: 21-36
Lviv Polytechnic National University
Lviv Polytechnic National University

Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine creates a number of systemic problems of an economic, social and environmental nature, which require understanding and research. War complicates the movement towards sustainable development and at the same time requires a socially responsible position of states, businesses, and international organizations. The future reconstruction of Ukraine will also require complex and responsible decisions by the Ukrainian authorities, as well as the consolidation of the efforts of the international community and big business. Under these conditions, businesses will have the opportunity to demonstrate their willingness to work towards sustainability and confirm their commitment to the principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR).

Purpose. The purpose of this article is to outline the impact of the war on the Sustainable Development Goals and to consider the position of social responsibility’s subjects regarding the response to military aggression against Ukraine. It is important to investigate the manifestations of social responsibility in various economic subjects, their willingness to make efforts to support victims of Russian aggression.

Design/methodology/approach. Conducting the research, general scientific theoretical research methods have been used, namely abstract-logical, selective observation, analysis, synthesis, generalization of data and case method. This gave reason to assert that the social responsibility of business, which is embodied in various social and environmental measures and programs, is aimed at achieving certain Sustainable Development Goals and overcoming the consequences of military actions in the state.

Conclusions. The article proves the destructive impact of war on the achievement of all 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable development is inextricably linked with social responsibility, which is a condition for achieving sustainability. It is impossible to achieve the SDGs without the involvement of business. The article groups socially responsible approaches in terms of economic subjects and summarizes the manifestations of their socially responsible actions during the military aggression against Ukraine. The conducted analysis of the socially responsible behavior of economic entities gave grounds for determining the main principles that underlie the adoption of socially responsible decisions: value orientation; solidarity and sense of complicity; readiness to voluntarily bear financial losses and costs; unconditionality.

Originality/value. The scientific novelty consists in the study of the social responsibility of economic entities in modern realities – during Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine. This made it possible to identify the direct influence of business structures on achieving the goals of sustainable development during the war. The article offers an understanding of the CSR activities of Ukrainian and foreign companies in order to support the victims and restore Ukraine. 

1. Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine (MEPR) (2022). Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine. Retrieved from: 

2. United Nations Ukraine (2021). Monitoring report on the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals 2020. Retrieved from:

3. Khaled, R., Ali, H., & Mohamed, E. K. A. (2021). The sustainable development goals and corporate sustainability performance: Mapping, extent and determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127599. 

4. Latapí Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4, 1. 

5. Douglass С. North (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 

6. Buriak Ye., Redko K., Chornovol A., Orlenko O. (2022). Sotsialno-ekonomichni aspekty staloho rozvytku Ukrainy v umovakh viiny (ievrointehratsiini aspekty) [Socio-economic aspects of sustainable development of Ukraine in the conditions of war (European integration aspects)]. Naukovi zapysky Lvivskoho universytetu biznesu ta prava. Seriia ekonomichna. Seriia yurydychna [Scientific notes of the Lviv University of Business and Law. The series is economical. Legal series]. Vol. 34, 135-143. 

7. Volynets U. (2013). Modeli sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti [Models of social responsibility]. Visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika APK [Bulletin of the Lviv National Agrarian University. Series: Economy of agriculture]. Vol. 20(1), 117-122. Retrieved from _20%281%29__21 

8. Hrishnova O. A. (2011). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist u konteksti podolannia systemnoi kryzy v Ukraini [Social responsibility in the context of overcoming the systemic crisis in Ukraine]. Instytut demohrafii ta sotsialnykh doslidzhen [Institute of Demography and Social Research], 39-46. Retrieved from 

9. Kolot A. M., Hrishnova O. A. (2012). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist: teoriia i praktyka rozvytku [Social responsibility: theory and practice of development]. Kyiv: KNEU. 

10. Krykavskyi Ye. V., Mashchak N. M. (2018). Perspektyvy implementatsii sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti biznesu u diialnist transportnoi haluzi [Prospects for the implementation of social responsibility of business in the activities of the transport industry]. ScienceRise, No. 11, 18-24. Retrieved from texc_2018_11_5 

11. Kuzmin O., Pyroh O., Chernobai L., Stanasiuk N., Pasinovych I. (2021). Osnovy korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti: stratehii ta dilovi praktyky: navchalnyi posibnyk [Fundamentals of corporate social responsibility: strategies and business practices: a study guide]. Kyiv: Condor. 

12. Kuzmin O., Stanasiuk N., Uholkova O. (2021). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: poniattia, typolohiia ta chynnyky formuvannia. [Social responsibility of business: concept, typology and factors of formation]. Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia ta problemy rozvytku [Management and entrepreneurship in Ukraine: stages of formation and problems of development]. Vol. 2 (6). 

13. Oliinyk O. (2016). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist [Social responsibility]. Rivne: NUVHP. 

14. Rudenko O. V., Kondratiuk O. M., Horieva A. S. (2020). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: sutnist, oblikovyi aspekt ta nefinansova zvitnist. [Social responsibility of business: essence, accounting aspect and nonfinancial reporting]. Efektyvna ekonomika [Efficient economy]. Vol. 11. DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2020.11.102 

15. Meadows D., Randers J., Behrens W. (1972) The limits to growth, Universe books. 

16. Pasinovych, I., & Myskiv, G. (2022). Ukrainian context of sustainable development and the role of business in its achievement. Regional Science Policy & Practice. 

17. SDG Cоmpass (2015). The guide for business action on the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Global Compact. 30 с. 

18. European Commission (2022). Corporate social responsibility & Responsible business conduct. Retrieved from

19. ISO 26000:2010 (2011). Guidance on social responsibility, and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Retrieved from isoorg/files/store/en/PUB100418.pdf 

20. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2006). Konventsiia pro zakhyst tsyvilnoho naselennia pid chas viiny. Zheneva. 1949 [Convention on the Protection of the Civilian Population in Time of War. Geneva. 1949]. Retrieved from laws/show/995_154#Text 

21. UNCTAD (2022). Tapering in a Time of Conflict. Retrieved from 

22. The Еconomic Тimes (2022). The crisis in Ukraine may lead to civil unrest in other countries. Retrieved from international/business/ukraine-crisis-could-lead-to-civil-unrest-inother-countries-warns-imf-chief-kristalina-georgieva/articleshow/90475987.cms 

23. Eurosif (2022). Eurosif statement on the Russian Federation's unlawful invasion of Ukraine. Retrieved from

24. UNCTAD (2022). Ukraine war risks further cuts to development finance. Retrieved from

25. World Bank says Ukraine has tenfold increase in poverty due to war (2022). Retrieved from

26. Еuronews (2022). Ukraine war food price spikes may push 40 million into extreme poverty-development group. Retrieved from 

27. Unicef (2022). More than half of Ukraine's children displaced after one month of war. Retrieved from

28. United Nations (2022). Secretary-General's remarks to press on the war in Ukraine. Retrieved from 

29. KSE (2022). Zvit KSE Institute stanom na lystopad 2022 roku. [Institute Report as of November 2022]. Retrieved from ukrayini-skladaye-mayzhe-136-mlrd/ (дата звернення: 28.12.2022). 

30. The Guardian (2022). Ukraine economy could shrink by up to 35 % in 2022, says IMF. Retrieved from

31. Finclub (2022). The IMF predicts a slowdown in the world economy due to the war in Ukraine [The IMF predicts a slowdown in the world economy due to the war in Ukraine]. Retrieved from ua/news/mvf-pronozuie-spovilnennia-svitovoi-ekonomiky-cherez-viinu-v-ukraini.html 

32. Eurosif (2022). Eurosif statement on the Russian Federation's unlawful invasion of Ukraine. Retrieved from

33. KSE (2022). Ponad tysiacha mizhnarodnykh kompanii vidmovylysia pity z rosiiskoho rynku [More than a thousand international companies refused to leave the Russian market]. Retrieved from economics/other/bilshe-tisyachi-mizhnarodnih-kompaniy-vidmovilisya-yti-z-rosiyskogo-rinku-kse-12008790.html 

34. Operational data portal (2022). Ukraine Refugee situation. 

35. France 24 (2022). France unveils plan to mitigate impact of sanctions on Russia. Retrieved from /en/europe/20220316-france-unveils-plan-to-mitigate-impact-of-sanctions-on-russia 

36. Who is More Powerful - Countries or Companies? (2021). Retrieved from 

37. Christine H. Fox & Emelia S. Probasco (2022). Big Tech Goes to War. Retrieved from 

38. CSR development (2022). Kataloh dii kompanii [Catalog of companies' actions]. Retrieved from