This study develops a mathematical model of information and analytical support for decision-making in territorial community development based on smart specialization. The model focuses on transforming heterogeneous data and expert assessments into a transparent system for prioritizing managerial actions, enabling the alignment of strategic development directions with the actual capabilities of communities and their institutional capacity to support initiative portfolios. As a methodological framework, the DEMATEL approach is employed to formalize cause–effect interactions among key factors of information and analytical support, including data governance and quality, digital infrastructure, analytical capacity, stakeholder co-creation, innovation ecosystem alignment, and monitoring and project portfolio control. Based on the matrix of direct influences, the total relation matrix is derived, and indicators of factor prominence and causality are calculated, allowing the determination of factor weights for subsequent integral assessment. To demonstrate practical application, the model is tested on selected territorial communities in Ukraine. Factor score profiles are constructed on a 1–5 scale, and an integral index of readiness of information and analytical support for smart specialization implementation is calculated. The results show that the greatest contribution to readiness is provided by analytical capacity and portfolio control, highlighting the importance of management practices related to data quality, analytical procedures, scenario planning, and systematic monitoring of initiatives. The practical value of the model is in its applicability as a decision-support tool for strategic units of territorial communities, as it provides a formalized procedure for data collection, assessment of factor interactions, prioritization, and performance monitoring. This reduces the risk of fragmented decision-making and enhances the effectiveness of smart specialization management.
- McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Transforming European regional policy: A results-driven agenda and smart specialization. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 29 (2), 405–431 (2013).
- McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Smart specialisation in European regions: issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management. 17 (4), 409–427 (2014).
- Georghiou L., Uyarra E., Saliba Scerri R., Castillo N., Cassingena Harper J. Adapting smart specialisation to a micro-economy – the case of Malta. European Journal of Innovation Management. 17 (4), 428–447 (2014).
- Komninos N., Musyck B., Reid A. I. Smart specialisation strategies in south Europe during crisis. European Journal of Innovation Management. 17 (4), 448–471 (2014).
- Kryshtanovych M., Topalova E., Tokhtarova I., Pirozhenko N., Pronina O. Definition the determinants of influence on the engineering sector and the system of its legal regulation. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering. 12 (6), 699–706 (2022).
- Foray D. From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management. 17 (4), 492–507 (2014).
- Romano A., Passiante G., Del Vecchio P., Secundo G. The innovation ecosystem as booster for the innovative entrepreneurship in the smart specialisation strategy. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development. 5 (3), 271–288 (2014).
- Lerro A., Jacobone V. Smart growth, smart specialisations strategies and impact of the technological districts: the moderating effect of business, geographical and institutional factors. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development. 5 (3), 221–237 (2014).
- MinFin Statistics. https://index.minfin.com.ua/.
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.
- Carayannis E. G., Grigoroudis E. Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance. 10 (1), 31–42 (2016).
- Peng Q., Zeng D., Yu Q. Health Evaluation of Innovation Ecosystems in Smart Cities Based on the DEMATEL-TOPSIS Method Using Wuhan as an Example. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 34 (1), 275–286 (2025).
- Tsai W.-H., Leu J.-D., Liu J.-Y., Lin S.-J., Shaw M. J. A MCDM approach for sourcing strategy mix decision in IT projects. Expert Systems with Applications. 37 (5), 3870–3886 (2010).
- Hung S.-J. Activity-based divergent supply chain planning for competitive advantage in the risky global environment: A DEMATEL-ANP fuzzy goal programming approach. Expert Systems with Applications. 38 (8), 9053–9062 (2011).
- Sakhanienko S., Sylkin O., Lypovska S., Purtskhvanidze O. Information Support of Public Administration in the Conditions of COVID-19. 2022 12th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). 290–293 (2022).
- Kryshtanovych M., Kiyanka I., Ostapiak V., Kornat L., Kuchyk O. Modeling effective interaction between society and public administration for sustainable development policy. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 18 (8), 2555–2561 (2023).