THE CONTENT AND FOCUS OF BRAND COMMUNICATIONS IN THE UKRAINIAN ORGANIC MARKET

2022;
: 56-75
1
Federation of the Auditors, Accountants and Financiers of Agro-Industrial Complex of Ukraine

Purpose. The purpose of this article is to study the implementation of brand communications in the Ukrainian organic market as represented in social media.

Design/methodology/approach. The materials of the research are marketing (text) messages contained on the official Facebook pages of two certified Ukrainian organic egg producers. Marketing messages were collected for the period from February 31, 2018 to December 29, 2021 (or about 3 years) and studied based on the theoretical principles of brand communication in social media in the organic market and using the quantitative method of corpus linguistics (employing corpus analysis toolkit AntConc software for text analysis). Corpus linguistics helps to reveal objective, quantitative relationships between words, and their frequency in text messages on the official Facebook pages of organic egg producers, that is making it possible to uncover the main focus of these messages. 

Findings. The results of the study show that the content of brand communications is based on the multifaceted value of organic products, as indicated by the use of a set of motives in marketing messages that may encourage Ukrainian consumers to be inclined to buy organic. The focus of marketing information is primarily directed on gastronomic hedonism and is more product-centered, with the description of the benefits of egg consumption for human health. Ukrainian organic egg producers communicate the nutritional and taste characteristics of products, but not the environmental component of production, including animal care.

Practical implications. The information about the chickens and their welfare is present in marketing messages, but it is not at the core of the implementation of brand communications, and therefore consumers may perceive such products as a good choice for their health, rather than ethically sound choices from the standpoint of animal welfare and care for the environment. However, according to Ukrainian scholars, the ecological dimension of organic production and organic products is a competitive advantage in the food market and the most important motive for the consumption of organic products than their hedonistic advantages. This is important both from the point of view of differentiating organic from other eco-labelled products, which compete with organic in the food market, and to teaching consumers to distinguish organic from non-organic. Thus, our recommendation to organic egg producers is to pay more attention to informing the target audience about the production certification and labelling because it will assure consumers of the high quality and unique value of organic products.

Originality/value. This study fills the research gap in Ukraine by having examined the content and focus of brand communications in the Ukrainian organic market, their correspondence with the motives of Ukrainian consumers and the recommendations of scientists and practitioners in the field. This study identified not only the topics of brand communications of organic egg producers but also the focus of producers on conveying certain values to the consumer, which does not fully cover the organic values. 

1. Alhabash S., Mundel J., Hussain S. A. (2017). Social media advertising: Unraveling the mystery box. In Digital Advertising. Routledge, pp. 285-299. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623252-16
2. Anisimova T., Sultan P. (2014). The role of brand communications in consumer purchases of organic foods: a research framework. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 20(5), pp. 511-532. DOI: 10.1080/10454446.2012.728984. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2012.728984
3. Anthony L. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. (2019). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. URL: http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/.
4. Baker P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. A&C Black. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996
5. Berger J., Humphreys A., Ludwig S., Moe W. W., Netzer O., Schweidel D. A. (2020). Uniting the tribes: Using text for marketing insight. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), pp. 1-25. DOI: 10.1177/0022242919873106.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919873106
6. Bryła, P. (2016). Organic food consumption in Poland: Motives and barriers. Appetite, 105, pp. 737-746. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.012
7. Crawford Camiciottoli, B., Ranfagni S., Guercini S. (2014). Exploring brand associations: an innovative methodological approach. European Journal of Marketing, 48(5/6), pp. 1092-1112. DOI:10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0770. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0770
8. Create a Page. URL: https://www.facebook.com/pages/create.
9. Dobrovolska O., Espejo J. M. R. (2018). Ukrainian organic products market: state and prospects of development. Innovative Marketing, 14(2), pp. 16-25. DOI: 10.21511/im.14(2).2018.02.
https://doi.org/10.21511/im.14(2).2018.02
10. Facebook та Instagram в Україні (лютий 2022). (2022). PlusOne. URL: https://plusone.com.ua/research.
11. FiBL Statistics - European and global organic farming statistics. FiBL. URL: https://statistics.fibl.org.
12. Fuster-Márquez M., Gregori-Signes C. (2018). Persuading consumers: The use of conditional constructions in British hotel websites. Discourse & Communication, 12(6), pp. 587-607. DOI: 10.1177/1750481318805169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318805169
13. Goh K. Y., Heng C. S., Lin Z. (2013). Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content. Information systems research, 24(1), pp. 88- 107. DOI: 10.1287/isre.1120.0469. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0469
14. Haff J. (2017). Social Media Marketing Strategies in the Organic Food Industry. Senior Theses. Dominican University of California. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2017.CMS.ST.01
15. Voorveld H. A. (2019). Brand communication in social media: A research agenda. Journal of Advertising, 48(1), pp. 14-26. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2019.1588808. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2019.1588808
16. Huang J., Cai A. Online Image of Hotel Brands on Different Language Platforms. International CHRIE Conference-Refereed Track. 2009. URL: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/refereed/Sessions/Saturday/9.
17. Husic-Mehmedovic M., Arslanagic-Kalajdzic M., Kadic-Maglajlic S., Vajnberger, Z. (2017). Live, Eat, Love: life equilibrium as a driver of organic food purchase. British Food Journal. 119(7), pp. 1410-1422. DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2016-0343. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2016-0343
18. IFOAM Organics International. (n.d.). Global Organic Certification Directory. URL: https://www.ifoam. bio/our-work/how/standards-certification/organic-guarantee.
19. Kolokolchykova, I., Oleksenko, R., Rybalchenko, N., Yefimenko, L., Ortina G. (2021). Perceive of organic products by Ukrainian consumers and problems of shaping market demand. Amazonia Investiga, 10(39), pp. 169-177. DOI: 10.34069/AI/2021.39.03.16. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.39.03.16
20. Kortelainen S. (2015). Myth about altruistic organic consumption: values influence in perceiving organic meat consumer. University of Jyväskylä.
21. Koshkalda I., Bezuhla L., Nihmatova O., Ilchenko T. (2020). Brand as a marketing tool for growth in organic sales: Evidence from Ukraine. International Journal of technology management & sustainable development, 19(3), pp. 297-316. DOI: 10.1386/tmsd_00028_1. https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd_00028_1
22. Kriege-Steffen A., Boland H., Lohscheidt J., Schneider F., Stolze M. (2010). Transparent food and consumer trust. Proceedings in Food System Dynamics, pp. 452-462. DOI: 10.18461/pfsd.2010.1032.
23. Laroche M., Bergeron J., Barbaro-Forleo G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of consumer marketing, 18(6), pp. 503-520. DOI: 10.1108/ EUM0000000006155. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006155
24. Llorens M., Puelles M., Manzano R. (2011). Consumer behavior and brand preferences in organic grocery products. Store brands vs. manufacturer brands. Innovative Marketing, 7, pp. 109-115.
25. Lu Q. S., Miller R. (2019). How social media communications combine with customer loyalty management to boost green retail sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 46, pp. 87-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar. 2018.12.005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.12.005
26. McGuire M., Kampf C. (2015). Using social media sentiment analysis to understand audiences: A new skill for technical communicators?. In 2015 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC). IEEE, pp. 1-7. DOI: 10.1109/IPCC.2015.7235801. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2015.7235801
27. Melovic B., Cirovic D., Dudic B., Vulic T. B., Gregus M. (2020). The analysis of marketing factors influencing consumers' preferences and acceptance of organic food products - Recommendations for the optimization of the offer in a developing market. Foods, 9(3), pp. 1-25. DOI: 10.3390/foods9030259. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9030259
28. Michelsen J. (2001). Organic farming in a regulatory perspective. The Danish case. Sociologia ruralis, 41(1), pp. 62-84. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00170
29. Page R. et al. (2014). Researching language and social media: A student guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771786
30. Pechrová M., Lohr V., Havlíček Z. (2015). Social media for organic products promotion. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 7(665-2016-45052), pp. 41-50. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207055.
https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2015.070105
31. Ranfagni S., Camiciottoli B. C., Faraoni M. (2016). How to measure alignment in perceptions of brand personality within online communities: interdisciplinary insights. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 35, pp. 70-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.intmar.2015.12.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2015.12.004
32. Ranfagni S., Faraoni M., Becagli C. (2018). Evaluating brands in online communities: it's not just a matter of engagement. 2018 Sinergie-SIMA Conference Proceedings: Transformative business strategies and new patterns of value creation. 14-15 June 2018. Ca' Foscari University Venice (Italy). URL: https://www.researchgate. net/profile/Claudio-Becagli/publication/332058356_Evaluating_brands_in_online_communities_it's_not_just_a_ matter_of_engagement/links/5c9cef0945851506d7306498/Evaluating-brands-in-online-communities-its-not-just-amatter-of-engagement.pdf.
33. Sheth J. N., Newman B. I., Gross B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of business research, 22(2), pp. 159-170. DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
34. Sinclair J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press.
35. Stadnyk V., Pchelianska G., Holovchuk Y., Dybchuk L. (2020). The concept of marketing of balanced development and features of its implementation in the food market. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 6(1868-2020-1687), pp. 80-95. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305554. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.03.05
36. Stanton J. V., Guion D. T. (2015). Perceptions of "organic" food: A view through brand theory. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 27(2), pp. 120-141. DOI: 10.1080/08974438.2014.897667. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2014.897667
37. Stefanowitsch A. (2020) Corpus linguistics: A guide to the methodology. Language Science Press.
38. Tuten T. L., Solomon M. R. (2017). Social media marketing. Sage.
39. Willer H., Trávníček J., Meier C., Schlatter B. (2022). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2022. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, and IFOAM - Organics International, Bonn.
40. Yadav R. (2016). Altruistic or egoistic: Which value promotes organic food consumption among young consumers? A study in the context of a developing nation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer services, 33, pp. 92- 97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.008
41. Zehir C., Şahin A., Kitapçı H., Özşahin M. (2011). The effects of brand communication and service quality in building brand loyalty through brand trust; the empirical research on global brands. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, pp. 1218-1231. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.142
42. Zufferey S. (2020). Introduction to corpus linguistics. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119779728
43. Zúñiga K. (2021). Facebook Scraper. Github.com. URL: https://github.com/kevinzg/facebook-scraper.
44. Burnett T., Home R., Gasyuk O. (2018). Sotsial'no-ekonomichne doslidzhennya rozvytku orhanichnoho rynku ta sektoru v Ukrayini [Socio-economic study of the development of the organic market and sector in Ukraine]. Doslidnyy instytut orhanichnoho sil's'koho hospodarstva [Research Institute of Organic Agriculture] (FiBL).
45. Buha N. Yu., Yanenkova I. H. (2015). Perspektyvy rozvytku orhanichnoho vyrobnytstva v Ukrayini [Prospects for the development of organic production in Ukraine]. Aktual'ni problemy ekonomiky, 2, pp. 117-125.
46. Yizhte orhanichne v Ukrayini [Eat organic in Ukraine]. URL: https://eatorganic.in.ua.
47. Koval'chuk S. V., Zaburmekha Ye. M. (2017). Marketynhovi tsyfrovi tekhnolohiyi u doslidzhenni spozhyvachiv orhanichnoyi produktsiyi [Digital marketing technologies in the study of consumers of organic products]. Marketynh i tsyfrovi tekhnolohiyi, 1, pp. 34-51. https://doi.org/10.15276/mdt.1.1.2017.3
48. Larina Ya. (2020). Motyvy spozhyvannya orhanichnykh produktiv ta yikh vplyv na marketynhovi rishennya [Motives of consumption of organic products and their impact on marketing decisions], Marketynh v Ukrayini, 5 (122), pp. 27-35.
49. Mylovanov Ye. V., Konyashyn A. V. (2019). Osoblyvosti rozvytku rynku orhanichnykh krup v Ukrayini [Features of the development of the organic cereals market in Ukraine]. Naukovi pratsi NUKHT, 25 (1), pp. 73-83. https://doi.org/10.24263/2225-2924-2019-25-1-9
50. Moseychuk V. Steminh Portera dlya ukrayins'koyi movy [Porter stemming algorithm for Ukrainian languages]. URL: https://www.marazm.org.ua/document/stemer_ua.
51. Nihmatova O. (2019). Rozvytok rynku orhanichnoyi sil's'kohospodars'koyi produktsiyi [The development of organic market]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.03. Kharkiv. nats. ahrar. un-t im. V. V. Dokuchayeva. Kharkiv.
52. Prosuvannya orhanichnoyi produktsiyi v Ukrayini. Kontseptual'ni rekomendatsiyi [Promotion of organic products in Ukraine. Conceptual recommendations]. (2013). FiBL Ukraine.
53. Rashchenko A. V. (2017). Do pytannya doslidzhennya peredumov formuvannya potreb naselennya v orhanichniy produktsiyi [To the question of research of preconditions of formation of needs of the population in organic products]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats' Bukovyns'koho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, 13, pp. 151-158.
54. Savchuk V. A. (2018). Marketynhove upravlinnya orhanichnym sektorom ahrarnoyi ekonomiky [Marketing management of the organic sector of the agricultural economy]: dys. ... kand. ekon. nauk : 08.00.03. Zhytomyr.
55. Semenda O. V., Cemenda D. K. (2019). Otsinka vnutrishn'oho rynku orhanichnoyi produktsiyi Ukrayiny ta povedinka spozhyvachiv na n'omu [Assessment of the domestic market of organic products of Ukraine and consumer behavior in it]. Molodyy vchenyy, 11 (75), pp. 609-613. DOI: 10.32839/2304-5809/2019-11-75-129. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2019-11-75-129
56. Seredniy klas v Ukrayini: uyavlennya i realiyi [The middle class in Ukraine: ideas and realities]. (2016). Anatoliy Rachok ta in. Kyyiv: Zapovit, Tsentr Razumkova.
57. Stepanenko N. I. (2013). Innovatsiynist' tsinnosti yak obʺyektyvna modal'nist' brendynhu orhanichnoyi produktsiyi [Innovative value as an objective modality of organic product branding]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats' Tavriys'koho derzhavnoho ahrotekhnolohichnoho universytetu (ekonomichni nauky), 1 (2), pp. 317-322.
58. Ul'ko Ye. (2019). Otsinka ekonomichnoyi efektyvnosti innovatsiy v orhanichnomu zemlerobstvi [Evaluation of economic efficiency of innovations in organic farming]. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific EJournal, 5 (3), pp. 118-140.
59. Shyyan D. V., Herasymenko YU. S., Veliyeva V. O., Ostapenko R. M. (2021). Prohnozuvannya popytu na orhanichnu produktsiyu u domohospodarstv iz riznym rivnem dokhodu [Forecasting the demand for organic products in households with different income levels. Investments: practice and experience]. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, 8, pp. 16-23. DOI: 10.32702/2306_6814.2021.8.16.
https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2021.8.16