ignalinos atominė elektrinė, (n.d.). Istorija. [online] Available at: <https://www.iae.lt/lt/istorija> [Accessed 2 November 2025].
- Ilchenko, M.S., (2019). Discourse of modernist heritage and new ways of thinking about socialist urban areas in Eastern Europe. Changing Societies & Personalities, 3(3), pp.243–257. https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2019.3.3.074
- Kavaliauskas, A., (2003). Visaginas 1972–2002. Vilnius: Istorijos Fragmentai.
- Klein, M. et al., (2021). Creative and cultural industry in the Baltic Sea Region. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084239
- Liubimau, S. and Cope, B. eds., (2021). Re-Tooling Knowledge Infrastructures in a Nuclear Town. Vilnius: Vilnius Academy of Arts Press.
- Mihaylov, V. and Ilchenko, M. eds., (2023). Post utopian spaces: Transforming and re-evaluating urban icons of socialist modernism. London: Routledge.
- Nedučin, D. and Krklješ, M., (2016). Post-socialism and urban transition: Transforming the socialist city. Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 14(3), pp.347–357. https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE160817023N
- Sagaryan, Z. and Azatyan, K., (2025). Analysis of the current state of the compositional ensemble of Yerevan’s central square: Challenges and proposed solutions. Budownictwo i Architektura, 24(2), pp.157–189. https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.6934
- Smolenska, S., (2024). Kharkiv in the 1920s–1930s as the capital of victorious modernism. DOCOMOMO Journal, 70, pp.8–17. https://doi.org/10.52200/docomomo.70.02
- Statyba ir Architektūra, (n.d.). Unusual architecture photography workshop in Visaginas with Norbert Tukaj. [online] Available at: <https://sa.lt/netipines-architekturos-fotografijos-dirbtuves-visagine-su-norbert-tukaj> [Accessed 2 November 2025].
- Tranavičiūtė, B., (2023). Modernist heritage versus contested legacy: The case of “Radio City”. Buildings, 13(1), p.246. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010246
- Vale, L.J., (2014). Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. London: Routledge.
- Vilniaus regioninis valstybės archyvas, (n.d.). Vilniaus regioninis valstybinis archyvas, f.1218, ap.1, b.645.
- Wikipedia contributors, (n.d.). Visaginas. [online] Wikipedia. Available at: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visaginas> [Accessed 2 November 2025].