SHV (Series Humanitarian Vision) publishes only original and peer-reviewed articles based on positive responses from the anonymous reviewers. SHV Editor Board denies any kind of plagiarism. Editorial Board recognizes the advice of the Committee on Publication Ethics (http://publicationethics.org), Elsevier Publishing Ethics (https://www.elsevier.com/editors/perk), and Scopus (https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/policies-and-ethics).
On the basis of that advice, the SHV Editor Board formulated the policy of publishing ethics and the publication malpractice statement.
Fair play
Only the submitted articles' scientific quality is considered, regardless of the author's race, religious orientation, political convictions, gender, or nationality.
Confidentiality
Editors and members of the Editor Board will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. The names, e-mail addresses, postal addresses, and other information about the authors will be used only for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be available for any other purposes or persons.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Authors must disclose any substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results of their research. All sources of support for the author/researcher should be disclosed in the submitted manuscript. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other members of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication.
Digital Archiving
The journal content of all issues is archived by the Vernadsky National Library: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe.Z21ID=&I21DBN=JRN&P21DBN=JRN&S21STN=1&S21REF=10&S21FMT=fullwebr&C21COM=S&S21CNR=20&S21P01=0&S21P02=0&S21P03=I=&S21COLORTERMS=0&S21STR=%D0%96101312
Non-acceptance of plagiarism and copyright infraction
The journal rejects any kind of plagiarism and infringement of copyright. All submitted articles and materials are checked for plagiarism and possible copyright infringement. Submitted plagiarized articles will be rejected immediately. Also, articles that have already been published or are translations from other languages, which are written in violation of copyright, are not allowed for review and are rejected.
Post-Publication Policy: Corrections & Retractions
In cases of serious errors that affect the published material (but do not fully invalidate its results) or significantly impair the reader’s understanding of the published material, the editor-in-chief will publish a correction note that is linked to the published material. The published material in the journal (hard copy) will be left unchanged.
Concerning retractions, the journal follows COPE's Retraction GuCOPE'ses
Payment for the publication of articles. All journals' content is available without charge to users and their institutions.
Open access policy
The journal's content is accessible online.
Copyright policy
The authors retain copyright and offer the journal the right of first publication. Further distribution of articles must maintain attribution to the authors and the published titles of the articles, journal citation, and DOI.
Ethical Rules for Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board and Their Responsibilities
1. Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the acceptance of the submitted articles regarding their theoretical level, conceptual development, novelty, copyright, and plagiarism.
2. Editor-in-Chief and any member of the Editorial Board don't spread any information about the author of the submitted article to anyone other than.
3. Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board recognize the freedom of research approaches, ideas, conceptions, and methodological plurality, which are presented by the authors of submitted articles without any race, religious, sexual, ethnic origin, or gender discrimination.
4. Editor-in-Chief and any member of the Editorial Board should not use the denied papers for their own research purposes.
Ethical Rules for Reviewers and Their Responsibilities
1. The main task of a peer reviewer is the evaluation of submitted articles. He o he makes the decision to publish or not publish the submitted articles. Peer review via Editor-in-Chief may give the author advice on how to improve the submitted articles.
2. Peer reviewer communicates directly with the Editor-in-Chief or the Executive Secretaries.
3. Peer reviewers must be specialists at a high level in the domain that is presented in the submitted articles.
4. Each submitted article is considered confidential material and should be sent only to the chosen reviewers by the Editor-in-Chief or Executive Secretaries after consultations with the Editor-in-Chief.
5. Peer reviewer must be objective, inform the Editor or the Executive Secretaries about any similarities of the submitted articles with the articles that he or she knows.
6. Acceptance and rejection of submitted articles must be grounded on the peer reviewer's arguments, which should be clear and avoid any personal criticism.
Ethical Rules for Authors and Their Responsibilities
1. The author is responsible for the accuracy of quotations and submits only an original article that has not been published in any other journals and has not been translated from other languages.
2. It would be better if the author of the submitted article is one without any co-authors. In the case of co-authors, the SHV Editor and the Editor Board accepted no more than one co-author of the submitted article. If there is a co-author, he or she must indicate the percentage of his or her contribution to the research.
3. Authors must disclose any substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results of their research. All sources of support for the author/researcher should be disclosed in the submitted manuscript.
4. The author and co-author fill the Authorship Statement to indicate their contribution to preparing the article. The authorship Statement can be loaded at the bottom of this page.
5. The author(s) indicate the type of the article (overview or original scientific and methodological article) by a separate line above the title of the article.
6. The author is responsible for obtaining permission for using copyrighted materials.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 authorshipstatement.docx | 15.23 KB |