Purpose of the article is the empirical research of the development of sectorial models of national economies at globalization and to provide some recommendations for transformation of sectorial model of Ukraine at the post-war period. The hypothesis is that Ukraine has a chose to form a new sectorial model of national economy with powerful Secondary (S2) and Quinary (S5) sectors that will push country to become global competitively in the terms of the post-industrial society development at the post-war period.
Design/methodology/approach. The methods of scientific research were applied to research the economic models and the structural changes of countries: theoretical generalization (to systematize scientific research of sectorial model and to formulate the conclusions), empirical method and methods of statistical analysis (to determine the structure of sectorial model of national economies of the world; to compare the level of the national economies’ development in the world and Ukraine and the their national economies’ structure via specific sectors; to simulate the sectorіal model of the national economy of Ukraine).
Findings. The development of Ukraine towards post-industrial society can be achieved by forming a modern sectorial model at postwar period. The model involves economic complexity, such as reducing the proportion of Primary (S1) and Tertiary (S3) sectors, and increasing proportion of the Secondary (S2) and Quinary (S5) sectors, which are concentrated on high-tech economic activities of material and non-material production. Development of Ukraine at the level of the countries with innovative economies involves the formation and development of sectorial model, which would be able to occupy strategic places in the global economy.
Originality/value. The research highlights the elements of the methodological system of choosing and forming the sectorial model for national economy’s development at the conditions of post-war period, based on macro-forecasting of the country's development was carried out in accordance with strategic economic tasks.
Practical implications. The obtained results impact to develop the recommendations for the formation and implementation of modern sectorial model of Ukrainian economy at the conditions of post-war period.
1. Rodrik D. (2014). The Past, Present and Future of Economic Growth. Challenge, vol. 57 (3), pp. 5-39 (in English). https://doi.org/10.2753/0577-5132570301
2. Gabriel L. F., Oreiro J. L. C., Jayme Jr F. G. (2016). A North-South Model of Economic Growth, Technological Gap, Structural Change and Real Exchange Rate. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 38, pp. 83-94 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2016.03.003
3. Bell D. (1976). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. Basic Books, 616 p. (in English). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131727609336501
4. Xiaosu Ye, Lie Ma, Kunhui Ye, Jiantao Chen, Qiu Xie (2017). Analysis of Regional Inequality from Sectoral Structure, Spatial Policy and Economic Development: A Case Study of Chongqing, China. Sustainability, vol. 9(4), 633. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040633. (in English). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040633
5. Syrquin M. (2008). Structural change and development. International Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 1, 48 p. (in English). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848442818.00010
6. Cimoli M., Katz J. (2003). Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: A Latin American perspective. Industrial and corporate change, vol. 12(2), pp. 387-411. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.387 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.387
7. Fagerberg J. (2000). Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: A comparative study. Structural change and economic dynamics, vol. 11(4), pp. 393-411. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00025-4 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(00)00025-4
8. Dancygier R. M., Donnelly M. J. (2013). Sectoral Economies, Economic Contexts, and Attitudes toward Immigration. The Journal of Politics, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 17-35. DOI:10.1017/S0022381612000849 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000849
9. UNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2013, Sustaining Employment Growth: The Role of Manufacturing and Structural Change. Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/ (in English). 10. Lee K., Lee J. (2020). National innovation system, economic complexity, and economic growth: country panel analysis using the US patent data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 30. pp. 897-928 (in English). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00612-3
11. Pyroh O.V. (2014). Structural changes in the model of national economy of Ukraine under an influence of informatization of society. Effective economy, vol. 7. Retrieved from: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op= 1&z=3170. (in Ukrainian)
12. Pyroh O.V., Shpak N.O. (2020). Transformation of the Sectoral Model of Development in the Western Region of Ukraine in Conditions of Instability. Economy and State, vol. 6, pp. 6-12 (in Ukrainian).
https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2020.6.6
13. Pyroh O., Prokopenko M., Chernobay L., Kovalenko R., Papizh Yu., Syta Ye. (2021). Management of business processes and export-import activity of industrial enterprises in the digital economy. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 39, is. 52021. DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i5.5204 (in English). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.5204
14. State Statistic Service of Ukraine data. Retrieved from: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/ (in English).
15. World bank data. Retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx (in English).
16. Doroshkevych K., Shpak N., Dzvonyk R., Naichuk-Khrushch M., Dvulit Z., Shpak Yu. (2021). Evaluation of Tactical Approaches to the Implementation of the Strategy of Innovative IT Projects. International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, vol. 2, 407 p. (in English).
17. Oleksiv I., Lema H., Kharchuk V., Lisovych T., Dluhopolskyi O., Dluhopolska T. (2020). Identification of Stakeholders Importance for the Company's Social Responsibility using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies, ACIT 2020 - Proceedings, pp. 573-576 (in English).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT49673.2020.9208897
18. Hartog M., Lopez-Cordova J.E., Neffke F. (2020). Assessing Ukraine's Role in European Value Chains: A Gravity Equation-cum-Economic Complexity Analysis Approach. Retrieved from: https://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/ publications/assessing-ukraines-role-european-value-chains-gravity-equation-cum-economic. (in English).
19. Metroverse. Retrieved from: https://metroverse.cid.harvard.edu/city/3351/overview?aggregation =industries (in English).
20. Shpak N., Kulyniak I., Gvozd M., Vveinhardt J., Horbal N. (2021). Formulation of Development Strategies for Regional Agricultural Resource Potential: The Ukrainian Case. Resources, vol. 10, 57 p. (in English). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10060057